Sentences with phrase «very warm words»

Not exact matches

Revelations is clearly very accurate, clearly agreeing with moden science computer models regarding global warming predictions, what will happen when a large asteroid strikes (note the word «when») and many other things unknown to science prior to the 21st Century.
These words and the concepts associated with them were very useful for intellectual purposes, but they made no contribution to life, and Levin suddenly felt he was in the position of a man who had exchanged a warm fur coat for a muslin blouse, and who the first time he finds himself in the frost is persuaded beyond question, not by arguments but by the whole of his being, that he's no better than naked and is inevitably bound to perish miserably.16
But it is very nice and heart - warming to hear the kind words of so many other Americans.
But you just know that it will not take much to bring the AOBs out in force again, so our new keeper David Ospina and his warm words of praise for his new manager will be very welcome for the Frenchman.
I imagine all of those kind thoughts and words soaking into her body like warm rays of sunshine, filling her with the very building blocks of love itself.
This all sounds very warm and fuzzy, but I'll admit I often find the word «balance» somewhat loaded.
In other words, if you are warm - toned and freak out a little when you hear «cool - toned pink» just like me, don't worry because it will work very well for you!
smooth, sex appeal, very handsome, honest, passionate, caring, loving, friendly, warm, words can not truley fill ones charcter.
Here's the list of the 128 new movies Inside Llewyn Davis Grudge Match Drew: The Man Behind the Poster Her Safety Not Guaranteed Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues Thanks for Sharing Cutie and the Boxer On the Waterfront That Awkward Moment Warm Bodies Lone Survivor Ride Along Eraserhead Dirty Wars Badlands Labor Day The Lego Movie 3 Women About Last Night Remember Me RoboCop (2014) The Square 20 Feet From Stardom Non-Stop Bottle Rocket The Monuments Men The Grand Budapest Hotel Mulligans Everything or Nothing Veronica Mars Bad Words Elaine Stritch Shoot Me Divergent Muppets Most Wanted Noah Sabotage Captain America: The Winter Soldier Draft Day The Railway Man Transcendence Heaven is for Real Suspicion The Other Woman Short Term 12 Eating Raoul The Amazing Spider - Man 2 Le Week - End Neighbors Million Dollar Arm Godzilla X-Men: Days of Future Past How to Survive a Plague The Normal Heart The Killing Chef A Million Ways to Die in the West Maleficent The Fault in Our Stars Edge of Tomorrow 22 Jump Street How to Train Your Dragon 2 Jersey Boys Transformers: Age of Extinction Tammy Life Itself A Hard Day's Night Begin Again Dawn of the Planet of the Apes Carrie (2013) Sex Tape Snowpiercer Boyhood I Origins You're Next A Most Wanted Man Guardians of the Galaxy The Hundred - Foot Journey Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Only Lovers Left Alive 42 The Giver If I Stay Sin City: A Dame to Kill For Let's Be Cops Sinister Get On Up The Trip to Italy The Drop This Is Where I Leave You The Maze Runner Hector and the Search for Happiness Breathless The Equalizer Gone Girl Annabelle The Sacrament The Judge Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day Fury In a World... Men, Women & Children The Last Time You Had Fun V / H / S: Viral Just Before I Go St. Vincent Birdman Kumiko The Treasure Hunter The Imitation Game Wild Whiplash Nightcrawler Foxcatcher The Orphange Interestellar Big Hero 6 Rosewater Dumb and Dumber To The Theory of Everything The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 Into the Woods Exodus: Gods and Kings Big Eyes The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Stranger By the Lake Top Five The Babadook Annie (2014) Unbroken The Interview
Clearly word got out before it even hit theaters, as he's got a number of very promising projects in the works for early 2013 — he'll play the boyfriend of lead Teresa Palmer in Jonathan Levine «s zombie romance «Warm Bodies ``; he's just one in an excellent ensemble cast, including Jesse Eisenberg, Melanie Laurent, Mark Ruffalo, Morgan Freeman, Isla Fisher, Michael Caine, Common and Woody Harrelson in Louis Letterier «s magician heist movie «Now You See Me ``; and he's playing none another than Romeo in Fox «s Shakesperean re-do «Rosaline.»
Some very smart and dedicated reformers have taken a great deal of unearned demonization from the warm - and - fuzzy teacher union folks — and columnists who love the precision of the word.
The muppets, halter tops, a beloved diner, a French restaurant, peanut butter, Led Zeppelin, open - mic nights, margaritas, billboards, the F - word, saucy texts, the Home Depot, chicken satay and very hot and frisky hijinks over the warm hood of a truck — all of these things and much, much more are part of their courtship, or at least star in metaphors or significant moments, all become part of a building intimacy.
