Sentences with phrase «very real argument»

Not exact matches

The essence of Chamorro - Premuzic's argument is that, a few very technical situations aside (and if you're involved in those, insufficient IQ probably isn't a major concern of yours), more real - world problems get solved with people skills than raw intelligence.

He makes the now familiar point that if negative real rates are sometimes desirable on counter cyclical grounds there is a strong argument for an inflation target high enough that the ZLB does not bind or binds only very infrequently.

If the Fed believed that a 2 percent inflation target was appropriate at the beginning of 2012 when it believed the neutral real rate was above 2 percent, I can not see any argument for not adjusting the target or altering the framework when the neutral real rate is very plausibly close to zero.

Looking at history, a very good argument could be made that that is the real social purpose of religion... to divide people, because a divided people are easy to control and manipulate.

My argument has presented an analysis of the extensive continuum which clearly makes it true to say that the extensive continuum, as just that set of actual relations among actual occasions which makes the very conception of the continuum as real potentiality intelligible, is indeed actually increased in extent by the concrescence of new occasions.

The strongest argument in favor of abortion is the very real dilemma which some pregnant mothers must face.

We have opened up the question sufficiently to show that there is a very real possibility that the whereabouts of the burial place of Jesus was not known when his resurrection first began to be proclaimed, and that unless this can be established as an historical fact, that argument for the «bodily resurrection» which we have been considering remains invalid.

The problem with such an argument is that while it offers a very helpful insight into the question of why we suffer and endure hardship, it says nothing about real evil.

But if our argument in this book is correct, the real situation is very different.

as much as I hate arsene, that was very childish and classless, their are more classy ways to hurt arsene, I can't believe fans are fist fighting, PEOPLE WE ARE BROTHERS AND SISTERS, let's attack the real enemy, whilst we lash out and pummel each other, those rich fat snobs (arsene included) laugh there way to the bank, let's show them who owns the club, abandon that stadium and they'll be holding emergency meetings with arsenal care group on how to fix the problem, we'll have them eating out of our hands, verbal arguments are fine, I never badmouth arsene or arsenal in front of a chelsea supporters but when I'm with a gooner I vent my frustration and that's perfectly fine, that's why this website exists.........

Your only real argument seems to be «he's english, so he's over-rated» while neglecting the fact that he's had two very productive seasons for a young player.

St. Mary's has no real argument here - BYU was not a very good team but at the same time was also arguably the 2nd best team St. Mary's beat all year long.

The arguments that nut bans limit the food allergic children from learning to advocate for themselves or that they need to live in the real world which will not accommodate them are also very tired ones indeed.

GOP Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis makes a very persuasive argument that Speaker Silver's «real war on women» is the failure to have the Assembly approve the 9 parts of the Women's Equality agenda... the parts that have been approved by the Senate GOP - IDC.

************** Funny, it sounds rather liek the arguments the Right uses to implement the laws designed to prevent voter fraud: Laws designed to correct a non-existant problem, except that racial discrimination is very real --- well if it is «very real» you and the leftist democrats should have no problem with offering concrete evidence of it.

After a very weird, aggressive argument about why Tinder is rubbish, and why we should all be meeting partners out in the real world (wouldn't that be great!)

The sort of problem Sontag has with Jameson is, of course, the very argument Bordwell has with anyone from Slavoj Žižek to Jacques Lacan, evident in a comment he makes on his blog (but not in the book) that echoes directly Sontag's: «Most of FRT [Zizek's The Fright of Real Tears] offers standard film criticism, providing impressionistic readings of various [Krzysztof] Kieslowski films in regard to recurring themes, visual motifs, dramatic structures, borrowed philosophical concepts, and the like.»

Setting aside the argument that it's never too late to humanize a dangerous man (if, in fact, that's the point the series is trying to make), the caricature of Donald Trump presented in the series is so oafishly relatable he does little to resemble our very real and very dangerous president (aside from a decent impression from voice actor Jeff Bergman).

In other words, her argument rests on the real concern (and very real concern in terms of the current research) that «ceiling effects» are / were preventing her students from growing upwards, enough, when compared to other «similar» students who are also to demonstrate «a full year's worth of growth.»

I think Hansen was very clear about whom he considered to be «deniers» and what he considered were the very real dangers of their arguments.

It's something of an abstract concept, but with real world implications, and the universality of such physical models, based on things like radiative balance, atmospheric composition and density, distance from the local Sun, etc., is a very strong argument in favor of general acceptance of the results of climate models and observations on Earth.

Ray's answer makes it obvious (for me) that reality is very complex and far from being explainable by simple, hand - made arguments for the general audience; that's why I think that trying to explain «simply» the very complex phenomena involved in radiation transfer is just lost time - and in my opinion the REAL issues associated with social impacts of GW are not primarily associated with the detailed physics of the phenomenon.

For rebuttals to McIntyre, read Real Climate, «Tamino's» Open Mind (a misnoma, if ever there were one), and eli rabett (the cartoonish psuedonom of a commentator not brave enough to put his real name to frequently very childish argumenReal Climate, «Tamino's» Open Mind (a misnoma, if ever there were one), and eli rabett (the cartoonish psuedonom of a commentator not brave enough to put his real name to frequently very childish argumenreal name to frequently very childish arguments).

His opposition stemmed partly from the valid argument that they impose real hardship on Iranians, but also from the very dubious claim that they make war more likely, and from the legally ridiculous assertion that western use of financial tools to block oil sales «is a financial blockade, and blockades are acts of war.»

I am aware of people making the argument that the big push by the nuclear industry for enormous government subsidies to find a massive expansion of nuclear power on the basis that nuclear power is «THE ANSWER» to global warming is a fraud that dishonestly and cynically takes advantage of growing concern about the very real problem of global warming, and I make that argument myself (because even a quite large expansion of nuclear electricity generation would have little effect on overall GHG emissions, at great cost, taking too long to achieve even that little effect, while misdirecting resources that could more effectively be applied elsewhere).

Huffington's views on comments — especially the part about using real identities being part of the «grown - up internet» — are very much in line with other arguments that have been made in the past about the dangers of anonymity, including former Facebook marketing director Randi Zuckerberg's comments in 2011 that anonymity on the internet «has to go away» because of online bullying and other bad behavior.

After 4 years of talking about real estate, seeing me purchase & house hack my first duplex AND a VERY heated 2 and a half hour argument about the risks and rewards of real estate investing with my father... My parents called and said I've convinced them to invest in multi-family.

Chris's article is a very telling expose» regarding the left - wing socialistic attitude of our so - called «mixed economy» bureaucratically dominated governments (via deputy ministers and top - tier there - forever lifetime mandarins who are the real operators of the levers of power from behind the scenes through their influential arguments that overpower the elected know - nothing M.P.'s / M.L.A.'s).