This means, if you hold a contract to sell stocks, you purchase a contract to buy
the very same stocks.
Now everyone is happily jumping back into
the very same stocks, although they are two or three times more expensive.
This situation occurs when an investor buys on margin, which mean the investor does not have the money to buy the stocks and so he or she will borrow the money and offer
these very same stocks that he or she is about to buy as collateral for the loan.
Not exact matches
The rest of affluent investors diverge in near - equal percentages: those who think the
stock market will be flat in 2015 (16 percent) represent roughly the
same portion of this demographic as those who are
very bullish (17 percent), expecting the market to be up 10 percent to 15 percent in 2015.
Phantom -
stock plans (or
stock - appreciation rights, which are
very similar) can yield the
same payoff option plans do.
This number can and will change depending on the environment but in most cases
stocks and bonds don't move together or with the
same magnitude
very often.
In fact, even a several - year span can be misleading, as a manager may be able to achieve above - average results by owning
very high - risk
stocks in a generally rising market but be virtually wiped out in the
same class of
stocks in a bear market.
The fact is,
stock funds often contain the
same, or
very similar, investments.
However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something
very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded
stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that
same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.
That said, it appears that many view ATRO the
same as we do as the
stock has performed
very well (up about 24 % YTD) and is currently not trading at its usual discount to the group.
«Recognise that this is a
very competitive business, and that when you decide to buy or sell a
stock, you are competing with people who have devoted a good portion of their lives to this
same endeavour.
Just dropping in to share the kind of recipe you, too, might make if you found yourself on a Thursday with a reasonably well
stocked pantry, a lot of kale (or other greens you picked up at the farmers» market back on Saturday), and two sweet Italian sausages that you bought from the
very same farmers» market for way too many dollars and which are threatening to go bad if you don't find a way to integrate them into this week's meal plan, a meal plan that has already incorporated more meat than you really like to eat.
Very good recipe, I use abuot 2 table spoons of flour before I put in the puree and only use 300 ml of
stock instead of 500 ml tastes the
same but reduces the cooking time.
And, true to Murphy's Law for Traditional Cooks, the
very same day you are out of homemade
stock, the family will clamor for soup for dinner.
They have been going in and out of
stock, so I am also sharing a
very similar pair by the
same shoe guy.
Cardigan (C&A de — out of
stock)-- Similar & Cheap Beanie (Primark)-- Similar Pants (H&M
very old)-- Similar & even more comfy than my pair T - shirt — the
same from Esprit.de Flats (JustFab.de)-- the ones I'd love to get
hot and sexy
very soft hearted love company LOVE TO DRESS IN
STOCKINGS AND G STRINGS I AM CLEAN SHAVING LOOKING FOR THE
SAME
By leveraging these skills, and capitalizing on the catalyst of emotional engagement (our
stock on the shelf), we can bring about significant student achievement.The challenge for us in the arts education community is to demonstrate how teachers can employ those
very same skills in their teaching, whatever the discipline.
On paper, they're
very close (as you can see in our comparison here)- the
stock Shelby GT350 should do 4.4 seconds from 0 - 62, while the Giulia QV needs only 3.9 seconds for the
same feat.
Using
stock art presents another potential problem in that a great many other people may be using the
very same image on the covers of their books.
It's
very sleek as it keeps the
same stock icons that the Curve 8900 comes with.
For anyone wondering about Kindle delays i.e. Bezos: «We hope to be able to announce to you within the next few weeks that we're back in
stock and that when you order a Kindle, we'll ship it to you that
very same day.
Becuase the touch parts no # updates
very fast, we only promised to send 100 % compatible new touch to you.100 % works for your tablet pc.meanwhile the
same no # shows on title out of
stock.
And, in fact, if you go to a lower initial withdrawal rate, say, 3.5 % or 3 %, you see much the
same effect — that is,
very high
stock allocations don't boost the probability that your savings will last and may even slightly reduce the odds (although, of course, the chances of one's nest egg lasting at least 30 years are higher all around at lower withdrawal rates).
I started out doing the
same thing, buying cheap
stocks with higher turnover and did
very well and enjoyed it.
Very few investors have the discipline to buy and hold
stocks to the
same degree they do so with index ETFs or mutual funds either.
Same goes for a lot of other
stocks that have been bid up
very high after the Heinz deal set off some dominoes a while back.
As you can see, this is
very similar to the Classic since the
stocks vs. bonds allocation are the
same.
But what will happen with these
very same people when
stocks start to shoot up on the next bubble?
I'm
very patient with
stocks that continue to hold the
same characteristics as they did when I bought them.
With regard to my
stocks in euro, the devalutaion against the Swiss franc was
very negative, causing the
same effect as if there was a dividend cut of 25 % regarding all my European holdings.
However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something
very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded
stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that
same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.
That brings us to the next potential risk — the risk that the largest companies in the S&P 500 Index also tend to be overvalued when compared with their 10 - year average price / earnings (P / E) ratio.2 According to our research taking these valuation measures into account, 70 % of the 10 largest
stocks in the S&P 500 Index were overvalued, as of December 31, 2015 and 56 % of the top 25
stocks are overvalued, the
very same ones that make up a third of the index allocation.
The other way to calculate a
stock dividend yield is by using the
very same formula (Dividend payout /
stock price) but using the current dividend payout divided by the
stock cost of purchase value.
Two investors can buy the exact
same stock and have two
very different outcomes.
On the flip side, good returns enjoyed by the pension fund do not accrue to you — if the
stock market does
very well, you do not reap the benefits, and your pension remains the
same.
It's no great surprise that the 2017 results for four of the five S&P 500 funds turned out to be exactly the
same: Not only do the funds have
very similar expenses, but also they're replicating an index fund that contains just 500
stocks.
If only there was a way to get the best of both worlds today... to purchase both a high - quality dividend growth
stock today AND collect a double - digit annual income stream from those
very same shares over the next 12 months.
0:34 «You buy another
stock or mutual fund that's
very much the
same, so you're still in the market; when the market recovers, you receive the recovery»
To turn around and buy the
same stocks you have been publicly avoiding requires overcoming some
very strong emotional biases.
From the Conclusions: «When valuations are
very high, as they are today, the
stocks have a substantial downside risk and they are likely to do about the
same as a 100 % TIPS portfolio.»
This usually happens when someone invests in the
same or
very similar
stocks in different accounts.
Just as bank executives continue to make the
same mistakes time and again lured by the fad of the day and the promises of high hanging (and yet
very risky) fruit — investors also continue to believe the promises that growth
stocks make, overbidding them, and giving rise to the value premium.
What we obviously have is
very high risk aversion, but why hasn't that
same risk aversion hit
stocks?
Notice that ETFs with
same objective (such as targeting value or low - volatility
stocks) often use
very different strategies.
I mean, if we are trying to time the market based on the Shiller PE, wouldn't it make sense to have the
stocks selected on that
very same criteria in the first place?
And that kind of diversification's dependent upon & unique to your current portfolio, so one can obviously expect two investors looking at the
same stocks (& with a similar approach to
stock valuation) will probably arrive at a
very different end - result in their
stock selection.
To know other investors, inc. the big boys, are all buying the
same stocks is
very reassuring.
Another point of view on the
same thing is: you should strive to have such a
stock portfolio that given that you know pretty much all there is to know about any given company in your portfolio, you can still sleep
very soundly no matter what the market does.
It works
very much the
same way when investing in the
stock market.