Sentences with phrase «very start of this talk»

Said another way, the choice - differentiation - decentralization approach (and the animus it engenders) seems to be education's chapter in the story I mentioned at the very start of this talk.

Not exact matches

EASTWOOD: So I go in and it turns out he's in charge of production there so they cast... The next day after that the very next day I went, I was testing at a studio, standing and they gave me a page of dialogue, an absolute page, no other actor there and I had to run in and start talking to the camera.
You start to talk to them, and it's not just $ 2 billion of something, it is $ 2 billion in that specific segment of that market, with that kind of approach and investment style and very specific expertise.
This is the next great challenge for Beijing, and when the regulators finally do start to repair overextended balance sheet, with a much higher debt - to - GDP ratio than any other country at China's stage of economic development, according to a presentation Monday night by my very smart former student, Chen Long, I expect annual GDP growth rates will continue dropping steadily, by 1 - 2 percentage points a year through the rest of this decade (and there has been increasing talk in the past month or two that GDP growth rates are already 1 - 2 points below the printed rates).
In the remainder of my talk today I would like to set out in more detail how Australia stacks up against the above list, starting with the ten factors on which we receive a very high score, and following roughly the same order as in the list above.
My daughter says sometimes someone who doesn't know him will start explaining to him how to play football or baseball (both of which he's quite good at) and he just nods and is very attentive, as if he thinks the other person knows what he's talking about.
«So rather than starting the debate himself, actually it's grassroots... because of the very specific situation in Brazil, have requested the Pope, and the Pope is a pope of dialogue and is saying, «yeah, let's talk about this».
The Reagan Presidency as it is talked about now, is a fantasy, (unless you were very well off at the start of his term).
In fact it contradicts itself starting in THE VERY FIRST TWO CHAPTERS of Genesis when the order of creation is mixed up to having only 2 of the 4 Gospel writers bothering to talk about the birth of Jesus (and those two accounts conflict with each other while also providing timelines which make it IMPOSSIBLE for Jesus to have been born based on their accounts) to 3 of the 4 Gospel writers not agreeing on what the final words of Jesus were.
its a story that has been with us since we started talking and asking questions... however, the time has come since we can now answer many of the very same questions that required a god in the past with science, a bigger question arises... are people truly this willing and wanting to replace reality proven by testible science with a fantasy?
The company also has done a great job of telling a human story with a very visible founder appearing frequently in the media to talk about starting his company from nothing.
There was talk of him being involved in first team before the start of the season but has been injured only just comeing back but very good.
I'm pointing out that all this «sample size» and «it's early» and «stop being negative» talk is ignoring very real problems with this team because people don't want to believe that maybe, just maybe, the expectations were too high at the start of the season.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Bas Dost, not really talked about, but he struck 16 times in 17 starts from just 43 shots in the Bundesliga last year, he is very tall, very good in the air and showed ruthlessness in front of goal last year.
It has been a very disappointing start to the season and I don't even want to talk about the transfer window as we have had loads of articles on them already.
There has been a lot of talk about whether Arsenal should start playing Jack Wilshere in the deep lying holding midfield role that he has started to occupy and do very well at for England.
1996/7 was his first (part season) where he formally took over at (If I can recall correctly) around mid-late October.We had actually started the season fairly well with Pat Rice holding the reins until Wengers contract was up in Japan.And that was following a particularly bad run of pre season results I remember.Anyway you will recall we qualified for the UEFA CUP with a late Bergkamp screamer (oh how I worshipped that player) against Bolton.Were we pleased with this?Absolutely we were.You could see the progression in the team and with talk of more top players arriving we were all very encouraged and dare I say it?
I know mertesacker has been very poor and is not probably not the right person to be talking about our form but what he said is right, it's like our players are starting to see some of the flaws in the way we play, our tactics and our formations.
Given the two clubs involved in the transfer talk, it will undoubtedly be a very difficult decision for the 22 - year - old to make if he has intentions of leaving Germany to start a fresh challenge as playing for Guardiola or Barca is a dream for many.
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
If anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» club
And for all the talk of best rotation, the starting pitching has been very shaky.
The team has improved from last season, for sure, mainly in defense, BUT when people don't give us a chance we do very well its when people talk us up and the pressure rises we begin to flop, lets see where we are by round 10 then maybe i'll start to hope, BUT for now I've seen too much of Arsenal to get carried away.
It is certainly far too early in the season to realistically talk about any side as potential champions but there is no doubt that a win like this in a match that started so badly is exactly the type of result that can see you challenge at the very top of the table.
David Villa whose future at the club is very much the talking point of the season got a rare start.
Bob Wilson, former Arsenal goalkeeper and The 100 Club committee member said: «The Club was very receptive when Pat Rice, Frank McLintock and I started to talk through how such a large group of ex-players could still feel engaged and part of The Arsenal in its present day existence, and we are beyond delighted to be here today at the launch of this very special club.
Dispelling myths about cloth diapering - part 3 Myth # 3 «Starting your cloth diaper stash is very expensive» In talking to other moms and dads about the possibility of cloth... Continue Reading →
