Sentences with phrase «very same conclusion»

The problem is that the fossil fuel industry has come to the very same conclusion, and delay — of carbon pricing and renewable energy incentives — has become top of its agenda too.

It seems we have those «computer models» going again, you know, the garbage in garbage out ones where some scientists «conveniently» arrive at a conclusion and then feed in data to ensure the «computer model» arrives at that very same conclusion......

It seems that SEGA and Creative Assembly have come to this very same conclusion, officially announcing the game while admitting in the press release that the announcement has come a bit earlier than planned.

It seems that SEGA and Creative Assembly have come to this very same conclusion, officially announcing the game while admitting in the press release that the announcement has come a bit earlier -LSB-...]

SSB still comes to the very same conclusion, McNamara ordered now the third time to start over.

Not exact matches

Using this lens, we draw the same conclusion: It's very early — the equivalent of where the internet was in the early to mid-1990s.

To rush biblical statements into this arena, as though they were of the same order as Charles Darwin's Origin of Species or Stephen Jay Gould's The Panda's Thumb, or as though scientific conclusions could be drawn from them, is to be very confused about what it is the Genesis materials are teaching.

@Keith, I have very bit of confidence that you'll soon come to the same conclusion I did about fishon aka The Troll.

Go look up for yourselves secular studies on how much an average (this means typical, as opposed to your very ILLOGICAL use of anecdotal evidence to draw conclusions or simply spouting the same thing you read in a combox somewhere) Christian gives of his own time and treasure to charitable causes versus an average atheist.

But two people can be listening to the same conversations for years on end and still reach very different conclusions, me included.

In case you're interested, I've been thinking very much along the same lines as you concerning writing and publishing, and come to the same conclusions.

A visitor to our shores would probably come to the same conclusion at which St. Paul arrived in regard to the Athenians, namely, that we are «very religious.»

If you really want my thoughts on why I oppose Hinduism, I'll tell you, but it'll just be you and me coming to the same conclusion using two very different paths to get there.

I think science will proceed in that general direction, but I am not quite convinced that it will come to exactly the same conclusions as Whitehead does — partly because I find it very difficult to make up my mind what those conclusions are.

Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby (Gen 18:2 NIV)»... Furthermore, there is a good reason to study the old Orient, the rituals and cultures of the Middel East, especially at that time,,, i myself being Half Egyptian and having been raised there, am blessed with this foreknowledge for certain things that are still the same way now as they were at th etime of Jesus and earlier,,, where Men kiss to greet one another for example,,, so when King David talks about the love of Jonathan being greater than that of a woman,,, and at the same time knowing that the Hebrew litreature (as the Arabian culture to quite an extent still is) was very poetic and used éndless symbols and parabels to express an idea,,, one might do himself a favor not jumping to conclusions which satisfy only his very own ideas and thoughts,,, the biggest problem with Bible interpretations lately is Verses ripped out of the context and interpreted in such a way that has nothing to do with its original context... «To the law and to the testimony!

I kept asking the same question because if we're going to have an honest discussion and reach a conclusion, it's a very relevant question that people were repeatedly refusing to answer.

It's interesting to see how different sportsbooks can take very different paths to reach the same conclusion.

If this is the same benchmark that will be applied for Enrique this year, then the only conclusion that can be 100 % derived is that we are in for one very interesting season indeed.

Other publications like The Media Elite (1986) and Press Bias and Politics (2002) also come to the same conclusion in very different political times and climates.

«The results of our study are compelling because using two very different methods, they arrived at the same conclusion.

Attempts to assess more important differences (of any number of cognitive abilities, for example) between groups always come to the same very well - known conclusion — that the differences between individuals within one racial group are much larger than the differences between the average members of two such groups.

«Not all the studies we looked at reached the same conclusion, but generally what we found is that the association between a higher consumption of trans fats and a higher risk for heart disease and [early] death was very consistent,» said study author Russell de Souza.

I know you have covered flax seeds in the past, but I think that repeat info when new studies also support the same conclusions are very helpful.

This is not the first time I have seen Dr. Greger reach conclusions not supported by the very same evidence he's presenting!

