Sentences with phrase «very same statement»

Maggie, it really isn't a big step; in fact, since no binding emissions targets are proposed, it is actually a step back from the original Kyoto protocol, opened for signature back in 1998, and which also contained the very same statement:

That it is curious for the spokesperson of the former President to be issuing a statement denying that he is attacking the Free SHS programme, whilst that very same statement seeks to disparage the programme.

Not exact matches

If Bachmann says she is going to bring her Faith to her governance and I was ok with Sotomayor very open statement saying she is brining her race and gender into her actions on the court... then why would I not be ok with Bachmann saying basically the same thing?

To rush biblical statements into this arena, as though they were of the same order as Charles Darwin's Origin of Species or Stephen Jay Gould's The Panda's Thumb, or as though scientific conclusions could be drawn from them, is to be very confused about what it is the Genesis materials are teaching.

Significantly, these same philosophical commitments have even been very much in evidence in statements of the WCC's past three assemblies.

During weekly lectures, preachers and ministers talk about the same brain - washing statements which is very annoying.

While claiming that the whole of creation has as its very structure the Sabbath principle, Barth qualifies this statement by suggesting that creation (through its culmination in the Sabbath rest) paints also to redemptive history (to covenant) and to the final consummation of the same.

But, then, there is something else that he very well could say that would render his apparently contradictory statements consistent — namely, that, although such terms as «absolute» and «relative,» or «necessary» and «contingent,» explicate the meaning of more than one logical type, and thus apply to entities within these different types in correspondingly different senses, rather than in simply the same sense, they nevertheless apply to the different entities within any single type whose meaning they in some sense explicate, not in different senses, but rather in the same sense.

By such a statement we do not mean, of course, that the same span of time follows as precedes that event — this is only very approximately true and will become increasingly less true as the centuries pass.

Indeed, according to Ewing's statement above, one could not even attend to a very complicated proposition, for such an act requires a period of time wherein the same self is present at the beginning and the end of the process.

But I am beginning to gather from statements in Muray's paper — such as that Hauerwas thinks «there is an unchanging core to the tradition» (86), which he means as a criticism — that Muray's anti-essentialism affirms that in fact there is nothing very definite to Christianity at all, meaning, I should think, that it is either everything or nothing — which in the end comes to the same thing.

I am convinced I've see this very same kind of statement elsewhere, it must be gathering popularity with the masses.

«My statement is that there is sufficiently similarity between Muslim and Christian conceptions of God, so that we can say that they worship the same and similarly understood God,» he told students, «which provides the basis for very significant common values.»

Avoid statements like: «We miss you very much;» or «It is not the same without you.»

These two candidates, one of whom could very well be the next mayor of Syracuse, represent more of the same for the city who can't move past cookie - cutter campaign personalities and rehearsed statements.

In the same statement, Miller proclaimed himself «very happy» and hailed «a victory for economic justice» that brings UC postdocs «closer to getting the economic security they deserve.»

Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.

Just prentending that they are of the same order of magnitude does not makes sense imho, and such statements are indeed very damaging to cAGW credibility...

For example, the moon and Mars have the same density, but their surfaces are very different, according to the NASA statement.

It's a very simplistic statement, but in essence he is saying the same thing.

It's a statement shade, but very wearable at the same time.

The same trend held true for the statement «When I have to work hard at my school work, it makes me feel like I'm not very smart,» to which English learners increased positive responses by 16 % between fall 2016 and spring 2017.

Very early in the curriculum students are asked whether statements of equivalence are true or false, basically «Are these two values the same or not?»

«In the same way as Schaeffler has contributed its technical expertise to Formula E from the very beginning, it also plays a pioneering role and is a partner for components and complete system solutions when it comes to applying electric mobility to volume production vehicles and putting them on the road,» said Peter Gutzmer, chief technical officer of Schaeffler, in a statement.

Even you have gone on to do the very same thing with the following statement:

Thesis statement is that one to build up a successful essay that is why while creating your analysis term paper thesis you should be very careful and creative at one and the same time.

Actually... the truth is very close to such statement because, common training and training done for highly specialized purposes are not the same.

It comes with both a 50,000 - mile bonus after a very low spend (just $ 1,000 over three months) and the opportunity for a separate $ 50 statement credit after any Delta purchase in the same time period.

The bonus can go as high as 50,000 SkyMiles for the same $ 1,000 minimum spend, with a $ 50 statement credit on Delta purchases in the same time period, but it has not yet gone higher and these offers are typically very short - lived.

Because it sounds like what you're trying to say is that the limiting of titles is not exclusive to just Microsoft but at the same time you're also not wanting to talk about Microsoft but your own statement very much is bringing up the comparison in saying that it is not just Microsoft.

At the same time, it's not quite great presentation and very simple structure also serves as a singular statement of everything that was wrong with the design and launch of the SuperGrafx system.

Saying they haven't listened to us and that they're making all the same mistakes is a god damned lie, and even you know it, because you contradicted that very statement a few sentences later.

caused those moving inside the space to experience the very building differently, to observe a little piece of the world more acutely, at the same time taking in massive statements of collective organization.

Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.

The same HadCRUT3 record shows that from 1998 through 2011 there was indeed a very slight (but statistically insignificant) cooling trend, so Rose's statement was technically correct.

Not that «Climate Change» deteriorates Health and Welfare of the American People, but that it is flatly contradicted by statements above, found in the very same report.

In view of your statement «As I will show later on virtually all climate variability is a result of internal system variability» I'm puzzled by your resistance to accepting the very same things, when I say it.

The IPCC 2001 TAR shows a graph of four datasets including Hadley CRU all showing the cooling from 1942 to 1975 but the 2007 4AR report shows the same Hadley CRU dataset modified (physically altered) to eliminate this cooling to show overall warming since the middle of the century allowing the statement «Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.»

The «butterflies looked indistinguishable, were flying together at the same place on the same day, but their DNA molecules were very different from each other,» Grishin said in a statement.

Of course, by your statement about the public's «intuitive» understanding of scientists, you should be prepared to accept the same opinion of engineers — because large numbers of «the public» have a very fuzzy ability to see any difference.

Recently, the management of that same firm made a very public statement — almost a declaration of intent — that legal AI tech and the automation of parts of its billable work was going to be central to their strategic future and was pivotal to their relationships with clients going forward.

In the same way write a very strong and concise statement for the objective.

Make this problem solving statement very specific (stay away from broad terms like «strategy», «leadership» and «people skills») to differentiate yourself from the thousands of others applying for the same position (See: http://www.recareered.com/blog/2009/12/17/3-things-your-next-employer-will-search-for-on-your-resume/).

I think adding in the same kind of energy and animation that he shows in his ending statement into the rest of the video would be very helpful.

The very next statement shows a major accomplishment doing the same type of job the person is applying for.

It's the same one you've got making a very impressive statement in your bedroom.