Sentences with phrase «very same book»

Senator Boswell should already have been well aware of the scathing criticisms of Heaven + Earth, because he launched that very same book in May 2009, a good two weeks after a swathe of scientists had attacked its integrity.

Indeed, I still read the printed pages - what a wonderful smell, the feel of real paper, the rustling of it, the little notes I sometimes write next to the text (or used to), the ability to pass the same book, with inscriptions, to the children who might pass them on to theirs... and someday, those little hands that hold the very same book will associate a grandparent with it.

Lots of others are reading that very same book.

Not exact matches

Nathan one - upped me and told me that Foundr is creating a book for the very same reason!

As I said, authorship of most of the books of the Bible are in question and tend only to be variants of the other stories, roughly in the same time period and «neighborhood» — most often with no specific author — therefore it is very reasonable to think they are just variations on the same story.

@mama k» As I said, authorship of most of the books of the Bible are in question and tend only to be variants of the other stories, roughly in the same time period and «neighborhood» — most often with no specific author — therefore it is very reasonable to think they are just variations on the same story.»»

I picked this book up at the used book store and found the same thing: we may write very differently, but her passion drew me in.

So I was thrilled to learn that Wayne Jacobsen, one of my favorite authors (you must read his book So You Don't Want to Go to Church Anymore) and podcasters (check out his podcast, «The God Journey «-RRB-, was putting out a book by the very same title.

At the same time he has his own very serious reservations and questions, some of which are frankly stated in these particular books, as they are elsewhere in Adventures of Ideas and in some of the «table - talk» recorded by Lucien Price in the dialogues.

if you recall, God said, «Let us make man in our image AND after our likeness...... yes, every man still bears the image of God and deserves respect, but every man deserves to be pitied for the likeness of God which he has lost and which can only be restored through a relationship with Jesus Christ, who is more than a book, He is the Living Word of God, and any relationship with Him demands an obedience to the Word He represents, thus, how can a man «walk humbly with God» while at the same time rejecting the His very Word?

Supporters of religions are especially insidious in that they conveniently use as evidence the very same questionable holy books that are the point of the question.

He writes in book The Meaning of Marriage, «The gospel is this: We are more sinful and flawed than we ever dared believe, yet at the very same time we are more loved and accepted in Jesus Christ than we ever dared hope.»

If we engage in the «de-mythologizing» of the Revelation to St. John the Divine, as we must also «de-mythologize» the creation stories in the book Genesis in the Old Testament, we realize that what is being said is that as human existence and the world in which that existence is set has its origin in the circumambient, everlasting, faithful Love that is nothing other than God — we recall Wesley's hymn, quoted a few paragraphs back, that «his nature and his Name is Love», and Dante's great closing line in The Divine Comedy about «the Love that moves the sun and the other stars» — so also the «end» toward which all creaturely existence moves is that very same Love.

Indeed, a recent book even suggests that they must contain some of the very same particles.

One book with the same words, interpreted (or misinterpreted) very differently by three major religions with hundreds of sects, all insisting they each have the one and only set of true answers.

I think it's very easy to forget that the Bible is a book written for human beings, none of whom are exactly the same in circumstance, journey, thought or understanding.

He said 75 % of television shows are «not very good», but pointed out the same could be said of books.

«I have a tougher time using that â $ ˜guide bookâ $ ™ as a book to judge others with — concerning their faults — when they could very well read it for themselves and find the same things we are finding.»

I have a tougher time using that «guide book» as a book to judge others with — concerning their faults — when they could very well read it for themselves and find the same things we are finding.

it would seem — that all the authors of all the books were people who «believed» in the same imaginary god, understood the previously written books, followed very strict hebrew laws — and were motivated (inspired) to write.

Of course, having said that, this book tackles a very tough topic in a way that is still easier to read and understand than how this same topic is discussed within some of the «professionally formatted» books on the same topic.

(LONG FOOTNOTE CONTINUES: The same view is expressed in the very beautiful and moving book by John Baillie, Our Knowledge of God (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1939).

They can blame Satan for destroying their myths, but can't acknowledge that the very same guy may be tricking all of them with his book, the Bible.

Yes, Christians claim that their bible is «very clear» on sin and other things... but yet for some reason there are now thousands of different denominations all interpreting the same book differently.

I read a book recently where the author argued the very thing you are saying and it made me think the same thing.

I'm sorry you don't know JESUS very well, or the book of Isaiah: Don't you ever claim someone has slammed Judaism when YOU just did the same thing to CHRISTianity.

A bit about my book «Religious Literacy» (Americans are very religious, but know almost nothing about their own religions), a bit about my newest project, «God is Not One» (no, religions are not different paths up the same mountain) and some humor thrown in here and there.

These diverse writers each had very different target audiences, disparate life circumstances and specific agendas for their work; so we don't approach each book the same way — for the same reason you wouldn't read a poem about leaves the same way you read a botany textbook.

how does fair, unbiased CNN, AKA ACNN (Anderson Cooper News Network) pick and choose stories as noteworthy... a comment is made by a very elderly priest, probably not quoted properly, and is «front page news» on CNN's website... this same man (priest) has written many great books, done a lot of great charity work in the poorer parts of New York and nothing is ever posted on the website... but something is said incorrectly and its published... is this fair, is it right, is it unbiased or is the motivation to make an entire Church lokk bad and let the anti-Catholic screwballs have their heyday in hateful posts... I didn't see this wonderful netwrok post anything about the disgusting, bigoted and hateful attacks, written by the liberal left wing media elites, like Maureen Dowd, against Rep. Paul Ryan and his Catholic faith... it's all acceptable to you liberal HYPOCRITES!

