Sentences with phrase «very real evidence»

It also ignores the very real evidence that spending time doing Trap - Neuter - Return and fostering truly social cats will help a much greater number of cats.
You said, «you refuse to acknowledge the very real evidence of God's existence.
No, but there must be a reason you refuse to acknowledge the very real evidence of God's existence.

Not exact matches

«Given the nature of the charges against the defendant and the apparent weight of the evidence against him, defendant faces the very real possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison,» Ellis said of the former campaign manager.
Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.
no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)
Even if Jesus were a real person, there is no evidence of his divinity, no evidence of a god, no evidence of your god, and very little to support most bible stories.
There is evidence that the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA)'s very real stylistic freedom is accompanied by a homogenous substance of beliefs and values.
There is considerable evidence that the UUA's very real stylistic freedom is presently accompanied by a homogenous substance of beliefs and values.
It's actually a big deal that NRO is portraying her (with real evidence, after all) as the very model of pro-life feminism.
So, I say, gods might exist but the probability is very low, and decreasing given the amount of time believers have been flailing about trying to make the irrational rational and how science provides better answers with real evidence, peer - reviewed under the scientific method.
No evidence, all very silly, all created from the EGO, nothing real
this is a dishonest attempt by evolutionists to hijack very real and substantial evidence and occurrence just as they attempt to do with the natural order.
If there was any real evidence for anything divine, you can bet those very same scientists would be testing, refining, and honing that evidence for their own benefit as well as for the benefit of others.
Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
But my biggest problem with all these stories is with the idea of a god who generally tries to hide anything that could be seen as real evidence (because you need faith) and then slips up and shows it every now and then in very culturally and belief specific ways.
Take the money away from the public schools where children will be taught real science and that a «theory» is very close to a proven fact because it is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.
In fact, the professor says that the only benefit that found support with real evidence is a very small advantage in level of intelligence in babies that are breastfed.
But there was enough evidence on 5 May to suggest that if the government is foolish enough to push ahead with HS2 this December, the decision will have very real electoral consequences for the main parties in Buckinghamshire and right along the route, beginning in 2013 with the county council elections.
«These two attack dogs [Koku Anyidoho and Kofi Adams] engaging in the monotonous acts of character assassination to avoid the real issue, deliberately repeated similar unfounded accusations against me that I had creditably refuted with supporting facts and evidence, which the very media carrying the recycled accusations had published in previous years.
************** Funny, it sounds rather liek the arguments the Right uses to implement the laws designed to prevent voter fraud: Laws designed to correct a non-existant problem, except that racial discrimination is very real --- well if it is «very real» you and the leftist democrats should have no problem with offering concrete evidence of it.
New Home Secretary Alan Johnson may have raised the idea in a bid to appeal to voters ahead of disastrous local and European election results for Labour, but there is very little evidence of an appetite in government for changing the voting system from first past the post to real proportional representation.
Beyond that, we now have the evidence that reinforces earlier findings on the effects of ambient pollution at large and can say that these effects are very likely real, not just loosely correlated or tied up with other economic issues like household migration dynamics.»
The concept of OEE was generally well received, as evidenced by this quote from the report: «This kind of elevator would be very useful in getting a building quickly evacuated because it takes time to go down those stairs and the more people you can get out quickly, especially from the higher levels, the less likely there is to be a real disaster.»
Karp and colleagues» results show only a very modest drop in borers as forest coverage grows, he points out, and Johnson would like to see stronger evidence that the effect is real.
Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.
Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well).
It's all very well to have a theory and simulations suggesting it should be true, but real observational evidence is great,» said Curtis Struck, a professor of astrophysics at Iowa State University in Ames and co-author on the paper.
«It's easy to put everybody else's needs first — lack of time, lack of sleep are very real issues — but there's some pretty compelling evidence that the demands of caregiving can be pretty toxic on a person's mental and physical health,» she says.
