Sentences with phrase «very same claims»

«IPCC Chairman Pachauri was making public comments on a dispute involving factual claims by the IPCC at the same time that he was negotiating for funding to his home institution justified by those very same claims.»

2) most medicine men throughout history along with snake oil salesmen have made the very same claims of being magical in manner.

Lei said that the Mi 4 is the fastest smartphone in the world, that's the very same claim he made when the Mi 3 was launched in September last year.

Not exact matches

At least one of those hacks claimed to use a password of his that was exposed in a 2012 LinkedIn breach, which implied that Zuckerberg had been using the same password for multiple sites and hadn't changed it in years — two very basic privacy blunders.

This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.

Scientific claims rest on the idea that experiments repeated under nearly identical conditions ought to yield approximately the same results, but until very recently, very few had bothered to check in a systematic way whether this was actually the case.

Finally, you aren't even discussing your particular God character per se, you use a far more sweeping term, «Supernatural being», which would sweep in the very creatures and beings which you claim are as mythological — therefore, ironically, you confirm the analogy in the very same paragraph where you attempt to discredit it.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

Point is, the people who claim that the date has been found and the people who claim that it can not be found are quoting from the very same Bible.

Society was by this time well prepared to accept this measure although it was claimed that it was not at all the same as marriage despite being modelled very closely on the Marriage Act.

By faith Christians confess «that God has created me and all that exists,» which is something quite different than claiming to know that once upon a time in the far distant past God created the very same structures in which people now participate.

He thought the best way to be a Christian and a writer was to try to be a very good writer (while, at the same time, avoiding any claim to being a good Christian).

REGARDLESS OF AUTHORSHIP (last week's debate), it is factually demonstrable that the FINAL FORM of the NT considers the God of the OT to be the VERY SAME God it is writing about (against Dr Baden's claim).

And these same fools claim «American exceptionalism» when we're getting far behind the remainder of the world in math and science, the very things that could actually save us.

the very family you claim makes you compassionate would then be equally subjected to division by those same categories (race, gender, socio - economic status, etc.).

As Pete reminds us, his proposed economic and taxation plans may even end up hurting the very same ordinary Americans he claims to espouse.

While claiming that the whole of creation has as its very structure the Sabbath principle, Barth qualifies this statement by suggesting that creation (through its culmination in the Sabbath rest) paints also to redemptive history (to covenant) and to the final consummation of the same.

Yes, when it comes to things like percentages of «Christians» as a majority of Americans the tent is extended as large as it can get, but in other issues the t.itle «Christian» seems to be claimed by a very small group of fundamentalists who have great conviction that Mormons, Catholics, mainstream protestants and orthodox aren't really Christians like they are and thus doomed to the same hellish fate that other non-Christians are.

Some like John Jay tried all at once the strategies of ignoring, overwhelming and inventing when he claimed that the emerging republic was «one connected country» and «one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in manners and customs.»

The jews just worship the god these folks are the prophets of, althou some claim jesus is the son of that very same god and therefore better — if a son of a god can die so easily, whats the point i ask you!

However, in a recently published paper, this same author makes some very different claims about the age of geological features of the Australian landscape.

Yet, instead of believing in a Creator and Intelligent Design, you, the science and fact believer, go against the very basic rules of your same scientific beliefs and claim the Universe was NOT created, it just poofed into existence from nothing.

In Matthew 23:29 - 35, Jesus explains that the religious people who claim they would not have participated in murdering the prophets are the very same people who are planning to kill the prophets of their own day.

Yes, Christians claim that their bible is «very clear» on sin and other things... but yet for some reason there are now thousands of different denominations all interpreting the same book differently.

The new article's authors claim the original scholar committed «classification errors» because some of the same - sex relationships were very brief, even evanescent affairs, and so what he should have done is what they proceed to do: toss out data until they get a handful of same - sex households where a couple stayed together at least several years.

But on the same day, he also revoked the very kind of policy that promoted the «purple» governance he claimed to want, e.g., Bush's directive that funding priority be given to funding non embryonic — and hence, societally uniting sources of pluripotent stem cells — even though they had already been discovered in the induced pluripotent stem cell breakthrough.

