Sentences with phrase «very robust conclusion»

Those who understand climate and geo / eco-sciences know we are altering the climate, since this is a very robust conclusion.

Not exact matches

We can not make robust conclusions because the subgroup of patients with negative EGFR was very small, but the hypothesis generated here is that those tumours do not respond well to necitumumab.»

Because these moderate extremes are by definition more common, and because the authors looked at global statistics rather than those for highly localized, rare events, the conclusions are extremely robust, said Peter Stott, leader of the Climate Monitoring and Attribution Team at the Met Office Hadley Centre, in the U.K. «I think this paper is very convincing,» said Stott, who was not involved in the research.

Among the book's more «robust» conclusions, to use the economists» term, is that the high Swedish expenditure on adult education (which is very well developed in Sweden, as a resource for unemployed workers and as a way of upgrading or changing one's credentials) is not warranted by its returns: But how could it be, when, we learn, «individuals received student pay [all students are paid in Sweden — part of the commitment to equality] at the level of unemployment benefits, which in Sweden replace up to 80 percent of forgone earnings.»

Our very different conclusion is that the 2ºC line can indeed be held, but that doing so demands courageous initiatives and a robust policy architecture, both of which go beyond politics as usual.

Overall, the submissions reinforce the impressions of sceptics viz. * the IPCC process is politically driven * IPCC is still indulging in (uncritical) selection bias * IPCC is still giving unjustified credence to the output of computer models * IPCC's handling of statistics is very poor * IPCC's conclusions are not robust At least the submissions attest to the fraudulence of the IPCC's pretense of presenting itself as an objective and impartial assessor of the literature.

«We have to be very careful in using a study like this in drawing those robust «natural gas can't help» [conclusions],» he said.

(For example, if your entire conclusion changes if you eliminate the year 1998, then the conclusion is probably not very robust!)

My conclusion is that in spite of many opposite statements the very robust relationship between CO2 emissions and the rate of economic growth can't be disputed, at least in a relevant and meaningful time horizon.

The main point of that paper was that very high climate sensitivities could be excluded by the LGM temperature reconstructions and I still think that this is a robust and important conclusion.

95 % confidence interval has been traditionally used because it is wide enough to be attained in many instances, but robust enough that unfounded conclusions aren't very likely be made.»

Conclusion: Among others, the «lessons» that can be gleaned from the VTech and VTech USA cases include: (i) IoT / connected toys and devices remain very vulnerable in the face of haphazard / sloppy security practices; (ii) inadequate security safeguards will no longer be tolerated by regulators, particularly when children's information or other sensitive information is involved; (iii) robust and adequate security safeguards involve multi-level tiers of protection per the above; (iv) vendors should never misrepresent the state of their security practices in their privacy policies; and (iv) in a connected world, regulators are willing to work together and share data and resources to combat «deceptive and unfair practices that cross national borders» (in the words of the FTC).

Conclusion — on one hand we are seeing a very robust and growing economy with a stock market that continues to grow.