Sentences with phrase «very same character»

Apparel, action figures, princesses and other toys are so many examples of how much money Disney can generate from the very same character.

It's obvious that when a film begins with a pilot in training that this very same character will be called upon in a time of desperation.

Not exact matches

The line between vigilante and terrorist seems to be very thin indeed, especially in a game where the main character is supposed to be heroic yet at the same time can do some amazingly unheroic things.

Finally, you aren't even discussing your particular God character per se, you use a far more sweeping term, «Supernatural being», which would sweep in the very creatures and beings which you claim are as mythological — therefore, ironically, you confirm the analogy in the very same paragraph where you attempt to discredit it.

In fairness, however, there have been some characters posting here who attack Christians in very much the same way, labeling all of them evil.

Both questions lead in the same direction, toward the possibility of a provisional and qualified answer: if the character of happening only once is held to belong to the truth and measure of all things in their very reality, then there is indeed an essence which more than any other satisfies this truth - criterion, and this is the pure essence of time: time taken in itself, or pure movement — movement irrespective of any possible differentiation into the different kinds of movement.

However, once evolution had started to go in those directions, this defined the character of the natural selection that would be exerted, and evolutionary changes went on in the same direction for a very long period.

In this way, according to the very same manner as their secular contemporaries, the Church Fathers came to apply the term persona to the characters portrayed in the sacred texts of Christianity.

In the very same way, all categories of being (excluding substance) depend for their being on the underlying existence of substances and are therefore secondary in character — Aquinas calls them accidents (because they happen in substances).

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

It was an incredibly fitting way for him to bring up his 65th pole and although in terms of talent you can put him in the same bracket as Senna, when it comes to character the two are very different.

At the same time, you very much know it's against the rules to sell your autograph, and every time you do so, you risk getting caught doing it, especially since those you're dealing with aren't necessarily going to be of the highest moral character, and it only takes one to turn you in.

«It is very curious that paragraph 4 (1) of the recommendations of the Kingibe panel prescribes that a serving director should be picked as the director - general, only for the same characters that sat in judgment over the need to reorganise the NIA, turning around to violate its own recommendations, by picking one of them to contemptuously assume duty as head of the NIA.

I happen to agree with your point of view very very much but at the same time I always feel that her outfits look more like an effortless extension of the character.

While the previous films in the series have been just that — parts of a sequence designed to get us here, each with their own beginning and end — the first and second parts of Deathly Hallows are two halves of the same film, and to approach them as separate entities means missing just what director David Yates, writer Steve Kloves, and a host of storytellers and performers have done: They've made a five - hour fantasy epic that balances effects - driven battles with some very real character moments, and one that isn't afraid to have its heroes pay a high price for their convictions.

Rachelle Lefevre is from Revolution and plays pretty much the same type of character she did in that show and its very generic so i have no idea how much she can bring to her work.

The very seemingly innocent variation of having to start fresh from your last game save without your stuff in hand and having to go back and get it with a «new» character makes it very frustrating and challenging at the same time.

I'm very excited that we all get to meet up in a couple of weeks for Season 2 with a lot of the same actors, but different characters.

A key incentive is meant to be unlocking each of the 80 - odd different characters, but not only does this mean repeating the same missions over and over again but there's very little meaningful variety outside the first handful of main characters.

During this recent interview to discuss the TV version of Zombieland, co-creators and executive producers Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick talked about the journey from TV series to movie and now back to TV pilot, what it's been like to work with Amazon, what motivated the decision to have the same characters from the movie on the TV show, how they envision it as a road show, how much gore they can have, what Kirk Ward (who was originally cast as Tallahassee before being replaced by Woody Harrelson) brings to this version of the character, what led them to the 30 - minute format, whether they could have any surprise cameos (Bill Murray made a very memorable one in the film), what will determine whether the pilot is successful enough to go to series, and when they might know if they're picked up.

Analysis: Director Jonathan Glazer turned a lot of heads with his debut feature, the gritty crime drama Sexy Beast, a movie that shocked and impressed with its unique story and characters, so the thought that his follow - up could fail to deliver on those very same elements is surprising.

Not because it's about two people (a very good Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams) of the same sex who fall in love with one another, but because it neither rushes its story (about a woman who returns to her Jewish Orthodox community to bury her late father and reignites her passions with a childhood friend) or judges its characters.

One wonders why Garland — who read the book once, wrote the script based on his «dream memory» of it, and completely ignored its sequels (both of which were published in the same year as Annihilation)-- felt the need to give Lena some of the most prosaic motivation you can give to a cinematic character, but its very irrelevance forgives it.

The new Tinker Bell movies have very little to do with the classic character who shares that name and likeness, but the two scantily clad pixies are ostensibly one in the same.

While the same can't be said for Mirren, whose character could have been played more convincingly by a host of fine French actresses, she is very likeable in the role, speaking all of her lines in English with a regality and refined quality that has been her bread and butter for many a year.

