Sentences with phrase «very same point»

The 2009 Nassau County executive race in the «fact sheet» says Siena showed incumbent Tom Suozzi leading challenger Ed Mangano «54 - 31 at the very same point in the Election as we are today.

@jonestown1 I heard ya when you made this very same point before.

Not exact matches

«At the same time, the efficiency and the point - to - point transportation just allows you to move things very fast, very quickly and in a smart way.»

At the same time, «anyone who doesn't have a pristine credit rating finds it very difficult at this point to qualify for a mortgage.»

As Paul Krugman points out Reifschneider, working with John Williams and using the same FRBUS model, concluded that the ZLB was only a very small issue less than a decade before the financial crisis led to an 8 year stretch of zero rates.

The balance point on both of them are very close to the same.

For 2018, however, we're getting a very iterative update, to the point where it feels like the same phone all over again.

At the very least, they might have noticed that Mr. Trump isn't showing the same level of concern for hurricane damage in their island as he did for earlier damage to Texas and Florida, both of which he had visited by this point.

The first is the very optimistic assumption that in the decade following each starting point, the price / peak earnings multiple will move to a level of 20 (the same level seen in 1929 and other major extremes).

At the same time, 2 - year notes were enticing with 58 basis points, which at the very least was more attractive than the 14 basis points you could have gotten in 2011.

1 — Many atheists, and agnostics, I have encountered know very little about the Bible and routinely utilize the same 10 — 20 verses to reiterate their point.

@Vic, And that's all very nice (and according to the rules that «God» supposedly made compeltely possible as this universe does not allow one thing to be two things or two things to occupy the same space, but that's not really teh point here), but you didn't answer my question.

It's to the point with some Christian posters here that any criticism of their actions and religious beliefs garners the immediate judgment that the person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible observation made by Jesus.

And when our discourse was brought to that point, that the very highest delight of the earthly senses... was, in respect of the sweetness of that life, not only not worthy of comparison, but not even of mention; we raising up ourselves with a more glowing affection towards the «Self - same,» did by degrees pass through all things bodily, even the very heaven whence sun and moon and stars shine upon the earth; yea, we were soaring higher yet, by inward musing, and discourse, and admiring of Thy works; and we came to our own minds, and went beyond them, that we might arrive at that region of never - failing plenty, where Thou feedest Israel for ever with the food of truth.

Point is, the people who claim that the date has been found and the people who claim that it can not be found are quoting from the very same Bible.

But for that matter, I do not quite accept the «atheism» of Marx or of the death - of - God theologians for the very same reason, namely, that their counter-arguments against traditional theism also take their point of departure from the dualistic framework.

The point of unity is to keep the Body functioning — not to make all the parts the same or to try and force everyone to agree, but to ensure that we don't allow the very differences that make us so beautiful and diverse and adaptive cripple us to the point of uselessness.

The same point is powerfully made by Kierkegaard in his Christian Discourses.4 The person who thinks himself a perennial loser needs the pastor's encouragement to be enabled to use those very circumstances of adversity for learning, spiritual growth, and discipline.

I once read a blog written by a philosopher making this point about proving a negative and using the very same example.

My point is that we know so very little about our universe that I can say «at the moment nothing we know of is eternal» while at the same time understanding that the universe could be like that electron and wink in and out of existence in some constant renewal, from singularity to singularity and back again, but because we only see a tiny fragment of the process we can only make sloppy assumptions as to the mechanics involved.

Supporters of religions are especially insidious in that they conveniently use as evidence the very same questionable holy books that are the point of the question.

I'm not sure I understood your last point, I operate under no such delusion, I will make no bones about the fact that if you choose to spend your life here without God, then you will do the very same in your eternity.

They will find it harder to overlook the fact that the man who denounces Freddie Mac to the point of suggesting that those in Congress who aided and abetted it be imprisoned, took $ 30,000 a month from that very same parasitic federal creation.

As a compromise, they switch channels back and forth during the commercials, and, if Mom and Dad give up, may very possibly stay with the new music - TV channel which entrances both Junior and Sis, who at this point may be doing part of their homework at the same time.

It's possible — and I may defend this at some point — that he was using the philosophical vocabulary at hand to explain some of the same phenomena that Mr. Morton is attempting to solve, albeit in very different ways and with very different presuppositions.

The reports in Matthew and Mark (variants of the same) differ in some points from Luke's, and John does not report the hearing.20 At best we are at a disadvantage in having no more than a very brief précis, in Greek, of proceedings conducted in Hebrew, which may have been quite lengthy.

Therefore two prehensions may have the same spatio - temporal standpoint but still differ if the subjects in question differ in the unity of their subjective immediacies.73 But though in this he sides with Cobb, Ford faults Cobb on the very point Wilcox raises.74 For while God, in Cobb's view, is omnispatial, he is not omnitemporal.

Yet this pure mode's very existence is denied often and, at the same time, its characteristics become «bad» from the culture's point of view.