But that might well translate into a wider audience for this flawed yet confident and polished Netflix drama, which arrives at the same conclusion as the earlier film: Hazing is a very bad thing.

The committee tosses out every exit - exam study (save three) that has ever been conducted on the grounds that it is not possible «to draw causal conclusions about the overall effects of test - based incentives» (that is, the very same criteria the committee ignored in considering school - level accountability).

Around 1995, an article in the ANWB journal (ANWB is the Dutch equivalent of the AA - or the AAA in the American case) reached more or less the same conclusion that distance was not very important.

What we always about is some lead / lag indicators (which may a very simple one like TTM / current P / E or a very complex model) and then we theorise based upon the model which we use and that there are enough empirical studies done on the same thing which help you to come to a reasonable conclusion about the findings of your theory / hypothesis.

I would estimate that a very small proportion of the population are in this position and so I probably won't run the exact numbers and devise specific strategies, but my conclusion would probably still remain largely the same.

From the Conclusions: «When valuations are very high, as they are today, the stocks have a substantial downside risk and they are likely to do about the same as a 100 % TIPS portfolio.»

A number of studies were conducted over the last decade and each came to the same conclusion: There is very little difference in the heat efficiency between a brick - to - brick new window replacement and a retrofitted window combined with a storm window, as long as the windows were low - E.

Both ways probably end up with roughly the same conclusions but they get to those conclusions in very different ways.

As to the RPG elements, Automata has three playable characters, each with the different point of view on the same story and sometimes very distinct conclusions as well.

In its entirety, Invitation at Ribordy Contemporary has the final result to simultaneously present five artists who, approximately born in the same period, bring the medium of painting at some very distant conclusions.

What follows here, then, is a sprint through some of the artistic and curatorial highlights and low points, in search of commonalities, contradictions, and the ultimate conclusions to be drawn from three very different iterations of more or less the same idea: wresting art from the thrall of the market and restoring it to a conscientious existence.

In this case, what accounts for all the evidence is the very simple and logical conclusion that the cooling was caused by the same sort of natural variation that's cooled the planet on countless other occasions, prior to the industrial revolution.

It's not that Gavin's argument is wrong, but rather that it omits separate, independent evidence that reinforces the same conclusion from a very different angle.

These trends are derived from exactly the same data as those used in the original figure, that was used to argue that the global warming had stopped — by two professors and a statistician, the very same who performed curve - fitting and removed data not fitting their conclusion.

Using essentially the same IPCC model projections, the two studies come to very different conclusions with regard to key projected quantities, such as the seasonally - integrated powerfulness of TCs or «power dissipation index» (PDI).

Both papers come to the same broad conclusion, summarized in our figure, that unless humankind puts on the brakes very quickly and aggressively (i.e. global reductions of 80 % by 2050), we face a high probability of driving climate beyond a 2 °C threshold taken by both studies as a «danger limit».

As someone who moved from a megalopolis to very large cities to (now) a rural town smaller than your hometown, I've reached the same conclusion as you.

I recall that there were several people on another blog attempted this very same modeling exercise and came to vastly different conclusions.

Unfortunately the very reason you think that they should include Steve in their work, which is that their work would lead to the right conclusion, is the same reason they don't.

But it does gets the same result as a study that reached the same sorts of conclusions w / a very different sample — «563 (369 female) New York University undergraduates» (Feygina, I., Jost, J.T. & Goldsmith, R.E. System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of «System - Sanctioned Change».

Six years after a report from the Royal Society in the United Kingdom reached many of the same conclusions, the American scientists decided to issue two reports — to distinguish as forcefully as they could between two very different approaches that for years have been lumped together under the heading «geoengineering.»

To finally get to my point: very experienced people can come to startingly different conclusions based on the same evidence (even in matters as simple as who bears responsibility for a golf ball going through a passing motorist's windscreen.)

I totally understand the point on uncertainty at observation stations, but also Anthony's conclusions depend on the very same single station.

McIntyre cited a conclusion from the very same page Mann was quoting from, yet Mann claims it was a misrepresentation.

So I am understanding this correctly: the reanalysis is very dubious, as none of the observational studies yield the same conclusion.

Were you happy with the TAR's conclusion which was the same except with a likely rather than very likely.