Audiences has spent upwards of a decade changing into emotionally invested in lots of of those similar characters, and the MCU itself has completely modified the blockbuster panorama over that very same time.

As far as the details of the character are concerned, Mayhew is very different from Faulkner, whose experiences in Hollywood were not the same at all.

It's an ideal role for Rampling, not only because she can stare down anybody, but also because we can imagine she's playing the same character she played from «The Night Porter,» only 40 very angry years later.

We're watching him watch his unrealized dream, one that's still achievable for characters contained within the very same frame.

The script isn't as smart as the previous film and has too many «dumb character» moments if only because it would take some very questionable actions to have a virus break out in the same place twice.

Civil War screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely - who also wrote the first two Captain America movies - not only tackle very complicated subject matter (the issue of accountability on not just a political level, but also a personal one) but at the same time have to introduce important new characters (more on them later) and carve out room to give the supporting cast enough onscreen development so that they're not just making glorified cameos during this movie.

Not to tell the same story again, but to pursue where the lives of these very different characters lead, with an audience which already holds them in great affection.»

Wan and his screenwriters very purposefully hit many of the same beats as the first film, presenting us with a set - up that often feels too similar, and disappoints by comparison because O'Connor's character isn't given nearly the depth of Lili Taylor's in the original.

This is surely supported by the casting of Seinfeld's Harris and Everybody Loves Raymond's Garrett, who are very much in those same television roles but are lacking the character history and strong writing to actually birth comedy.

At the same time, Wet Hot American Summer has an endearing sense of familiarity, making it very easy to relate to all of the characters.

This time, Nicholas Stoller's directing and Jason Segel wrote and stars in what I think is supposed to be a comedy along the same lines — you know, clever banter, «normal guy» characters who we can relate to, and some very R - rated humor that goes over just fine despite its raunchiness because, somehow, they make it work.

The secret to not make it too confusing for new players lays in the fact that all characters have the same combos, but their moves and finishers are very much different.

Director David Robert Mitchell deals in wild abstractions while still managing a very real grip on reality, allowing his characters to live on a plane of existence parallel to ours, rightfully ripe with many of the same headaches.

Indeed, Hoult made for a much more alluring animal than Kelsey Grammer (who played the same character in Brett Ratner's X-Men: The Last Stand), and, despite the movie's flaws, he brought a very necessary vulnerability to the famously introspective character.

The old characters are there, they have the same old moves that you're oh so very familiar with, and the graphic style and fidelity feels almost exactly as I remember it from the middle of the last generation.

For an industry that's always trying to emphasize the universality of white stories and how relatable it is for us to see characters as, «just like, human» it's very telling that they don't offer the same rhetoric for a film that's primarily black actors.

This adaptation of Stephen King's 2009 doorstop of the same name features all the familiar characters: James «Big Jim» Rennie (Dean Norris), a used - car salesman who is second selectman of Chester's Mill and would very much like to be first selectman; Dale «Barbie» Barbara (Mike Vogel), a former Army captain in town on some sort of business; Deputy Linda (Natalie Martinez), the kindhearted cop; lovely Angie (Britt Robertson) who has a regrettable fling with not - so - lovely «Junior» (Alexander Koch); intrepid newspaper reporter Julia Shumway (Rachelle Lefevre); and so on...

The art - style is the same heavily anime - inspired art that we saw in Fire Emblem Fates, and while the 3D models replicate this style perfectly, hit - effects are very basic and character models constantly clip through the environment in awkward ways.

But Crowe cuts corners in establishing their chemistry: Instantly and inexplicably smitten with her charge, Allison emerges from the same fantasy factory that produced the Kirsten Dunst character in Elizabethtown, for whom this very site coined the Manic Pixie Dream Girl title.

Binaries has this very same mentality, but you control two characters at the same time!

If Nintendo get a solid server up and running and allow for multiplayer on the same console im sure this will become very successful here but the game is very difficult solo and without the «leveling» up of characters even grinding can become tedious.

I went to the set once, which was kind of strange, a bit like déjà vu, with Richard and Agyness there, but it was very much for me, it was their movie, Richard was playing this character and he was going to play it in a certain way that was going to be different from the people that I worked with, and that's great, because why would you want to do the same thing again?

It's more (and less) of the same, which means a bunch of socially awkward settings where a character is embarrassed by something sexually dumb they did, but that still proves very trustworthy for a laugh.

I feel the same way, in fact I really like the Samus one it reminds me of the new Smash game as the character model is very similar.

The Queen of Hearts outfit is quite loosely dependent around the character with the very same identify through the book, but occasionally costumes can consist of components through the red - colored Queen's outfit as well, which was an altogether several character through the sequel to Alice In Wonderland, referred to as via The searching Glass.