Sentences with phrase «very same god»

Hitler DID believe what he was doing was in line with GOD's will... the very same god as christians... He is a good example of what happens when unfounded beliefs meet power.

I am a Servant of the Creator of Heaven and Earth, I am a Servant of the very same God that created me.

Ah yes, the very same God who never told Job why he does what he does used a verse or two from the Bible to tell them why someone's dear wife died, why a hurricane struck New York City, and why another lost their job and now is living under a bridge.

The jews just worship the god these folks are the prophets of, althou some claim jesus is the son of that very same god and therefore better — if a son of a god can die so easily, whats the point i ask you!

REGARDLESS OF AUTHORSHIP (last week's debate), it is factually demonstrable that the FINAL FORM of the NT considers the God of the OT to be the VERY SAME God it is writing about (against Dr Baden's claim).

Second answer: Amen to all that with the addition that it is that very same God who has drawn near to us and shared our lot in Jesus of Nazareth.

But many others — not only here — hold very different opinions and believe just as deeply and honestly in the very same God, the very same Jesus, and hold the same hope of salvation.

Not exact matches

This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.

What I find now, that is very interesting, are those of faith who say that Muslims don't pray to the same «God» as Christians or Jews.

Finally, you aren't even discussing your particular God character per se, you use a far more sweeping term, «Supernatural being», which would sweep in the very creatures and beings which you claim are as mythological — therefore, ironically, you confirm the analogy in the very same paragraph where you attempt to discredit it.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

The very same people who want nothing to do with God, are the very same ones who always submit the smug, sarcastic posts that mock Him.

@Vic, And that's all very nice (and according to the rules that «God» supposedly made compeltely possible as this universe does not allow one thing to be two things or two things to occupy the same space, but that's not really teh point here), but you didn't answer my question.

You said, «While you may feel certain that God does not exist, yet for the very same level of available evidence, another person is absolutely convinced of the existence of God.

Right through to this very day in the same center through Israel and Muslim belief we have Ishmael and Isaac sons of Abraham playing out the promise of God given to him.

the shortest answer to your question is the cross, where God tells us two things clearly: 1) we are much worse off than we want to admit (that's what I deserve)... but at the very same time... 2) we are much more loved than we ever dared hope (Jesus takes what I deserve)

your question is very valid and even i asked the same question, but from God and then He replied.

That same God will give you a new designation very soon in Jesus name.

The evil one used that same trick thousands of years ago... did God really say that... and doubt in Gods very Words was all it took.

It is very simple — you apply the same logic to every other god like Allah etc but refuse to apply the same logic to yours... which in turn makes you an atheist towards Allah... but since you make a exception for Jesus (I should also tell you to read some of Prof Bart Erhman — leading biblical scholar) this already makes your stance contradictory.

Reacting to the result on Wednesday, Archbishop of Sydney Dr Glenn Davies said in a video posted online: «Although this won't prevent me from continuing to teach that marriage, in God's good design, is between a men and a woman... the reality will be, in a very short period of time, our Parliament will legislate for same - sex marriage.»

Lastly, there is some irony in a person who accused me of «hiding behind ignorance» in conceding what I didn't know, but then turns around and relies on this very same ignorance as an erroneous form of support for their preferred non sequitur of «God did it.»

I agree that God didn't pursue Adam to smash his face in, never suggested that or alluded to it, but there is no confusion where sin leads and there is no doubt about the consequences off those who love their lives, they will lose it where as those that hate their lives will find it... So to conclude, Jesus and the father are not two different things, they are both the very same in as much as God desires all to be saved and has shown the way to salvation.

The same reasons BC condemns the readers and contributors to this forum — that we think, question, use our own God - given intelligence and reasoning skills, don't accept the easy answers, and are accepting of differences which create no harm — are the very things that make that notion quite bizarre.

So when they say Muslims and Christians don't worship the same God — they aren't talking theology (though they may ostensibly say they do)-- they simultaneous mean: our stories, our holidays, our worship, our customs, our songs, our politics and all that are very, very different.

So even though they were not charged (in the same way) with sin as it is now post law (where now Gods requirements are laid down and made very clear).

