Sentences with phrase «very substantial contribution»

As with other consortia involved in the SKA, SKADS is building demonstrators in order to get a new type of instrument functional and to demonstrate the required cost factor will be very substantial contribution to radio science.

Going back 2500 years is «a very substantial contribution,» says Mann.

It leaves out the very substantial contribution that 2 - 2.5 % annual growth would make to cutting the deficit, and indeed imposes spending cuts of such a magnitude as would significantly ratchet down growth potential and risk a double - dip recession.

«The second largest use of the proceeds will be a very substantial contribution to the Hawk Family Foundation.

Not exact matches

«That being said, Mr. Trump has paid hundreds of millions of dollars in property taxes, sales and excise taxes, real estate taxes, city taxes, state taxes, employee taxes and federal taxes, along with very substantial charitable contributions.»»

As faithful readers of this blog will know, I make only very sporadic contributions to this blog but a substantial fraction of those contributions have made reference to modern monetary theory (MMT), the view (crudely put) that, based on a detailed understanding of the institutional mechanisms behind monetary operations, calls into question our obsession with -LSB-...]

«In short, under his leadership US IRF policy can advance human rights and, at the same time, make substantial contributions to the national security of the United States at very low cost.»

But his contributions were substantial, and the story has a very happy ending (see below!).

«This planned acquisition adds a unique asset class to our very substantial fixed income business and gives us the opportunity to manage assets in the defined contribution market.

• It is very likely that anthropogenic forcings have made a substantial contribution to increases in global upper ocean heat content (0 — 700 m) observed since the 1970s (see Figure SPM.6).

It is likely that there has been an anthropogenic contribution to the very substantial Arctic warming since the mid-20th century.

That leads to the IPCC conclusion that it is «very likely» that anthropogenic factors have «made a substantial contribution to upper ocean warming» using a method independent of observation estimates of the value of individual fluxes.

It is very likely that there is a substantial anthropogenic contribution to the global mean sea level rise since the 1970s.

There is very high confidence that maximum global mean sea level during the last interglacial period (~ 129 to 116 ka) was, for several thousand years, at least 5 m higher than present and high confidence that it did not exceed 10 m above present, implying substantial contributions from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets.

I thought I might be misreading that part, but the very next sentence rejects the IPCC claim that the human contribution to global warming is just «substantial» (the cowards).

«Combining the evidence from ocean warming and mass loss of glaciers we conclude that it is very likely that there is a substantial contribution from anthropogenic forcing to the global mean sea level rise since the 1970s.»

They argue that this «very likely made substantial contributions to the flattening of the global warming trend since about 2000» and that temperatures between 2000 - 2009 would have warmed about 25 percent had stratospheric water vapor remained constant.