As evidenced, teachers in the lowest 20 % on the VAM score have differences in the mean observational score depending on the VAM score (a moderate correlation of r = 0.50), but for the other 80 %, knowing the VAM score is not informative as there is
a very small correlation for the second quintile and no correlation for the upper 60 %.
Not exact matches
And across all scales, from
very small controlled studies of marine plots to those of entire ocean basins, maintaining biodiversity — the number of extant species across all forms of marine life — appeared key to preserving fisheries, water filtering and other so - called ecosystem services, though the
correlation is not entirely clear.
Because of the
small electron number in LiH, all electrons contribute to this effect, making the electron distribution
very sensitive to
correlation effects.
«Our explicit calculations show that though the
correlations start off
very small, they grow in time and become large enough to change the outcome.»
The
very few studies in which researchers have examined this found «
small but positive
correlations» between SLOs and VAM - based ratings (i.e., not a strong indicator of validity).
You can diversify further by adding a
small allocation to gold, which has a
very low
correlation with both stocks and bonds.
Recent history is pretty clear that there is a
very large positive
correlation between the price movements of large, mid, and
small cap stocks.
(2) Natural factors (volcanoes, solar cycle) influencing the trend are
very small in comparison to anthropogenic CO2 (as e.g. standard
correlation analyses show, see for example Lean and Rind 2008, Foster and Rahmstorf 2011).
Concluding that seasonal
correlations must relate to ocean outgassing is not however a sensible conclusion (indeed, this is a
very small component).
compared to the total area, suggest that the overlap / masking effect by the higher cloud must be
very small for a high
correlation to shine through the upper clouds.
Large changes in cosmic rays are documented in response to magnetic - field variations (the Laschamp event of about 40,000 years ago is especially prominent) with no corresponding change in climate, so any cosmic - ray influence on the climate must be
very small (a weak
correlation can be obscured by noise; a strong control is almost always visible «by eye,» and clearly is absent).
Do these
very small changes alter the temperature of the earth?Some claim that the Sun alters wind patterns such as the jet stream if it does then it is obvious that it will have some
correlation with the length of day.How do you fit solar cycles so precisely to the length of day?
The southern Pacific is kind of boring to watch, but it seems to have a better
correlation to solar,
very small of course, but a big ocean with a
small change can do big things.
Now if you aren't happy with the Oppo use consider that ENSO is a
very small area of the equatorial Pacific known to have a high
correlation with «global» weather.
Although some studies found
small but significant positive
correlations between GCR and high - and mid-altitude clouds (Laken et al., 2010; Rohs et al., 2010), these variations were
very weak, and the results were highly sensitive to how the Forbush events were selected and composited (Laken et al., 2009).
Over 100 years or more I am skeptical that there would not be extremely high
correlation between a
very small scattered number of the most «pristine» locations and global temperatures.
The same hurricane damage database that is too
small a sample to show a
correlation with the Atlantic basin, annual total PDI is perfectly able to show a
very strong statistical relationship with another climate index, the annual ASO Nino 3.4 temperature anomaly index.
In reality, the
correlation between global mean temperature and carbon dioxide over the 20th century forms an important, but
very small part of the evidence for a human role in climate change.
Inversely,
correlations between scores on the BITSEA Competence scale and CBCL subscales were all
very small, close to nil, and mostly negative.
REITs are generally quite different from the
small - cap value segment of the non-REIT stock market: the long - term average performance of the two categories is
very similar, but REITs have usually been less volatile and the
correlation between them has typically been only about 70 percent.