Sentences with phrase «very slight cooling»

«There has been a very slight cooling, but not anything really significant,» Willis has stated.

In fact, «there has been a very slight cooling,» according to a U.S. National Public Radio (NPR) interview with Josh Willis at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a scientist who keeps close watch on the Argo findings.

These factors contributed to very slight cooling of global temperatures over the past 32 years, with the execption of UAH, for which they have had no net impact on the trend.

That's what the record shows, BBD (two records, GISS and UAH show very slight warming, two records, HadCRUT and RSS show very slight cooling = in summary, «it has stopped warming»)

(Antarctic temperature has remained pretty much the same, with probably a very slight cooling)

This leads to a very slight cooling of the surface relative to the satellite record adjusted to surface variation levels.

We now have a very slight cooling trend since January 1998 of -0.006 °C per decade.

Natural temperature influences have had a very slight cooling effect, and natural internal variability appears to have had a fairly significant cooling effect over the past decade, but little temperature influence over longer timeframes.

According to forcing from these various orbital cycles and oscillations the climate should be stable with a very slight cooling and the next ice age would have been in 30 - 50K years.

This would have shown that the 1940s was the warmest period of the 20th century, and that there had been very slight cooling post the 1940s.

«There has been a very slight cooling, but not anything really significant,» Willis says.

They found that from 1979 to 2010, solar activity had a very slight cooling effect of between -0.014 and -0.023 °C per decade, depending on the data set (Table 1, Figure 2).

Not exact matches

The team identified a cooling trend in the Pacific Ocean and a very slight warming trend in the Atlantic Ocean since the late 1990s.

According to the op - ed author's calculations, more trees lead to more particles and more ozone, and the combination ** generally ** makes things warmer because warming from the heat - trapping ozone is bigger than the slight (and very uncertain) cooling from the particles.

A slight tingling or itching sensation and a little flushing is very common, and it's important not to leave it on for too long before removing with cool water.

The slight warmth of this lipstick, when offset by a cool skin tone, will actually make it stand out in a very flattering way — something that isn't always true for lighter skin tones.

I've often said to Tony that while I love and appreciate the vastness of Canada (so much of which I have not seen yet in the slightest), sometimes it would be really cool to have more countries around us to visit (without the need for epic amounts of, usually very pricey, travel).

One thing I forgot to mention in the video: turning the pages on the PRS - 350 is effortless and very cool — a slight flick of the finger accomplishes the page turn, because of the excellent new touch screen.

In general, the regions of expanding warming upwelling water in the Indian Ocean, North Pacific, or wherever they are, must create slight bulges in the surface, and the regions of shrinking, cooling, sinking water in the Arctic must create slight depressions in the sea surface (again, I mean in a very low pass sense — obviously storms, tides, etc, create all kinds of short - terms signals obscuring this).

In particular, the characters visit Punta Arenas (at the tip of South America), where (very pleasingly to my host institution) they have the GISTEMP station record posted on the wall which shows a long - term cooling trend (although slight warming since the 1970's).

My suspicion is that there is a bias in interpretation of XBT data to maintain the idea that the warming of the upper ocean since 1976 is due to increased co2, and the rescaling of XBT data works to reduce the impact of the ARGO data, which shows a «slight cooling» according to Craig Loehle and Josh WIllis (before his arm was twisted), and only a very slight increase according to Levitus 2010.

From 1940 to 1970, there was very slight global cooling.

AGW is a hypothesis that makes sense, namely: — GHGs absorb outgoing radiation, thereby contributing to warming (GH theory)-- CO2 is a GHG (as is water vapor plus some minor GHGs)-- CO2 concentrations have risen (mostly since measurements started in Mauna Loa in 1959)-- global temperature has risen since 1850 (in ~ 30 - year warming cycles with ~ 30 - year cycles of slight cooling in between)-- humans emit CO2 and other GHGs — ergo, human GHG emissions have very likely been a major contributor to higher GHG concentrations, very likely contributing to the observed warming

The same HadCRUT3 record shows that from 1998 through 2011 there was indeed a very slight (but statistically insignificant) cooling trend, so Rose's statement was technically correct.

Furthermore, it does not cause net ongoing cooling to offset the greenhouse warming because once the atmosphere has made that very slight adjustment it ceases to expand.

Aerosols from volcanic eruptions do have a cooling effect once they reach the stratosphere but the effect of high wind speed in the upper atmosphere would rapidly disperse these, and any local effects would be very slight.

The most recent «lack of warming» despite CO2 levels reaching record heights appears to me to very likely be the start of a new multi-decadal cycle of slight cooling, as Girma has also suggested.

You are both «assuming» that whatever is causing the current slight cooling is a «short - term phenomenon» and is, therefore, not comparable with past long - term solar forcing, which has been estimated by IPCC to be very low.