So I think that was the moment for me that really sunk in like this is really my baby and so we just snuggled skin to skin for a little while and it wasn't very long before she started showing signs of being interested in eating and we had also talked to the birth mom and talked about a plan for... our plan to breastfeed.
in my religion it says you should nurse a chld till 2 years of age but i weaned mine at such young ages started pureed food at 4 months and 5 months normal food squashed a little and are both very healthy my advice is to do what you think is best for your child as every childis diffrent and you know thee needs better than any one i would calmly talk to my husband and explain the matter and that every one should back off in a way that will not cause a problem with the relitionship
This is one of the very first things that my nurse practitioner warned me about when I started talking about giving my twins solid foods when they turned five months old and began looking at our dinner like it belonged on their plates.
But as I've talked about quite a bit on The Lunch Tray (starting with my very first post), it does concern me that our menu is currently still weighted almost entirely in favor of «kid food» (or what one source in Janet Poppendieck's Free For All calls «carnival fare»).
Every mom would want from the very deep of her heart to understand how her baby feels before it starts talking.
She is very excited and friendly and starts getting caught up on how birth's been going by asking lots of questions to the Mom and then starts excitedly talking about how great baby's looking.
I would start talking in a very casual matter of fact manner as if I'm having a chat with her.
But as I've talked about quite a bit on The Lunch Tray (starting with my very first post), it does concern me that our menu is currently still weighted almost entirely in favor of -LSB-...]
At one point my moms group's weekly discussion was so dominated by sleep that we were starting to get sick of each other, even though we needed each other so very badly, because no one else would be willing to listen to us talk with such hysteria about our child's sleep habits.
«I feel very bad on their agitation for a sovereign state of Biafra, Igbo suffered during the war, younger men who never knew what war looks like, are the people who have started talking about war by agitation for sovereign state of Biafra,» he said.
Democrats described the overall mood on budget talks as «very different» from the start of this session.
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: «From the very start ministers have quite obviously tried to suffocate the pensions talks, to bully and mislead, and to impose their will on millions of civil servants, teachers, council staff and health workers.
«Now people removed all that I said about the poor management of the economy and then made it look like I started by talking about the resource locations of this thing and put it forward and changed certain things to make me look like I was being a tribalist and it was bad, this is where I find people very mischievous;... You take the whole thing out of context and make it look very tribalistic, so, I think, yes, it happened, newspapers reported something wrong and I think people should be ashamed of themselves when they do this kind of «cut and paste» to create that wrong impression in the system...» Mr Osafo Marfo clarified.
I don't think there should be any subjects that, I know, religion tends to be kind of the elephant in the room very often, and when you start debating those kinds of things, but I'm always up for a conversation; which I think is the most important thing to remember, when you're having a discussion — with gigantic ironic quotes around it, a «conversation with someone» — is to make it a conversation, not falling into the trap of thinking the person you're talking to is an idiot, because they might believe something idiotic.
Steve: Through the end of the book you start to talk about, and it's a very dicey proposition, but an actual diagnosis of either autism or Asperger's syndrome for Dirac, and [why don't you] talk about what you think about that.
Now that has changed completely the nature of, if that's really true, it means the future of science is very different, because if there are many universes and in each universe the laws of physics are different, then may be we have to throw out fundamental ideas and the ability to make fundamental predictions in nature [and] have to start talking about probability.
«We can't start talking about improved treatments for Maya because diabetes is a very complex disease, involving lots of yet unknown risk factors, says Teresa Tusié Luna, a human geneticist who studies diabetes at the Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition in Mexico City.
This stuff is really interesting, I mean, it is really going to, I believe, is going to change the world dramatically; but I think also it's going to help us to understand that question I started out the whole talk with, which is what does it mean to be alive?We are making forms of life that are very different from anything that ever existed before.
I tried talking to my doctor bout it an they don't listen to me or want to help an I am starting to get very depress bout it an I have depression so thats not good as o if anyone can help me I will appreciate it very much oh don't say to do a diet and exercise cause like I said before I can't exercise cause of my hips an diets don't work for me
When that happens, hormones as well as a number of other singling molecules like neurotransmitters which you began this talk with are released and they have very definitive brain care taking effects, but due to endocrine disrupting compounds that we're exposed to on a daily basis that are hormone disrupting and even sociologic ways that we now live differently with texting being the new talking so there's less one on one connection, there's a lot more anger, there's many people starting to write books on this, our human connection is, and I love your book very much, our human connection is waning.
One woman we talked to is a store manager and had a 6 month old boy — she said she needed to look more professional and put together, but had no idea where or how to start, especially because of having very little time.
We are incredibly close and honest with each other and talk constantly, we're a very chatty, conversational couple who shares everything and so his passing of comment on this outfit wasn't him being horrible it was just banter that had us both rolling around the floor laughing... just thought i'd better clear that up before you all started thinking he was an ogre haha!)
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z