Sentences with phrase «very same judges»

Rather than disparaging with politically motivated sound bites the very same judges our government continues to appoint, the Minister could lead by example by demonstrating a desire to pay heed to the increasing messages from the bench decrying mandatory minimum penalties and uncollectable surcharges.

And yet we hear the very same judges complaining about diminished resources and ridiculous wait times.

The risk is that diversity of opinion, so vital to the healthy development of the law, may be relegated to the occasional murmur, particularly so if the very same judges who sit on a majority of sentence appeals insist on inflexible adherence to horizontal stare decisis and maintain that their judgments, being «first at bat», must be followed by their colleagues.

Not exact matches

@ doobz: hypocrite = (literally) «less judging» (of yourself) in other words, the hypocrite is blind to how he / she does the very same thing (even if in a more nuanced way)

But Jesus does not judge by outward appearances, and He often chooses the shameful, the lowly, and the foolish — the very same people we would reject.

«Therefore, you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, do the very same thing.»

I think he's getting a very good idea on how fast and harsh christians will judge someone who doesn't continue chanting the same magic spells and talking about the same mythology as they believe.

«I have a tougher time using that â $ ˜guide bookâ $ ™ as a book to judge others with — concerning their faults — when they could very well read it for themselves and find the same things we are finding.»

I have a tougher time using that «guide book» as a book to judge others with — concerning their faults — when they could very well read it for themselves and find the same things we are finding.

For in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, practice the very same thing» (Romans 2:1).

correct me if I am wrong but does nt this law that is quite flawless state judge not less thou be judged by that very same standard?

As for that erosion, recent data from the World Values Survey tells us that only 30 percent of U.S. millennials (i.e., those born after 1980) think it «essential» to live in a democracy; 24 percent of those same millennials think democracy a «bad» or «very bad» way to run a country; and only 19 percent judge it «illegitimate» for the military to take over when the government is incompetent or failing to do its job.

I do find it quite comforting that the very One who will be judging us, is that same one who forgave us from the cross.

But with precisely the same cast of argument, the judges will need to settle their answer to the question of just what is their principled ground for turning back these other demands that spring from the very reasoning they bring forward as they detach marriage from that central notion of begetting.

So, with that said... I'm all for taking each individual and judging them as I get to know them, but at the same time being very wary as to certain radical ideological groups that may wish to do us harm.

Therefore you have no excuse, O man, whoever you are, when you judge another; for in passing judgment you condemn yourself, because you the judge are doing the very same things.

As I contemplate the church today, I would judge it to be an institution in very serious trouble; every mainline denomination is faced with the same agonies of declining membership.

The apostle Paul makes the very same appeal to «natural» and «unnatural,» in the context of gender roles, when he argues that women should wear head coverings: «Judge for yourself,» he writes, «Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?

For in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, practice the very same things.

There is indeed no good reason to doubt their origin (in approximately if not precisely this same form) in the very historical episode itself; nor is Miriam's role as in some sense leader and conductor of the spontaneous demonstration in any way implausible (compare, for example, the Song of Deborah in Judges 5).

I do find it very comforting, though, that the One who will be judging who goes where, is the same one who forgave us from the Cross and who died for us.

Thus presbyters were becoming priests at the very same time they were relinquishing their corporate judicial and disciplinary authority in the bishop's church, while the bishop had become the chief judge; and the law itself was being codified in canons at councils at which bishops alone decreed.

Her sayings were mingled with naive words, but at the same time with sublime meanings like, «I was sent by God, from whom I came...» Her words, «You tell me you are my judge; ponder with great care over what you mean to do, for in very truth I was sent of God, and you are putting yourself in great jeopardy,» (Ibid., p. 76.)

Please don't judge, and I will do the same, for lurking in your fridge are probably a few bottles of sauces with very questionable ingredients.

This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does not want to get caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line - up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just not right though it will win you some matches due to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am not judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my word even if he has good games.

Judging our players, there is something very wrong with spirit in team, Ramsey our best player last season, is so bad that he couldnt make in burnleys 11, same goes to cazorla, but this is happening since 2011, our passing game is nowhere near it should be, and real problem is that we do nt have players to do passing game, we have fastest players in epl and we are not using that, why?

I think that if you never get judged by others for your parenting, you either only hang out with people exactly the same as you, and you are perfect in living out your convictions, or you hang out only with people who are non-judgemental (very rare).

We find it very bizarre that the Hon. Attorney - General, Ms Gloria Akufo, who assured the entire citizenry of her commitment to fairness and strict adherence to ethical principles at her vetting not too long ago, will claim that she exercised the said constitutional discretion on grounds merely that there was a lack of evidence to prosecute the case in question when indeed, the Siting Judge, Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from same.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer invoked the same case in voicing «very serious doubts» about the Colorado judge.

