Sentences with phrase «very same skills»

To wade confidently into this ocean, you will need to apply the very same skills that you applied in establishing your own business!

By leveraging these skills, and capitalizing on the catalyst of emotional engagement (our stock on the shelf), we can bring about significant student achievement.The challenge for us in the arts education community is to demonstrate how teachers can employ those very same skills in their teaching, whatever the discipline.

I frequently use the very same skills it develops to service or mend things too, which is an age when sustainability is paramount seems wholly appropriate.

These are the skills our young people are developing, and according to Microsoft research presented at Bett 2011, these are the very same skills that employers are seeking from potential employees.

With decades of experience, Eric is likewise passionate about teaching other practitioners these very same skills he has acquired to help them improve their own patient outcomes.

Fittingly, I teach many noncollege - educated entrepreneurs the very same skills so they can grow fast without missing anything important.

Sometimes the very same skill has a few different terms that describe it.

Not exact matches

The key enterprising skills I used when first starting out are the very same ones I use today: the art of delegation, risk - taking, surrounding yourself with a great team and working on projects you really believe in.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

The same reasons BC condemns the readers and contributors to this forum — that we think, question, use our own God - given intelligence and reasoning skills, don't accept the easy answers, and are accepting of differences which create no harm — are the very things that make that notion quite bizarre.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

While their skill set is different they are very much the same player.

Walcott is very good physically, but his other skills are still not in the same level as Sanchez, Draxler, Reus, Moses, Valencia, Hazard, Pedro, etc..

Bryant doesn't have the same lengthy track record as Trout, but he has a very similar skill - set despite being most known for his power.

These same «kids» go out into the workplace lacking the very skills valued there — things like problem solving, creativity, resilience, and perseverance, not to mention good mental health.

It's infant mortality that the US suffers in, not perinatal / neonatal (eg; very shortly after birth)-- and surprise surprise, it's pretty much for the same reason we have a high maternal mortality — in the US, poor people can't / don't have access to skilled health care until it's an emergency, because then they can't refuse you.

They bring together their skills to make Bamboletta what it is now but the very heart of it remains the same as when I started.

As children naturally develop more logical and creative thinking skills through play, they can also stack and build their own rolling car with this very same play set.

They might just get away with it because it takes a very higly skilled hacker to both transmit and receive illicit messages on the same phone.

They all contain the exact same DNA bases in exactly the same order; however, liver or nerve cells look very different and have different skills.

In my mind, work experience equates to vacation and casual work, and even though these may be very valuable, they can not develop your skills or knowledge to the same extent as a career in research.

And some advice for leaders: be VERY courteous in how you ask for a dance, try to not take rejection personally, be patient with follows who may not be on the same skill level as you, & don't almost end her life with risky moves.

Things I didn't like: the graphics, since they feel very dated (same issue as with Deus EX: HR); lack of skill development (your powers» scaling feels bland and straight forward, a scheeme similar to Skyrim's skill trees would've been much better).

Sully's grayed hair and mustache are signifiers of his inherent abilities and wisdom gained from simply doing the same thing over and over and over and honing his skills for this very moment.

And in a way, that is what Carney was able to do — employing that skill of his to very efficiently, create that credible backdrop of the «boy band» and the musical journey — so that the real story about the female condition, could be rendered sharply against that same background.

The gargantuan success of Grand Theft Auto 5 is both an achievement standing testament to the skill of the developers at Rockstar Games, and very likely a looming oppressor that instills doubt in the same developers while they work away on Red Dead Redemption 2.

At the same time, the «realness» of Caesar is also a testament to Serkis» well - honed, and very specialized, acting skills, which — as in «Rise» — serve to ground Reeves» film in a sense of emotion.

Test Your Vocabulary Skills Verbs and Synonyms 1 A synonym is a word or phrase that has either the same or a very similar meaning to another word or phrase.

Eighty - nine percent of parents also think it is extremely or very important to assess critical thinking skills, and 88 percent say the same about communication skills.

Moreover, the very process of preparing to take them can be expected to cultivate in students many of the same noncognitive skills Heckman has shown to be so important later in life, all the more if states go beyond the requirements of No Child Left Behind and create incentives for individual students to do well.

At the same time, it teaches children a very valuable life skill: how to use a phone.

Yes it is just as likely for a child with very little skills in English to learn reading English from the supposedly average effective teacher, as it is for a child with skills in English to learn reading English, in the same classroom, from the supposedly average effective.

Computation skills are very important, but I don't teach them at the same time as problem solving.

Well, lesson planning uses those same skills, except the objective is the learning of your students in a very specific way and under very specific conditions.

You know what you are getting, with a minimum of skill in a graphics program you can tweak it to make it uniquely yours if you are worried about someone else having the same cover, and it's very inexpensive.

While it's true that consumers can do this very same work themselves, most are afraid or lacking the skills to communicate with credit bureaus and negotiate with creditors.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

After a successful 23 year career in an executive senior management position, honing her «people» skills with both colleagues and clients, Colleen made a decision to pursue a different career path — one that would enable her to combine her two passions in a very unique manner and help others at the same time.

Items crafting and Character skilling have become very boring, and I feel the same about open world games that rely on the usual narrative scheme: Main Quest and Side quests.

They all use the same skill tree and, at a certain point, they all start to play very similar as you unlock the same skills and upgrades.

The variation in skills is also very small — every character only has three or four active abilities which get stronger with higher ranks, which you unlock with skill points later in the tree, along with multi-target versions of those abilities which you gain in the same way.

Unfortunately, the puzzles themselves are all very similar, the solution is almost always the same, and really they are more tests of coordination and ambidextrous skills.

It was a huge mistake: - It's exactly the same game - It's full of bugs (character stuck, bugged quests,...)- It's super repetitive -90 % of skills are useless - Can't skip Orcs» speech (trust me after several hours you CA N'T stand it anymore)- Graphics are very meh - I'm ok with lore «twists» but here the story is super basic and poorly written - And the cherry on the cake: microtransactions, it's totally UNACCEPTABLE - Secondary characters are super cliche

Players are sorted into arenas, by their trophy counts (which correspond, very roughly, to skill levels) and only play against players from the same arena.

When a lawyer succeeds, the lawyer may become very impressed with his or her mental skills and perhaps feel a little superior to the so - called experts who have worked so long acquire the same knowledge the attorney acquired in a few hours.

«This firm has very competent and skilled lawyers who are, at the same time, reasonable to deal with,» said one in - house counsel.

While this may help us be more skilled and effective at practicing law, the very same mechanism can interfere with our ability to be effective leaders.

He has very specific lesson plans traveling over the same driving Lake County routes several thousand times, practicing skills that teenagers need, and not, as other schools, taking students on roads unfamiliar to the instructor.