The real reason behind his change of mind was the enormous amount of evidence which suggested that carbs are the real reason behind obesity and poor cardiovascular health, which he had the chance to confirm by observing his very own patients.
All in all, there is much recent evidence pointing to some very real benefits for making dietary changes in order to improve mental health outcomes.
While Spielberg's visual and storytelling instincts are always in evidence — the film is impeccably shot and never dull — his greatest contribution was his belatedly discovered but very real sense of rage about the subject matter.
Amid inevitable and deserved praise for Streep, one must pay very real tribute to Grant, who seems to have found a humanity not evidenced from him in years.
But the evidence suggests it is a very real choice, and one with grave implications for American education.
However, while there is little evidence of rebellion, retreatism is a very real danger as it is very common in the compliant classroom.
We don't know just how price sensitive foreign investors might be to property in Vancouver, but we do have subjective evidence that some foreign buyers have driven up residential real estate prices very rapidly, especially in multiple bidding situations, with little concern for inherent value.
«Thanks to further largess from the arts community, Pratt Institute's Flameproof student exhibition will be coming to Bushwick Open Studios... «I think the idea of participation in the art community is much more in evidence in this context, it feels very real, participatory,» [Pratt professor Greg Drasler] said.»
Simultaneously converting and re-converting a digital and a physical, a real and an ephemeral, a high art and a consumer product, the presentation questions the very stability of the lines of divisions, yet sketching the ground plans of something that can be reactivated and used as evidence.
«I think the idea of participation in the art community is much more in evidence in this context, it feels very real, participatory,» he said.
Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.
Digging a little deeper, however, we discovered evidence of what we suspected anyway, that there is a very real, very contemporary link between the abuse of natural resources and the abuse of our fellow humans.
If we have real - world evidence that temperatures were warmer than today during most of the past 10,000 years (and also during several interglacial warm periods during the past few million years), and if we also have real - world evidence that human civilization thrived during these warmer temperatures and the warmer temperatures did not trigger so - called «tipping points» sending the planet into a climate catastrophe, then we have very little reason to believe that our presently and moderately warming temperatures are now poised to send the planet into a climate catastrophe.
Rowan suggested that wind turbines cause health problems, in spite of the lack of any scientifically acceptable evidence for this, but neglected to mention the very real health problems caused by the toxic substances released by the burning of coal.
Richard Betts says: «The evidence also suggests that even if «seepage» is real, at the very least this seepage has had no influence in watering - down UK public opinion and political action compared to other countries — and that possibly the opposite has occurred because the public are more convinced by seeing scientists being objective.»
And thus, via a rational economic path, conjoined with inexorably strengthening scientific evidence that AGW is real, serious, and accelerating, we will all of us here on Climate Etc eventually learn to «just get along», very much in the spirit of America's Framers and Founders, eh Latimer Alder?
I'm saying, sure, but if this very credible physical forcing is real — and the huge weight of evidence says it is — then this trend is just going to continue over longer time spans.
the dirty little secret is that there is still no way to test the IPCC climate models for their feedback behavior,... The very fact that the 20 + climate models the IPCC tracks still span just as wide a range of feedbacks as climate models did 20 years ago is evidence by itself that the climate community still can't demonstrate what the real cloud feedbacks in the climate system are....
Whatever is happening in the great outdoors regarding actual climate, inside the minds of men overwhelming evidence indicates that Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming is a self - sustaining narrative that is living off our mental capacity, either in symbiosis or as an outright cultural parasite; a narrative that is very distanced from physical real - world events.
I make precisely as much money from granting agencies for shooting down Jelbring's absurd paper as I do from the Big Oil companies for stating that the preponderance of evidence suggests that the very real GHG - GHE is not a catastrophic threat under any reasonable scenario for the economic and technological development of the world for the rest of the 21st century.
Whatever is happening in the great outdoors regarding actual climate epidemics, inside the minds of men overwhelming evidence indicates that Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming the Germ Theory of Disease is a self - sustaining narrative that is living off our mental capacity, either in symbiosis or as an outright cultural parasite; a narrative that is very distanced from physical real - world events.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z