But the difference is that the credit score shown by various credit card companies is the actual FICO score —
the very same score your lenders will see.
Not exact matches
This negative feedback served as the catalyst for the clinic to completely overhaul their people strategy, resulting in increased
scores in the
same assessment — beginning the
very next year.
That means Metacritic
scores — which can determine financial bonuses for executives at studios and publishers — are compiled by trade and industry press, all of whom often depend on those
same companies for their
very livelihood.
In the remainder of my talk today I would like to set out in more detail how Australia stacks up against the above list, starting with the ten factors on which we receive a
very high
score, and following roughly the
same order as in the list above.
Both Ramsey and Cazorla can defend and
score as well and I am expecting a
very tight match for Ozil to control the ball and make the right pass... Ramesy for Cesc and Coq for Hazard (tight m2m)... I am sure Monreal will handle his back
very well and I hope the
same for Bellerin against Hazard... Giroud will find difficulties to hold up the ball against Cahill and Tery, he must be on his day... Welback to do them the
same of Utd game... Gabriel should start most of the remaining games, BFG should be benched next season
City aren't getting the
same headlines because they did nt
score off a last minute goal, and were so
very clearly better than United who only chances came through Bravo mistakes.
I cant imagine he will leave for the
same type of money that they bought him for as with ffp rules and his
scoring these days being
very good for a winger but not so much for main striker and also people will be looking at Falcaos case.
Having
scored 37 goals in all competitions last season, i just hope he can do the
same in his
very first season, especially if Ozil and Alexis are slipping through balls to him in every game.
So he got up and, in the
very same round,
scored a TKO of Jackson and won the title.
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have
scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should
very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the
same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens
very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)
I am not so sure, because the
very next time we played Bayern Arsenal lost by the exact
same score, suggesting that absolutely nothing was learned.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players,
very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the
same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of
scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't
score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I think i did nt see the
same match than monreal and mr wenger... we were extremly awefull in the first half, manu would
score 3 with shrek... then we draw the game with a deflected shot and the only other clear shot was one of giroud (i did nt blame him because his control from a bad ozils pass was
very good)... for me we werent even near to win the game and we were lucky to get a draw...
very much to improve, we get our 3 spot, but the fact that wenger did nt even recognise our bad game worrie me
He is not a quality striker because he makes a lot of mistakes in his game.The fact that he
scores 20 goals does not mean he is a quality back up striker.It is one thing to be a goal scorer and another thing to be a good or average player.Goal
scoring is a
very important aspect of a player but not the only aspect.Trust me you can
score 20 goals in all competitions and still be average.If Chamakh, Gervinho and all the so called flops
scored this
same goals they would still have been considered not good enough for Arsenal.His game is just not good enough and I for one believe even if no one believes that we can get a backup striker who is better than him and also a top centre forward.Its all about mentality and willingness.Forget his goals and look at his game or else you'll force me to bring up strikers in the world who have
scored his
same goals and are even considered terrible.
In essence the two teams play
very similar as Beneteke is the focal ST who knits together the play for Villa, having
scored a goal more and assisted 8 less in the
same time frame as Giroud it's easy to argue his teammates are more inferior yet his own ability
very much the level Giroud is at.
When Elneny joined he was full of confidence and that's how you assess a player when he's at his
very best otherwise a guy like Ozil will be considered trash taking by his last performances yet everyone goes back to his memory books to assess Ozil and the
same should happen with Elneny who won back to back player of the month when he first joined and
scored that screamer against Barcelona yet his all round contribution that made the headlines then came Xhaka on board and that is exactly when Elneny's form started slightly dipping because simply his confidence was shaken by finding himself a regular bench warmer instead of a regular like he was before Xhaka joining and I don't think Wenger addressed this psychological issue with Elneny or even noticed it probably because he had enough issues of his own.
Giroud
scored the opening goal in a vital Premier League win over Everton in the
very next game and then did the
same in the next game at QPR.
The 27 year - old has a reported price tag of # 50m and is said to have a salary bill of 10 million euros, (which as about the
same as Arsene Wenger earns at the current exchange rate), but he has
scored a
very respectable 101 goals in his last 149 games which is not a bad rate of return, and he should be worth every penny.
Didier Drogba is a club legend, and
scored a couple of goals in Diego Costa's absence last month, but he is a
very different player to Costa, and the team doesn't really function the
same way with him in the side.
Ospina made a couple of
very good saves before and after that and Arsenal really should have had at least one goal before halftime, but Ozil shot wide, Sanchez headed wide, Elneny took an extra touch when he should have shot and Iwobi did the
same, leaving us with three goals to
score without reply after the restart.
Let's go for Aubameyang or our
very own Higuin who
scores same league goals with Cristiano Ronaldo this season.
You comparing Wiltshere with Schneiderlin????? check the stats, goals
scored, pass completion, interceptions and you will be
very sad to see that they are not in the
same league.