The jews just worship the god these folks are the prophets of, althou some claim jesus is the son of that very same god and therefore better — if a son of a god can die so easily, whats the point i ask you!

He said 75 % of television shows are «not very good», but pointed out the same could be said of books.

Omnipresence tells us that the divine Love is everywhere and always present and at work to augment the good, often in very surprising places — a Christian would point especially to a humble human life, to a man born in a manger, and to that same man rejected and put to death, as the place where such active presentness is most clearly seen.

When speaking of something language also speaks of itself, pointing to its ground which is taken away from it, and by this very fact given: this is signified when we say «God» even though we do not mean by this the same as language as a whole, but the ground on which it rests.

But, as Popper points out, this reductionist passage was written in the very nick of time, for it was in the same year that Chadwick announced his discovery of the neutron and Anderson (1933) first discovered the positron.

It does not matter if we say Gott in German or Deus in Latin, or El in the Semitic languages or teotl in Mexican and so forth, though it is, of course, a very obscure and difficult question how we can know that all these different words mean the same thing or person, for in this case we can not simply point to a common experience of what is meant, independent of the term.

While none of Jesus Christ's 1st century Christian leaders ever involved themselves in politics to the point that they ran for public office, after they all died out those men Jesus said would sneak into the church did sneak in and did get involved with political leaders and in just a couple of centuries the Holy Roman Empire was the old Roman Empire whitewashed to appear to be something of God's and both the church and the State being led by the very same man, Pontifex Maximus who had his own wife killed for proving that his trinity doctrine was horsepucky.

I was pointing out to others the very same thing: Evolution is not the science of the origin of the universe.

(A point which I have attempted to argue in The Gospel of the Kingdom [1940]-RRB- Their interests are very largely centered upon the apostles, but at the same time the surviving tradition within them makes it clear that Jesus» influence upon the populace of Galilee resulted in «multitudes» following him about and hanging upon his words.

Yet at the same time, an unbridled, completely laissez - faire capitalist system can he as destructive to human life and to human value as any communist system might be, for unbridled capitalism will inevitably grind to that point where the capitalists are very few, owning all the means of production, and the masses are many, and they are being exploited.

The bigger point is that there are numerous scientists saying they agree evolutionary theory explains macroevolution but those very same people do not understand how.

As a christian apologist, Chad, has 2000 years of «facts and testimony» to draw on to defend the delusion, not to the degree of proof or evidence; only to the point that a whole lot of people bought into the scam, therefore the scam is true based on the bible, why, because a 2000 year old book, that very same bible says so, which completes the circle.

You are not getting your own point — the same things you are complaining about are the very reason you have the opportunity to complain.

As we point people to God, we are at the same time, very immediately, depending on him ourselves.

Among the various kinds I can mention only the pimmt - cafe, or «coffee - pepper,» larger but about the same shape as a grain of Liberian coffee, violet - red at one end; the piment - zoueseau, or bird - pepper, small and long and scarlet; — and the piment - capresse, very large, pointed at one end, and bag - shaped at the other.

Surprisingly, the baking time is rarely very different, but you should begin watching it at the halfway point, just the same.

Failure shouldn't necessarily be blamed on transfers.It's part of the reason but is not the only reasons.Other clubs which can't even buy like Arsenal have won very good trophies.Even at those times we were in debt we had a good team capable of winning the EPL or winng some of the smaller trophies.But we just went on trophyless.Now we are almost debt free and we are promised glory but honestly we don't even have the hope of glory.The only thing that can save us is renewal of the mind of the manager and board.That will bring a positive change.It's only insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.We have a lot to prove out there to the world because the greatness of Arsenal has really gone down in the face of the world.They only see us as a team with good football that's all.The world doubts us and we have a point to prove.The values of a club is as important as winning trophies.If not Arsenal wouldn't have been this top club that people talk about everyday were it fpr only values or trophies.They go hand in hand.However, to the world trophies are very important and that fact can not be hidden.

I don think all those responding this morning has woken up yet, man City put seven past burnley and unless we adopted the same tactics of two seasons ago by being very defensive and hit them on counterattack because it's important we get a result as we did against Chelsea when most pundits were fearing the worst and a point on Sunday will be wicked for it will do wonders for the players self confidence and send a message as well that arsenal can still do the business

So I think Henry is right, one of the big 3 is not going to drop the ball too much and we will drop the ball sooner rather than later, unless you consider dropping 5 points in the first 3 games the same as dropping the season, which it very well might be.

Fielding the top team we can is obviously a priority... But the same fans who seem to preach that, are the same ones who will relentlessly berate Wenger if an injury occurs or we pull up sluggish and drop points against a very organized, hard - working Everton..

My point here is that in as much as Chelsea are being hailed as having had a super season and their team rated as being miles ahead of other teams, their success was also down to having the same first 11 for very long periods in the season.

Arsenal having lost in the same round for the last 5 years, and having been handed a very tough tie, may want to prove a point.