There are
very real decisions that depend on having accurate, understandable information about the influence of global warming on these kinds of extreme events.
Law and policy makers soon will face
very real decisions on how to make the system both equitable and efficient while ensuring affordability.
Not exact matches
«There's something
very uncomfortable about distorting the
decision to tax the house you live in versus the one you don't,» Todd Sinai, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business's
real - estate department, told Business Insider.
thanks, and yes, a pittance of a pension and regular checkups keep us on budget and head off any problems — best
decision i ever made (financial or otherwise) was serving our country doing search - and - rescue, oil and chemical spill remediation, etc. (you can guess the branch of service)-- along the way, frugal living, along with dollar - cost averaging, asset allocation, and diversification allowed us to retire early — Vanguard has been
very good over the years, despite the Dot Bomb, 2002, and the recession (where we actually came out better with a modest but bargain retirement home purchase)... it's not easy building additional «legs» on a retirement platform, but now that we're here, cash,
real estate, investments and insurance products, along with a small pension all help to avoid any
real dependence on social security (we won't even need it at full retirement age)-- however, like nearly everybody, we're headed for Medicare in several years, albeit with a nice supplemental and pharmacy benefits — but our main concern is staying fit, active, and healthy!
3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a
very interesting one: I liked that the author presented
real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular
decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!
It is an insult to Jesus Christ and to the
very real persecution of his earliest followers for Christians in America to suggest that the health care
decision calls for a violent, revolutionary - war - style response to the policies of the Obama administration.
It is a
very real question whether the later
decision to use the forms of Greek logical discourse did not of itself radically affect the nature of the message, the type of audience to which it would appeal, and eventually the constituency of the Church.
If you and I both claim God talks to us, but we profess
very different versions of what God told us who makes the
decision which of us... if either... is actually talking to the
Real God?
The
real situation in which the Christian of today has to make his moral
decisions is in any case such that in
very many and
very important instances, the
decision can no longer be the simple and obvious application of the principles concerning essences, even if he respects these as absolutely and universally valid.
I lean liberal, but I am
very willing to listen to what you have to say if I see that you make your
decisions and policy in the
real world based upon tested observations in the
real world.
In a
very real sense the birth of God, on our planet at least, awaits the outcome of our own human
decision for entropy or emergence.
I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a
real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had
very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee
decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12
It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in
Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal,
very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in
Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those
decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer
«Marc is
very happy at Barcelona, but if there was
real interest from clubs where he could get more space then we'll listen and make our own
decisions.»
(1) this squad has way too many moving parts and
very few of our players are good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the chemistry is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his
decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6
real starters on this current squad and that's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which is discouraging because Cazorla is injured and might never play again, Sanchez is wanting out and the club is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil is relatively disinterested out there, Kos is getting up there and Sead is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should be the standard... imagine this team moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes
Starvation is a
very real possibility when it comes to breastfeeding issues, so there is no shame in making the best
decisions for you and your baby.
As someone who was talked OUT OF an epidural even though I
very much wanted one, I can say it's much worse when someone refused to listen to your
very real request for an intervention then when they speak to you about an intervention like you are an adult making a
decision based on facts.
The consumer is being harmed in a
very real way by USDA's
decision not to label this stuff on packaging.
But there was enough evidence on 5 May to suggest that if the government is foolish enough to push ahead with HS2 this December, the
decision will have
very real electoral consequences for the main parties in Buckinghamshire and right along the route, beginning in 2013 with the county council elections.
He sees the momentum of this «town on the move» as resting largely in the hands of the incoming Town Board members, who make most of the crucial
decisions: «It's
very easy to point to what you think is wrong; the
real challenge is to point to what is right and how you can make it better,» says Zatz.
Even though ethics may not seem that important for something like a job search, an ethics
decision, if you botch it, can have
very real consequences.
Keeping chocolate away from children 100 % throughout their entire childhood, while a
very good idea that is awesome if you can pull it off, is still a
decision that has the
very real potential of backfiring bigtime.
 I would have to tell her that Daddy and I are already married and have been since before you were born we just never actually had a
real wedding so this was part of the reason my husband and I made the
decision to renew our vows, so that now more than 10 years later our kids would be able to be a part of our
very special day.
Sohn and crew were inspired by the beautiful yet dangerous environment, which is why they came to the
decision of give the characters a
very cartoony, stylized look in contrast to the almost photo -
real environment.
They worked on concepts like compromise and mutual benefit when it came to creative
decisions — ultimately there was a
very real - world feel to what was happening in this fictional digital world.
Urban schools reinforce the student perception that teachers bear final responsibility for what they learn.By allowing passive witnesses, the schools support these student perceptions that all relationships are (indeed rewarding) students for being essentially authoritarian rather than mutual.As youth see the world, they are compelled to go to school while teachers are paid to be there.Therefore, it is the job of the teacher to make them learn.Every school policy and instructional
decision which is made without involving students — and this is almost all of them — spreads the virus that principals and teachers rather than students must be the constituency held accountable for learning.In a
very real sense students are being logical.In an authoritarian, top - down system with no voice for those at the bottom, why should those «being done to» be held accountable?
