This is
a very valid question.
That's
a very valid question.
I think it is
a very valid question.
This is
a very valid question, but it brings about an interesting point about one of the aforementioned games above.
Tim, your friend asks
a very valid question: What if you don't like Zelda?
Because everyone entering this hobby has
that very valid question:
David, that's
a very valid question and the short answer is: yes.
That seems
a very valid question.
That's
a VERY valid question Mark.
Because stomach acid is something our body naturally should produce, this is
a very valid question and concern.
@Juhi:
very valid question.
Joanna's
very valid question: Do or Don't - Grey Hair?
I want to say that I think this is
a very valid question — but the answer to the issue is not so simple as you might think.
Among philosophers,
your very valid question is known as «Pascal's Wager,» because it was first posited by Blaise Pascal, a mathematician and philosopher in the 17th century.
All very valid questions, all impossible to answer without a careful customized analysis!Read More»
Some people have
some very valid questions, like: What if the stock market drops 50 % in value like it has done in the past?
Those would be
very valid questions.
These are
all very valid questions and concerns that make a strong case against purchasing a next - gen console but I'm going to explain why they're also mostly a bunch of BS.
Not exact matches
«As the
very first generation of retirement «do - it - yourselfers» boomers have important,
valid questions and many mistakenly assume that everything they need to know is easily and accurately spelled out in some free online internet resource or available through their advisors,» says Cheryl, a J.D. from Roger Williams University School of Law, in Bristol, RI.
your
question is
very valid and even i asked the same
question, but from God and then He replied.
James, Thanks for asking — Your
question is
very Valid.
Although your
questions are
valid and
very humorous, understand that to believers in Christ, your
questions (or phrasings) would probably be seen as silly (despite how rational you may think they are).
Near the close of the book, Barr again seems to despair of his subject and calls for works in the «Christian doctrine of the Old Testament,» since «traditional Old Testament theology... has often tried to solve
questions which, properly speaking, can not be solved within the horizon of the Hebrew Bible itself and within the boundaries of its resources» (this last is a
very valid point).
I think having
questions about John as a gospel are
very normal — sorry people that disagree — but you have to actually study this phenomenon to have any
valid input.
It may
very well be part of human nature, but that does not make it a
valid question... «Why?»
You've heard players asking a lot of
questions, some of them
very valid, on how it'll be officiated, and the challenges it'll present for those playing a professional sport that moves in short bursts at warp speed.
Chanda's
question above is
very valid — how do we do it differently?
I mean, there is no
question that the scientific community is
very strongly on the side of teaching evolution as an accepted and
valid scientific explanation.
These are
questions without one correct answer,
questions that stimulate discussion and can be a
very powerful way to reinforce the idea that there are different views of an issue, or a set of beliefs that can be equally
valid.
I think the
question is
very valid.
That being said, the
question of margin is a
very,
very valid one.
Although opening a hot dog stand is a
very simplified version of the
question, it is
valid.
So I think I'm asking a
valid question: It's something, obviously,
very important to you, but is it not too much of a focus for a general readership?
These are
questions that are
very valid and it is not to bash the PS3.
I pose the
question not as a sarcastic retort but rather a sincere inquiry in response to some
very valid criticisms that have risen in regards towards games journalism.
I pose the
question not as a sarcastic retort but rather a sincere inquiry in response to some
very valid criticisms...
I actually responded to an entry made about this post but I thought it was a
valid contribution to the general thread of debate here: The general feel I have for services like Twitter is that they provide a
very easy and
very simple way to get the information and thoughts out there for people who don't want the responsibility of running a blog, want to avoid the invasive data - mining of the social network and
very quickly fire off something witty, something silly, something topical or genuinely answer that all important Twitter
question... What are they doing?
As noted multiple times above, your red herring
questions are fine, and the results from them perfectly
valid and
very interesting.
Unless the filer understands the laws well, it is hard to respond to some of the
questions — which, by the way, are
very valid and legitimate
questions for the USCIS to ask.
As you are facing the possibility of a separation and / or divorce, a multitude of
questions and
very valid concerns will likely run through your mind:
The answer to this important and
valid question, usually asked by a home seller or listing prospect, is something that should be explored
very early into every listing presentation.