Sentences with phrase «very reasons you suggest»

In fact, for the very reasons you suggest, Chromosome 2's fusion argues against the literal view of a genetically perfect Adam / Eve who only suffered mutation after the fall, that is, an overnight fixation of this fusion throughout the entire human population.

Not exact matches

That decentralization is hard to differentiate from Bitcoin's, a cryptocurrency Gensler suggested is almost certainly not a security for the very reason we're discussing: no discernable third party (no common enterprise) upon whom we rely for any expectation of profits.

Kellie suggested this is not a problem (in context of showering), but it is a problem for the very reason the military segregates M / F sleeping arrangements.

The only reason I suggest it is because you can witness the demonstration of the power of God in the preached word and it is a very good place to be if you are seeking your own experience, but you don't have to be in church to be saved.

It's intellectually dishonest of you to suggest there is only one reason people resort to name - calling, but based on your comments honesty is not very important to you.

Arkoun suggested that the Pope, at Regensburg, had been «right» to affirm that today «an intimate relationship between reason and faith does not exist in Islamic elaboration and expressions», but that it was unfortunate that he had not mentioned the very different situation that prevailed «before the death of the philosopher Averroes in 1198».

And that for the very simple reason that it intends to be what its title suggests, the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The very popular al - Jazeera website contained a piece suggesting that the Pope's speech was hypocritical because the Catholic Church had fought modern reason since the advent of science.

CH: Non-infinite survival would provide what you suggest here, but I see no very strong reason to accept it.

It'll be very slack; for this reason, we suggest kneading in a bread machine, or with a mixer, rather than by hand.

Although the reasons for this variation are not clear, the marked differences in salt content of very similar products suggest that technical reasons are not a primary explanation.

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We suggest that parents will find it useful for three very important reasons:

BH: As your example suggests, there is often a way to cobble together a coalition of people who all agree on the importance of a public thing, but for very different sorts of reasons.

«In our view, it defies both reason and credibility to suggest Sen. Klein would have, in full view of both his longtime girlfriend, numerous staff members, and in the middle of a very visible and public street, assaulted the Former Staffer, as her allegation suggests,» the report read.

And if for some reason the interviewer suggests you might not be very versatile, for goodness» sake don't say: «I'm not a one - trick pony, I'm not a 10 - trick pony.

The real reason behind his change of mind was the enormous amount of evidence which suggested that carbs are the real reason behind obesity and poor cardiovascular health, which he had the chance to confirm by observing his very own patients.

New research suggests there are very good reasons to keep foods that are made with wheat...

For the same reason never be afraid of using suggested here treatments but always believe they are very effective and safe.

Suggested tweaks: Even though the honey is a very small amount, if battling dental decay and / or avoiding sugar carbos for any reason, a more tooth - and blood - sugar - friendly sweetener is xylitol granules.

you changed the thinking of all the people about maxi dresses, and all the dresses are very beautiful and the tips you suggest will proves very beneficial for a lot of girls who wants to wear these type of dresses, but they can't for some reasons.

In fact the very nature of his character seems to imply a reason for his suicide attempt and subsequent determination to «fixâ $ his family â $ «he mentions at one point that he was living alone, a statement that may seem fairly inconsequential but has larger implications of loneliness, and thus suggests a possible cause for his suicide attempt.

A fact like that gave reason to suspect it might not perform very well and the passage of time suggested that the original film's magic would be tough to recreate.

The reason adequacy studies tend to prefer the professional judgment method is clear enough, and it does not seem like a stretch to suggest that the CEP might prefer that method for the very same reason.

«These findings are very encouraging as it suggests that if we successfully address reasoning and comprehension skills, we can overcome any disadvantage due to SES.»

«I would argue in the past that was not the case and it could very well be because of a certain discomfort about talking about that group for the reasons you have suggested, around it being seen as an extreme view.

There are very simple reasons as to why these systems are in place at all, suggests noted researcher and educator Alfie Kohn in an interview on his book Punished by Rewards with Education Week reporter Roy Brandt:

This is the very reason that self - publishing success story and vocal champion for indie authors Hugh Howey has suggested the formation of an actual union for indie authors.