These writers believed themselves to be inspired by the Spirit and called as teachers, and their writings, argues Wright, «were not simply about the coming of God's Kingdom into all the world; they were, and were designed to be, part of the means whereby that happened... Those who read these writings discovered, from very early on, that the books themselves carried the same power, the same authority in action, that had characterized the initial preaching of the «word.»

As a christian apologist, Chad, has 2000 years of «facts and testimony» to draw on to defend the delusion, not to the degree of proof or evidence; only to the point that a whole lot of people bought into the scam, therefore the scam is true based on the bible, why, because a 2000 year old book, that very same bible says so, which completes the circle.

Here once more, we find a passage from a Protestant who has long been taken to be the very antithesis of the liberal Protestant (and from the book that was written to be the death knell of liberal Protestantism), providing the same theological monism and skeptical epistemology that Milton first adumbrated and which led, at least in Milton's case, to the very liberal attitudes he had once so actively deplored.

From the very beginning of this discussion we have been dealing with the church, and I suspect that there is not a page in this book on which this word, or some other designating the same reality, does not appear.

I am French and cooking is very important in our culture (I think that's the same for you, but we are raised with cooking books ^ ^), and I just realized that you are teaching me how to cook properly.

I've found MS recipes are very hit or miss and have even found great discrepancies between the book and online versions of the same item!

Straight out of Everyday Raw Desserts (incidentally, off the very same page as those Hello Dolly bars), this gem alone is worth the price of the book, and then some.

I also felt VERY disappointed when I first read my copy of the SAME book and for the same reasons too Jac... that recipe however, looks LSAME book and for the same reasons too Jac... that recipe however, looks Lsame reasons too Jac... that recipe however, looks LUSH!

When Elneny joined he was full of confidence and that's how you assess a player when he's at his very best otherwise a guy like Ozil will be considered trash taking by his last performances yet everyone goes back to his memory books to assess Ozil and the same should happen with Elneny who won back to back player of the month when he first joined and scored that screamer against Barcelona yet his all round contribution that made the headlines then came Xhaka on board and that is exactly when Elneny's form started slightly dipping because simply his confidence was shaken by finding himself a regular bench warmer instead of a regular like he was before Xhaka joining and I don't think Wenger addressed this psychological issue with Elneny or even noticed it probably because he had enough issues of his own.

Every now and then, when it's been a very active day and it seems that I'm getting constant requests from each of my 3 children at the same time, pulling out some books helps us relax and focus.

As a child I remember my pop - up The Very Hungry Caterpillar by Eric Carle being the most frequently requested book by both myself and my brother at bedtimes and it's the same with my kids although I wish we still had the pop - up version from my childhood.

The infamous Der Stürmer publishing house put out a book of fables for children which included the very same tale from Aesop as Trump - «The Farmer and the Viper» — and, like Trump, they added a post script to the story which made it abundantly clear what it meant:

Accustomed as I am to the mendacities of politicians, even I am now faintly staggered that at the very same time as Baron Mandelson was trying to dismiss my book as fiction, he was furtively rushing together his own «memoir» which confirms by repetition several of the episodes first revealed in The End of the Party.

In the recently published book, The Coming Population Crash, and in a series of articles also for e360, environmental journalist Fred Pearce looks at the same demographic trends and sees very good news.

For example, a book of «recipes» for all facets of life, written by Dr. A.W. Chase, MD in 1866, lists ten formulations of salve, eight of which contain tallow, in addition to other natural ingredients.17 This same medical doctor quotes the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal of his day on using pure tallow for a «very common and very painful affliction,» an ingrown toenail.

So it's really just a carb tolerance test and actually Rob Wolf talks about this in his book as well, where based on some research out of Israel, there was a study done following 800 different people and they found that you could give two people the exact same carbohydrate source whether it's sweet potato or bread or lentils and they would have very different postprandial glucose responses.

I was amazed to find it's sandwiched between Homo Deus and Sapiens, two very well - known books by the same author and it shared the list with The Undoing Project and The Hidden Life of Trees and some other very net worthy books.

Finally I stumbled upon the Secrets of The Mommyhood: Everything I wish someone had told me about pregnancy, childbirth and having a baby by Heather Alexander, book that is very informative and hilarious at the same time!

You may even find yourself waiting in line to pick up the train tickets to Milan you booked three months in advance, only to realize that everyone in front of you is also trying to get on that very same train because it's the last one leaving the station due to a train strike that day.

Those who have devoured the swervy, same - named Douglas Adams books could very well find themselves immensely entertained.

I know because I looked at a creepy picture in a photo album... oh yes, I know that I've seen that same picture of the man 20 feet tall in the main hallway, but it didn't register that he was my great grandfather until I saw the small picture in the book... because a face like that is so very generic, so it took me awhile to finally realize that it was indeed my greatgrandfather... I've said it before and I'll say it again WHAT THE HELL!!?!?? Ahem.