I'm sorry you don't know JESUS very well, or the book of Isaiah: Don't you ever claim someone has slammed Judaism when YOU just did the same thing to CHRISTianity.

Are not Jews and Christians perennially bound together in theological conflict by the very nature of their faith, both claiming election by the one and same God?

This case poses some very significant legal and theological problems: Are the churches claiming same kind of special privilege?

Would you still be making the same argument, unless you claim that any new DM would not be injured at the same time as the existing player, which will be a very laughable argument.

So, some have said, why is it right that the players and coaches on the Division V winner can make the same claim as the Open Division winner («We're the champs») when the Open team is very likely so much better?

How adamant Rodgers was that Sterling wasn't for sale, claiming that he «wouldn't get the same opportunities» at other clubs really made Liverpool look like a very small fish in a big pond.

Such thinking leads to or supports things like far - right Hindu nationalism, for example, or absurd claims that epistemic violence is the same or worse (as Spivak once famously claimed) than actual violence, or harmful rejections of science, or the very essentialism denied by its proponents.

Furthermore, Fedele conflates state lawmakers from New York City with city lawmakers from New York City: «18 of the 19 corrupt Senators and Assembly members cited by the commission represented districts from within that very same New York City matching system,» he claims.

We find it very bizarre that the Hon. Attorney - General, Ms Gloria Akufo, who assured the entire citizenry of her commitment to fairness and strict adherence to ethical principles at her vetting not too long ago, will claim that she exercised the said constitutional discretion on grounds merely that there was a lack of evidence to prosecute the case in question when indeed, the Siting Judge, Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from same.

When Liberals next claim that they care more than you, remind them that their party opposed almost every social reform introduced by those very same one nation conservatives.

Responding the ad, National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Ken Spain said, «The very same site that Owens uses to back up his claim in his ad shows that he votes with his party 93 percent of the time.»

As chair of the SIGOMA MP's group, it was therefore with some dismay that I considered the announcements in the spending review that appear to have the potential to follow the same pattern and penalise the very communities that government has claimed it wishes to protect.

Thatcher's private secretary Lord Powell kick - started a very Conservative row with an article in the Sunday Times which claimed the former PM would have would have «raged more mightily» at Brussels - but would ultimately have settled for the same concessions won by David Cameron.

Lewis wrote, He's either a lunatic for making such outrageous claims, yet every other thing about his life was very sane.In addition, the Dead Sea Scrolls provide proof that the words we see in Scripture today are the same words written in the Bible thousands of years ago.God spoke through His people to write the Bible and it's still changing lives every single day for those who meditate on it.

It is very identical to intrrracialdatingcentral.com and some claim they both share the same members and are run by the same team.

Though Wikipedia claims he's nearing 60, Regan feels very much the middle - aged everyman, belonging to the same generation as Louis C.K. and Jim Gaffigan, comics ten years or so his junior.

The legislature has willingly and knowingly severely underfunded urban school districts like Bridgeport for decades, but now wants to potentially point their finger at those very same cities and claim they are at fault for the performance of their public schools while allowing the proliferation of charter schools, which this year alone drained $ 5 million dollars from the BPS.

The man very same man who claims to be «The Most Trusted Educator in America» is also working diligently to become a member of the 1 % by regularly leaving his job as a school principal to go on lucrative public speaking engagements throughout the country and creating a new charter school franchise.

Well, suffice it to say that individuals and groups associated with the defendants are sounding off through the comment process, and they are making very strong claims to the general effect that DOJ's efforts to protect consumers against ebook price - fixing are misguided, because the DOJ should instead be protecting the interests and the distribution infrastructure of the same publishers who colluded with Apple to raise ebook prices by 30 to 100 percent back in 2010.

By that very same logic Amazon could claim that the Kindle supports EPUB format via Calibre conversion to MOBI.

At the same time, it would seem that the way you can claim critical illness is such that most of the time you can claim it, you are almost very disabled or near death.

As for housing, there's very few countries in the world which can genuinely claim to be too densely populated... and the same's true for housing.

In that same study, 34 % of wives who were surveyed claimed to be largely satisfied with the relationships they had with their spouses, identifying themselves as «happy» or «very happy.»

There are very few asset classes that can make this same claim.