I try very hard not to suggest a change without a reason — but you said it best.

The renters insurance experts at Effective Coverage generally suggest increasing your liability limits as high as possible for that very reason — it's not unlikely that someone could sue you for several hundred thousand dollars.

I'm going to suggest four possible answers: 3 % (if you are very conservative and have saved more than you're likely to need), 4 % if you prefer a conservative approach that lets you spend a bit more, 5 % if you're comfortable with a moderate approach that will give you still more to spend, or 6 % if (for any number of potential reasons) you are comfortable being that aggressive.

When I told her about the 3 conflicting denial reasons she suggested that I obtain a letter from a SSA Supervisor, on Official SSA Letterhead that states the above reasons I have no review date, but to have it worded in very SMALL words so anyone could understand it.

Fernandez suggests that clients choose this option unless there's a compelling reason to reduce it, such as a spouse who «has a whole bunch of money or a pension of her own and she doesn't need the survivor option, thank you very much.»

For a variety of reasons ranging from the fact that there is zero scientific evidence suggesting that one breed is more prone to attacking or biting than another to the subjectivity of BSL's very nature, which relies on an undefined breed identification system that harms many more dogs than it might originally intend.

One reason for being confident about there being much more uncertaintly than the 97 % concensus suggests is that there is nothing like a concensus, let alone proof, of what caused (and causes) the extreme natural variations in climate throughout geological time.This variation is well documented and almost certainly has a variety of underlying causes which are likely to be very different from C02 or other MM emissions even if higher greenhouse gases levels have often been present.

When it was suggested to Adam that perhaps his own motivated reasoning and ideology prevent him from questioning climate science or even that very dodgy paper, (he thought he was being smeared / attacked personally) http://talkingclimate.org/are-climate-sceptics-more-likely-to-be-conspiracy-theorists/

So I would suggest that we decline this one (at the very end of the time period), with one of the valid reasons that you, Jonathan [Colam - French] and I disucssed, and let him go through appeal.

Is it fair to suggest that maybe, just maybe, the reason that the President and the EPA Administrator are so very reluctant to invoke the full regulatory authority of the EPA is because they both fear the consequences of sparking a widespread popular backlash against the lifestyle sacrifices which most certainly must be made in reducing America's GHG emissions 80 % by 2050?

Reason suggests very few members of the investor class, the newspaper's purported target, have much time for a grant - fattened sprouter of the academic left's conventional wisdom.

This article suggests the opposite reason — that, first, the airwaves are dominated by the very message you would probably welcome — that «climate change» is a frightening prospect and we must do «something» about it.

It seems very odd to me that Pagano and colleagues suggested no reasons for the unexpectedly poor showing of polar bear hunting success during their study except a bit of hand - waving about higher - than - we - thought metabolic rates in the bears.

Recognizing that the carbon cycle is very complex, so there are reasons that the simple comparison could be off (going either way of course), the chart suggests that only 20 % of the total anthropogenic CO2 emissions occurred in the same period where 50 % of the total change in atmospheric CO2 concentration were observed.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

The early scientific reviews suggest a couple of reasons: firstly, that modelling the climate as an AR (1) process with a single timescale is an over-simplification; secondly, that a similar analysis in a GCM with a known sensitivity would likely give incorrect results, and finally, that his estimate of the error bars on his calculation are very optimistic.

As the title suggests, the ACM considered the plan incompatible with competition law in a very preliminary and barely reasoned finding.

It may seem melodramatic to suggest that David Bitton's word should be law when it comes to maximizing productivity via automation, but it certainly stands to reason that, at the very least, the co-founder of the highest - rated practice management software company in the world knows what he's talking about.

That is a position, we suggest, some way from the origins of the principle of providing adequate reasons, and one that may have very significant ramifications for many public decision - makers.

I would suggest that AVVO's purported «contract» may be unenforceable for this very reason.