Many Educators 4 Excellence teachers were facing this
very real threat and thought about how these
decisions were going to affect their students.
«While it's unclear, the full extent of the impact the proposed changes will have on local
decision making and resources available for public services, the threat it poses to students, parents and communities is
very real.
If lawmakers hope to leave the Commonwealth better than they found it, they must gain a better understanding of the
very real impact their
decisions about school funding have on children.
(I've notice that authors are
very good at assuming their own beliefs are those of the market in general;
real - world testing is, of course, a more logical way to make pricing
decisions.)
Real estate and small businesses are
very illiquid; months may pass between the owner's
decision to sell and his or her receipt of cash for the property or business.
And if you are a landlord, protecting your valuable
real estate asset with landlord's insurance is a
very prudent risk management
decision.
Most people aren't aware of the
very real pitfalls that can come with cosigning a loan, and cosigners often end up completely blindsided by the ramifications of their
decision.
But
very few people actually get off their ass and actually do some
real research on what they should be investing in, so they either 1) don't invest altogether, or 2) make some stupid investment
decisions.
I mean, you want everyone in the game to be powerful, be able to make
real decisions, and that's
very hard to do with local co-op, especially four way co-op, unless you're doing a brawler.
What is certain though is that they pose an immediate and
very real threat to your survival, making players»
decisions whether to run or stand his ground crucial in each varying situation.
5 In a
very real sense, Rauschenberg's
decision to limit his palette to black and white in the early 1950s was a return to basics, and he was careful to distinguish his approach from the thinking that guided the overdetermined psychological and emotional connections to blackness often associated with abstract expressionist canvases of the 1940s.
PARENTEAU: It's testing these theories which are
very similar against a body of state law, in different states as you just mentioned, and so it's probing, it's trying to find a breakthrough case where you can find a state supreme court willing to make a really bold
decision finding not only a right to a healthy environment, or a safe climate, stable climate, but also finding a duty on the part of the government to take
real tangible action to address that.
packed with common problems awaiting for solutions - global warming, urban air pollution, contaminants in drinking water / contains samples of distributions of variables, it is actually a
very large Bayesian belief network, which can be used for assessment - level analyses and conditioning and optimising different
decision / and discussions about the actual topics related to
real - world
decision - making, there is also a meta level in Opasnet.
These bad
decisions have
very real effects on people's lives, so this situation is as far from theoretical as one can get.
As part of our contribution, CSW commented that the document might carry greater relevance for
decision - makers who want to advance a needed adaptation agenda to an unconvinced or climate - skeptic audience (a
very real possibility) by including more explicit language on the ways in which climate change issues can be framed to appeal to diverse groups — for example, emphasizing the potential damages to people and property to one community, the negative impacts to industry in another.
With all of the
very real concerns about the future of energy usage on the planet, Genesis Energy, an energy supplier and retailer in New Zealand has come up with a terrific way of helping kids develop a strong basis on which to develop future knowledge about the issues surrounding global energy usage without overwhelming them with every sophisticated detail... Essentially, they've come up with a game not too unlike SimCity, where kids get to develop their own city in a game that features 150 «turns»; each of which is a chance to make a wide array of
decisions about the usage of energy, natural resources, and ultimately the future of the population within it.
This was my favorite «game», as it utilizes technology to forge a
very real step forward — and a distinct improvement — in the way we carry out community
decision - making processes.
But the point was: It is wrong to suggest that
real - world development - related policy
decisions are routinely based on
very precise predictions of future problems, and that we can not act on climate change because the models do not meet these alleged standards.
What interests me is that the U.S. court
decision is unlikely to have any
real impact on the state of the law (though it may cause lawyers headaches in having to screen the large mass of cases), given the fact that the vast majority of cases are never cited more than a
very few times — DNA lines, as it were, that die out as «unfit.»
In a unanimous
decision, the Supreme Court (Phillips, Rodger, Hale, Collins & Kerr LLJ) reversed the
decision in the Court of Appeal, finding that the English connections in this case were «substantial, if not overwhelming», and that there was a «
very large disparity between what the husband received and what the wife received such as to create
real hardship and a serious injustice».
However the case of Tapere and a limited number of other tribunal
decisions (see, for example, Royden and ors v Barnetts Solicitors Liverpool ET Case no. 2103451 / 07) demonstrate the
very real potential for large numbers of claims being brought by employees not prepared to move after a transfer.
As reported in this morning's National Law Journal, the idea was that of departing Justice John Paul Stevens, and Leahy supports it because it would eliminate the
very real threat of 4 - 4
decisions, which, under the rules, result in an effective affirmation of the lower court's
decision.
«The
real import of this
decision — not to my client, who is obviously
very disappointed — but to the profession is, we have got to get people access to justice, and we've got to do a better job, and so we really need to make this more accessible.»
We assist our clients in a
very real sense, by taking the lead and not hesitating where necessary to steer towards tactical and strategic
decisions when much is at stake.