Please don't judge, and I will do the same, for lurking in your fridge are probably a few bottles of sauces with very questionable ingredients.

It has been a very interesting journey for me, coming from a cold person who judged and criticized everyone to an open and loving person who is dedicated to serving my community and helping others make the same transition that I went through.

Not because it's about two people (a very good Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams) of the same sex who fall in love with one another, but because it neither rushes its story (about a woman who returns to her Jewish Orthodox community to bury her late father and reignites her passions with a childhood friend) or judges its characters.

But, looked at objectively (or, as objectively as possible when judging any piece of artistic expression) we're looking at a completely average, by - the - books, documentary that reveals very little real insight, and keeps hitting the same point over and over ad nauseam.

In Body Double, his 1984 erotic thriller that the critics were much too quick to judge and discard, Brian De Palma succeeded in creating an unforgettable film that at the same time pays an obvious tribute to the works of Alfred Hitchcock and remains somehow completely his own, coherent with his very own stylistic preferences and vision of filmmaking.

When all students are then judged and graded against the same year - level expectations, some students are advantaged and others are disadvantaged by their very different starting points.

By the same token, we can't judge our schools solely by how well students perform on assessments in the very first year of such a sweeping new initiative as the Common Core.

On the very same day the dilettantes were oohing and aahing at the bazillion - dollar restorations on the other side of the country at the Hilton Head Island Concours, where judges were tisk - tisking the...

Judging the covers in the same subgenre (romantic suspense) was very revealing because the direction I and my co-writers were heading got, at most, 3 - 4 from me.

Breeding the best dogs we can with the available resources, then preparing and showing those dogs to their very best advantage to the judge whilst the other exhibitors in the ring with us are doing the very same is all part of competing in the show ring to be awarded as the closest on the day to meeting the breed standard.

In response I explained my reasoning, and still feel that my old disclosure policy (which explicitly mentioned Amazon Associates revenue) gave readers the information they needed to judge any possible conflicts of interest, but I've made it even more explicit so there's no mystery as to how I make (not very much) money from this site: Google Adsense, Amazon Associates, blog subscriptions, and personal referral links to sites like TopCashBack (the same links anyone else gets when they open an account).

As far as the remaster goes, judging from side - by - side comparisons textures are a lot sharper, but other than that it looks very much the same.

The point is that most basic science pursues questions generated by basic science and judged by those same scientists, a path - dependent approach that has disconnected itself from the challenges and opportunities — the many small but very real problems associated with developing effective, scalable solutions to climate change.

«We have not yet been freed from this, but we feel that there is some hope for our case and are very grateful to the judge and pray that the PUC makes the same decision,» said Winona LaDuke, executive director of Native American environmental organization Honor the Earth.

The percentage of black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) judges grew from 6 % to 7 % in the same period prompting Lord Thomas, the lord chief justice, to say that he remains «very concerned» about the recruitment of BAME judges.

The flexibility and the efficiency of mediation can be preserved while, in the very same system, the wisdom and legal knowledge of an experienced judge can continue to be applied when necessary.

For example, the following are ignored by lawyers and judges: (1) the «system integrity concept» of the e-records provisions of the Ontario and Canada Evidence Acts; (2) the National Standards of Canada for e-records management, which are based upon the same concept; and, (3) the fact that the work of experts in e-records management systems (ERMS's) is based on that very same concept, which states: proof of e-records «integrity» requires proof of the integrity of the ERMS in which the records are stored: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) OEA & s. 31.2 (1) CEA.

Therefore is VERY IMPORTANT that you hire a lawyer to negotiate your plea who: (a) knows his / her way around the Crown Counsel Policy Manual and the loopholes, gaps or shortcomings in same; and (b) knows the parameters and past habits of the Judges and Courts involved in similar cases; and (c) is well respected by the Crown and the Courts; ALL of these factors are important in ensuring that you get the BEST POSSIBLE DEAL and also in obtaining for you the lowest possible sentence and the sentence that best fits your circumstances and needs.

The SRL usually is not versed in legalese and when they tell the facts or make argument using everyday language that says the exact same thing the legalese says the judges pretend not to understand (in some cases they actually may not understand, I find them often very unaware of basic legal principles) so they take the easy and safest way out by saying the one word that works for them - dismissed.

The Tax Court is a branch of the Federal Court and the tax disputes that go before that body are substantially the same as any other court: there is a judge, there are witnesses and documentary evidence, counsel represents the taxpayer (other than in very minor disputes involving less than $ 12,000 called the «informal procedure») and Crown counsel represents the CRA.

Barry «is a very active judge at oral argument, which is usually a sign a judge has already read the briefs and is very actively thinking about the case,» said David Fine, an appellate lawyer based in Harrisburg, Pa. «She is very polite in questioning and at the same time also direct.»