Not exact matches
Whitehead's own personal answer to this challenge is to postulate the existence of a
very special entity, a nontemporal actual entity, which he
calls God and which he provides with a number of
very special cosmological roles, such as prehending every other actual entity and being the source of
subjective aim for every other actual entity.
When you give everything a
subjective aim, and make this apply right down the scale, you are using language which is
very difficult to make intelligible, except in the case of what Whitehead
calls «high grade organisms.»
In turn, this reflects the fact that the
subjective aims of such entities are confined ordinarily
very closely to what Whitehead
calls «physical purposes» (PR 280, 406 ff.)
Since on this issue, racists oppose both «the left» and what we had previously
called «the right» it's
very subjective as to who they are closer to on other issues.
Ultimately, however, such an approach will be
subjective when it comes to distinguishing between birds with
very similar sounding
calls and songs.
All this means is that, as Annan Points out in his climatic change paper, the choice of prior isn't an easy
call and is
very subjective.
Of course, this is a
very subjective matter, and this is why we are
calling upon you to see how Android Authority fans feel about this.
Well, I wouldn't
call them «laws of science» because love and science don't go quite well together, as love is
very subjective, while science strives to be objective.