It's a good PR gimmick for the Guardian, and I mean that is a positive way: the story will get lots of ink and will be picked up by the international wire services like AP and Reuters, spreading the word far and wide, and the blogosphere will pick it up as well, and the news of the Guardian's picks will be useful in helping to make more and more people aware of the very real problems of climate change and global warming.
It is very important research, 10,000 years no this words in Inuit but now there are robins everywhere at Arctic, it showed earth is warming.
And, when you consider the dismal (to pick one word) degree of understanding, on average, of global warming among the public, it's hard to arrive at any conclusion other than that the media have dropped (and are dropping) a very big ball.
In other words, and to be very clear: Global warming is causing sea level rise, which is causing more flooding all the time, and it will get worse.
Even the IPCC only claims that it is «very likely» (a judgement, in their own words, not a proof) that human emissions are responsible for «most» of the warming «since the mid-20th century» (1950).
John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position on the greenhouse effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1] basics of the greenhouse effect, the fact that with just a very small percentage of greenhouse gas molecules in the air this effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it would otherwise be, and the fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we have at this point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity of long lived atmospheric greenhouse gases (nearly doubling total that of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against basic physics and basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this would ultimately impact climate.»
In other words, this Tex86 proxy (which is being used very extensively in the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibrated.
In other words, «Forecast the Facts» was originally conceived as a front group controlled by far - left advocacy groups to hide behind while attacking meteorologists, who surveys show tend to be very skeptical of the claims of global warming alarmists.
In other words, A VERY significant % of the American public respond to polling to indicate that they think that ACO2 has no warming effect.
Outside of the pack area, Arctic weather is likewise very warm with North winds not as cold as the word use to mean.
Here is an example of what I'm getting at: * Climate change is a myth or conspiracy - The temperature record is phony - the consensus is just politics * Climate change is unproven - The models are wrong - One hundred years isn't enough evidence * It's not our fault - Volcano's emit way more CO2 - It could be natural variation * A warmer climate is nothing to worry about - It was warmer in the middle ages - A warmer climate is a good thing * Mitigation will destroy the economy - We don't know enough to act - Reducing fossil fuel will destroy us * It's too late or someone else's problem - Kyoto is too little too late - The US absorbs more CO2 than it emits This is very rough example, but if you think it is headed in the right direction, I'd be happy to go through your guide in more detail and come up with something concrete - just give me the word.
In other words, we have seen very close to the amount of warming that we «should have» seen, according to the IPCC.
DEBORAH AMOS: And those are your words, and they used your words as a strategy to undermine the credibility of scientists who - for the most part, there are very few scientists who say that global warming is not a real thing.
In other words, using Snyder's very (and probably too) high ESS value to project future warming is unwarranted and wrong.
In other words, trends and / or variability in larger - scale features of the climate (including rising temperature from global warming) are not very strongly (if at all) related to regional and temporal characteristics of streamflows across the U.S.
In other words, you can take someone out a violent area with a very warm climate and nothing basically changes - well... other than civilization just gets more violence in the cooler climate, obviously.
If this is natural, so if a «warming regime» (the word choice may indicate bias, by the way) is changed unforced into a cooling regime you may very have proven that a positive feedback mechanism due to water vapor is impossible.
The latest attempt to control global warming propaganda is that if you're a scientist who is subject to Natural Resources Canada, you must now submit (note: the word «submit» is very appropriate here because that's really what you're doing if you cow - tow to this turd) a request, obtain pre-approval and only say what they tell you to.
So, that is what we came up with — A few very simple models, such as the one that involves 3 objects: one object A producing thermal energy and radiating energy at a fixed rate, two other objects B and C whose temperature is determined via radiative balance with object A and empty space, with a geometry such that the temperature of object B is higher than that of object C. And, what we wanted to illustrate is that the object C «warms» B in the colloquial sense of the word... i.e., that the presence of object C causes B to be at a higher temperature than if C is absent.
It's a truism that whenever I write about the solid fact that the Earth is warming up, that post will get comments that make it clear that denialists — and please read that link before commenting on my use of the word — are like religious zealots, writing the same tired long - debunked arguments that are usually debunked in the very post they're commenting on.
«International environmental law largely lacks efficient tools in matters of sustainable development and mitigation of global warming; there are simply very limited enforcement mechanisms available to put force behind the words of its international conventions», Ms. Magnusson said in her statement during the session Reforming the International Investment Agreements Regime
Melissa, Thank you for visiting my blog and your kind words:) Your photos are delightful, very warm and cozy!
A very warm welcome to all who are visiting Windmill Words and A Trip to Holland for the first time!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z