But in most various phrasing and with very differing emphasis, in the light of one pattern of thought or another, the same proclamation is being made; and always it comes down to this: that in the Man Jesus, in the totality of his life and action, God has been active, God has been present, in a definitive fashion, to the end that man may have life in him.

To say that it is not moral for man to do it but then say it is moral for god to do the same (or even more extreme action) means that you believe in divine command theory (look it up) which is a very dangerous concept and the argument is full of holes.

It is precisely this God, along with his humble task, which are together excluded from the chaosmos theorized by Deleuze, and it is the very same deity which appears in Whitehead's «first reference to the conception of God he will later elaborate and defend» (IWM 262).

The difficult yet incredible message of the cross: the very place we are most clearly shown what we deserve (worse than bear - mauling judgment) is the very same place we are shown the love & mercy of God (he takes what I deserve).

But for that matter, I do not quite accept the «atheism» of Marx or of the death - of - God theologians for the very same reason, namely, that their counter-arguments against traditional theism also take their point of departure from the dualistic framework.

Now, from the very sketchy review made of thought on God, we observe that they all stem from the same dualistic tradition.

Having spent the last ten years wrestling through some tough questions related to faith, heaven, hell, and salvation, I really appreciate the personal way in which Bell frames the conversation, asking the very questions I was so afraid to ask all those years and proclaiming the same hope I only dared believe — that God doesn't give up on people, that he is ever - loving, ever - redeeming, ever pursuing.

By faith Christians confess «that God has created me and all that exists,» which is something quite different than claiming to know that once upon a time in the far distant past God created the very same structures in which people now participate.

As a matter of theology, the word asserts that «whatever is divine» in Jesus, his deity, is as truly and fully divine as very God himself; but as a matter of religious conviction and experience, it is the assertion that very God, in all his mystery and in all his glory, is of «one substance with,» is the same reality as, that which in Jesus Christ we have been given to see and know and touch and feel.

PS — Brigitte: David's previous post was on that very same trickster God.

He further contends that such a God is very doubtfully God at all, since He is of the same order of being as we are and therefore not the Creator who is radically other than the creation.

So I was thrilled to learn that Wayne Jacobsen, one of my favorite authors (you must read his book So You Don't Want to Go to Church Anymore) and podcasters (check out his podcast, «The God Journey «-RRB-, was putting out a book by the very same title.

I'm saying that is is also illogical to conclude to that there is no God for the very same reason.

A God who lovingly welcomes all calls us to do the very same.

They felt God saying to them that a day would come when «the nations would again come to Salford and Salford would again go to the nations, from the very same place».

if you recall, God said, «Let us make man in our image AND after our likeness...... yes, every man still bears the image of God and deserves respect, but every man deserves to be pitied for the likeness of God which he has lost and which can only be restored through a relationship with Jesus Christ, who is more than a book, He is the Living Word of God, and any relationship with Him demands an obedience to the Word He represents, thus, how can a man «walk humbly with God» while at the same time rejecting the His very Word?

If there is a «treasury of the Church» (D 550 - 2,757,1541; Paul VI, Indulgentiarum Doctrina) which consists actually in the active union with God of all justified Christians, then this, too, makes it clear that all acts of those justified in the Holy Spirit constitute the very life of the Church, hence that the action of the Church is not the same as the action of her official representatives or what is done explicitly in their name.

Im not muslim but they believe in the same God that we do and we have very similar beliefs.

He goes on to mention three possible path, none of which seem very satisfactory, and concludes with, «Whichever of these paths one takes — and there are surely others — we are struggling with the same basic problem, trying to find some solution that will bring the God of the Old Testament into line with our modern God.»

Mohammed, the prophet of Islam was very clear in his writings that there is only one god, and that god is the same god that Christians and Jews worship.

Now these very same conservative evangelical Christian, god - fearing church goers, are willing to sleep with the enemy, the very group the preached so hard against, «Mormonism.»

I am attempting to furnish a very broad sketch of the variety of Indian Christian perception of God - Christ relations as a background for a more detailed appraisal of insights on the same subject from a mystical tradition of Islam.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

They refuse, reject and scorn God, then turn around and very arrogantly DEMAND an explanation from God whom they hate, while at the same time deny His existence.