Sentences with phrase «very same publishers»

Night Witches is by the very same publisher, and casts players as members of a real - life second world war Soviet bomber regiment made up of women flying outmoded planes.

Not exact matches

That means Metacritic scores — which can determine financial bonuses for executives at studios and publishers — are compiled by trade and industry press, all of whom often depend on those same companies for their very livelihood.

Very few publishers have the resources that allow them to do the same.

They are the same publishers who believe their customers, their readers, are criminals and so they load their e-books with DRM (yes, there are a few exceptions but a very few).

This is important to understand because the information that goes into a book proposal is the very same information that literary agents use to sell books to publishers; it's the same information that publishers use to promote books to bookstores, readers, and the media.

Self - published and «very small publishers»» titles in the same time period go from 19 percent of the market in 2012 to 42 percent of the market in 2015.

In May of 2011, this same author submitted the book to a small press publisher who was very eager to publish it.

A problem very clearly seen in the secular book market as well, when publishers keep releasing the same one - storyline - fits - all books to generate sales.

There is so much competition for readers» attention, let alone the media, and at the same time publishers» publicity departments are shrinking, so publishers have to be very mindful of those they choose to work with.

But for a big account like Amazon where they're ordering enormous quantities from big publishers... the shipment would probably go from the publisher's warehouse the same or next and arrive very quickly.

I'm an author and independent publisher, and I collaborate with the very same people employed by the large traditional publishers for editing and design.

It's very common for both self - pubbed authors & traditional publishers to use the same images for their covers (or images from the same batch).

Yet the chairman of that very same agency, Jonathan Lloyd, retains enough of the royal mentality he acquired working at HarperCollins during the Castle era to remain skeptical of publishers actually making their own choices.

By embracing and utilizing the very technology that is changing the book publishing world, traditional book publishers have the ability to offer authors the same services provided by self - publishing platforms under the umbrella of a vast amount of knowledge, experience, and a long - standing history of success.

These publishers are now very worried that Amazon will employ the same strong - arm tactics they did with publishers to get eBooks at rock bottom prices.

Major publishers always release the hardcover and e-book at the very same time.

First off, as soon as a reader read a very low number of pages, Oyster had to pay the publishers the cost of the full book — which, you'll note, is about the same price as Oyster's monthly fee.

This same idea was echoed again and again and again by each and every publisher at the meeting, and even the very providers of digital services: this is not a significant revenue generator as of yet, and certainly NOWHERE NEAR able to match, let alone surpass, the sales from physical print comics.

Well, suffice it to say that individuals and groups associated with the defendants are sounding off through the comment process, and they are making very strong claims to the general effect that DOJ's efforts to protect consumers against ebook price - fixing are misguided, because the DOJ should instead be protecting the interests and the distribution infrastructure of the same publishers who colluded with Apple to raise ebook prices by 30 to 100 percent back in 2010.

For her part, Authors Alliance co-founder Pamela Samuelson gave an interview to Publisher's Weekly that very clearly illustrates how the organization isn't even on the same radar as the Authors Guild, instead planning to advocate for authors who are interested in making their works available on a widespread, no cost basis.

Big Publishers have done the exact same thing to writers, the very suppliers of all of their product.

And the sales forces of most publishers took over the control of what was bought, only letting in clones of the very same thing that had sold before.

The point is this: whether you choose to query literary agents or to publish through Amazon, et.al., you and the big mainstream publishers share the very same goal: to sell lots of books to lots of strangers.

«And there is more,» she continues, moving on to descriptions of separate meetings that four of the Publisher Defendants had with Amazon «on the very same day in which they made identical demands on Amazon to switch to the agency model.»

Those same people tend to be very surprised to discover that publishers actually use just one space ─ not two ─ after periods.

Hopefully it's the beginning of a trend — so that authors don't let Publishers price - gouge the very same Kindle and Nook owners who made the author a hit to begin with.

Or loan it, unless it is one of a very few marked as loanable by the publisher and, if it is, you can't read it at the same time your friend is reading it.

Due to our 18 years of experience and the large number of publishers we have worked with, we can offer you stability at the same time as being very open to new channels and new formats.

These techniques I've shared with you are the very same ones used by the NY big six publishers and we indie authors would do well by observing and taking notes.

Rather, it's questioning why publishers who insist on using DRM to limit consumer rights are resisting using that same technology to give consumers a very limited simulation of the same rights they would have with a printed book.

Anne Womack crystalized this sentiment: «We would love for the Big 5 publishers to recognize libraries as partners, as a means to get their books into the hands of hundreds of readers who may very well purchase more of the same book / author in the future.»

But the term used for such a publisher is a «vanity press» in the same way there is such a thing as an independent publisher that might be very much dependent on grant money from the government.

Not surprisingly, around the same time that e-reader sales were taking off, we were seeing a real increase in Canadian e-book content ---- from small publishers to some large publishing houses ---- and not just in terms of new titles of bestsellers and genre fiction that are very popular with the format.

It's designed both for writers and for small publishers, very cool, and will feature Writer Unboxed icon Jane Friedman and Hugh Howey, both doing keynotes (not on the same podium at the same moment, I should assure you, although the scenario offers tantalizingly fun images, lol), and there even are to be some ravings from yours truly in various panel sessions and things — these are brave conference organizers.

At the February reveal, or immediately after it, Sony officials were asked about DRM and from the very start they said «It'll work the same way it works today», «It's up to the devs / publishers if they want to add it with things similar to the online pass».

Indeed, many people have openly defended the publisher's attitude while vehemently berating the very same tactics that have been talked about within GamersGate.

Edward Meneeley, an artist, photographer, and the publisher of Portable Gallery, recalled to me a very tense spring and summer in 1965, when he was shooting works for Ileana Sonnabend in the same warehouse where Castelli stashed Short Circuit.

On the very same day, in very different locations, the nation's two leading legal publishers are both staging day - long summit meetings, to which they have invited a variety of legal bloggers, journalists, industry analysts and «influencers.»

And as for how it is that the two leading legal publishers came to host parallel summits on the very same day, no doubt it is a matter of sheer coincidence.

Now, however, the internet has made everyone a publisher and has moreover, as someone once said to me, greased the skids of prolixity: people who wouldn't otherwise dream of buttonholing you to announce that the rain was falling will feel free to offer you online aperçus in the very same flow as their valuable thoughts.

Courts and tribunals will not hire lawyers or librarians in numbers to craft names so perfect that any other publishers in the country following the same rules would arrive at the very same result.

The suggestion is to include Maritime Law Book in your table (the same publisher who supplies the case comments to SLAW)-- they have excellent databases structured around a very good taxonomy, and including them would make the table much more useful.

Very good infographic from the same folks on native advertising that covers publishers and investors: http://news.solvemedia.com/post/37787487410/native-advertising-in-context-infographic