The Uruguayan striker single handedly led Liverpool from the front this season,
scoring 31 goals in the Premier League as the Reds came
very close to securing their first league title in 24 years but according to Hodgson, he will find it difficult to display the
same kind of venom for Uruguay.
If I asked you which two Liverpool players you would rely on to produce a moment of magic, to
score a goal from
very little when the team needed it, chances are most Liverpool fans would say the
same two names.
Of Vardy's 24 goals, 15 came in the first half of the season, with Vardy only
scoring 9 times (with 3 penalties) in 2016 — that is, the
same number of non-penalty goals as Olivier Giroud, whose 2016 was
very,
very poor.
The team who make a mountain out of a molehill, the
same side which couldn't beat Blackpool in their
very last home fixture and the team which hasn't won in the league since the end of August, when Fernando Torres awoke from his slumber for the first and only time this season to
score the winner in a fortunate 1 - 0 success at Anfield.
If the
score stays the
same long into the second half, there's a
very real chance he might change this approach.
He just needs a chance the
same as Burke, he has an instinct for
scoring goals and not many have that, he will never be a great passer or header or tackler but
very few have that nack of being in the right place ie Lineker or Greaves don't laugh I know he is a long way from there standard but they had to start at the bottom to, if you watch him he never panics in front of goal he hits the target and forces the keeper to make saves, He needs to sharpen up his pace owner 2 yards and practice his shooting and practice his timing of runs to stop off sides.
Very little change on last week, with Labour recording exactly the
same score and only the Conservatives moving by more than half a point (and then just barely).
The
very good Public Whip website gave him a 90.4 %
score on
same sex marriage.
Other experiments have raised questions about the role of randomness and subjectivity in
scoring, showing that two groups of reviewers can give the
same proposals
very different
scores, leading to different funding outcomes.
But strength is
very hard to measure with a single test: some people
score very highly on one test of strength, but less highly on another similar test, even when it involves the
same muscle groups.
I was looking through comments on a recentish post, and some lucky reader
scored a major sale on this blazer — which I immediately recognized as the
very same blazer I had bought during my first pregnancy, probably a good five years ago at this point.
A second study, recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by Gary Chamberlain, using the
same data as Chetty and his colleagues, provides fodder both for skeptics and supporters of the use of value - added: while confirming Chetty's finding that the teachers who have impacts on contemporaneous measures of student learning also have impacts on earnings and college going, Chamberlain also found that test -
scores are a
very imperfect proxy for those impacts.
The
scores they assigned to the
same essay were
very similar, demonstrating that we were able to measure critical thinking about art with a high degree of inter-coder reliability.
You can not give the
very same feedback to all of your learners, without taking into account their
score, their strengths and weaknesses.
For the
very same reason, small schools are also overrepresented among those with extremely low test
scores.
A second study, recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by Gary Chamberlain, using the
same data as Chetty and his colleagues, provides fodder both for skeptics and supporters of the use of value - added: while confirming Chetty's finding that the teachers who have impacts on contemporaneous measures of student learning also have impacts on earnings and college going, Chamberlain also found that test
scores are a
very imperfect proxy for those impacts.
, recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by Gary Chamberlain, using the
same data as Chetty and his colleagues, provides fodder both for skeptics and supporters of the use of value - added: while confirming Chetty's finding that the teachers who have impacts on contemporaneous measures of student learning also have impacts on earnings and college going, Chamberlain also found that test
scores are a
very imperfect proxy for those impacts.
Despite the painfully bad educational outcomes in many public schools in ghettos across the country, there are also cases where charter schools in the
very same ghettos turn out students whose test
scores are not only far higher than those in other ghetto schools, but sometimes are comparable to the test
scores in schools in upscale suburban communities, where children come from intact families with highly educated parents.
The fact of the matter is is that all states have essentially the
same school level data (i.e.,
very similar test
scores by students over time, links to teachers, and series of typically dichotomous / binary variables meant to capture things like special education status, English language status, free - and - reduced lunch eligibility, etc.).
It's not
very often, if ever, that you see a car with the
same scores across the board.
I don't get why it didn't
score as high as iPad2 (or even higher) because it should: aside from the different OS, both tablets have
very comparable (if not the
same) features.
Also, if your credit improves since the moment when you obtained your mortgage loan, it is also wise to refinance because your improved credit
score will determine a lower interest rate if the market conditions are the
same or
very similar.
Back then, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac offered prime lending products to people with 620 credit
scores as well as folks with 800 credit
scores, and the people with
very high
scores paid about the
same for their loans as the borrowers with low
scores.
Yet credit
scores today certainly consider them and treat all collection accounts the
very same, driving down
scores.
«But, as we have discussed with industry stakeholders for months, borrowers with the
same credit
scores can pose
very different risks.
And if a homeowner does meet the Banks minimum required Fico
Score, why do they impose additional risk based pricing for the
very same homeowner effectively pushing the interest rate higher?
I have a
very good
score and after Self Lender posted it to my report, my
score went down 30 points (
same with my husband for 18 pts).
This is a
very important perk because these credit
scores are the
same ones used by lenders to approve or deny loans.