Sentences with phrase «very words he spoke»

No, but he was fulfilling the very words spoken by Christ (Matthew 18:7, Luke 17:1)

His passion could be felt from the very words he spoke.

Not exact matches

When he arrived on stage, he did not speak a word, and yet his legs said something very definitive.

The concept, which does not include any spoken words, «was just very direct and honest and we think people respond really well to that.»

The very small rock was speaking to humanity and I am human, so I used the words «we» and «our» in the previous post in a reference to me and all other humans.

Dick Cheney spoke those very words years ago.

An atheist wouldn't take the word spirit or soul literal, but rather, think of it as you might the word «metaphysical» and refer to the very awe and wonder that Nyad spoke about.

Your words, Mark, at the prayer breakfast were 100 % correct: we do have a responsibility to God to do the best we can do... to make good come of heartache... I challenge people reading this to think of and remember the fact that we are AMERICANS and this nation was founded on the very principles of which Mark spoke: a responsibility within ourselves to our Creator to rise to the occasion and make things better... May we all find that courage to do so!

Put an objective observer (I know, there's no such thing) into a community and in a few weeks or months, depending on the complexity of that community, you will be able to describe their political (not a bad word) and social structure, you will uncover their norms and mores, their rules, very often unspoken or only spoken and not written.

Most of us adults have learned that Bible study is a serious matter, that God is up there with His arms crossed making sure we don't get out of line, and that Jesus spoke some very weighty words so we need to get down to business and learn them.

It takes an enormous amount of courage to speak into a very public venue when you are accustomed to having every action, word, personality trait, and even idea quickly, harshly, and repeatedly attacked.

Very impressed that you will speak out against adultery by remarriage, or adulterous behavior, even more than you speak out against homosexual marriage and / or homosexual behavior... after all, the direct words of Jesus should carry far more impact than just the words of Paul or Moses, right?

But the glint in those eyes as he read, as he paused, as he gathered us into his words and his voice, into his very seeing and saying of the world he saw and spoke, that glint betrayed a wisdom and a knowing that came from the country and the land as much as from his deep and wide learning.

Most of the people I know in Hong Kong teach English, and they didn't learn a word of Cantonese, which is a shame, considering Spoken Chinese is actually very easy to learn.

Man is held responsible for his actions: Revelation 20:11 - 15; Galatians 6:7; 1 Corinthians 5:10 The very fact that they are suicidal (ready and willing to kill themselves) proves: 1 Samuel 15:23; Romans 5:1 Suicide goes directly against: Matthew 24:13; John 15:1 - 6; Romans 11:22; 1 Corinthians 15:2; Colossians 1:23; Hebrews 3:6, 14; 12:25; and 1 John 5:4 Committing suicide is not enduring to the end: Matthew 24:13 It is not abiding in Christ: John 15:1 - 6 It is not continuing in His goodness: Romans 11:22 It is not holding fast the word: 1 Corinthians 15:2 It is being moved away from the hope of the gospel: Colossians 1:23 It is not holding fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm to the end: Hebrews 3:6 It is not holding the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end: Hebrews 3:14 It is refusing and turning away from Him who speaks from heaven: Hebrews 12:25 It is not overcoming the world: 1 John 5:4 It is being overcome by the world and the devil: 1 Peter 5:8; 1 John 5:18

He was speaking of that which he saw articulated in the Catholic tradition of Eucharistic worship, as he understood it; yet his words unconsciously echoed a great deal that is most deeply characteristic of Dr. Karl Barth's criticism of what he regards as the very heart and centre of Catholic dogmatics, namely the doctrine of the analogy of being.

At times the two seem to speak separate languages — perhaps most strikingly when they use the very same words.

If we recall Kitchner's hortatory words spoken just five minutes before, we can go to our dreams knowing that this is what our very own culture does better than any other — it defines the ultimate human quest.

the bible talks about the religion of man, verses that of christ, he has not the holy spirit, chris made it very clear who enters heaven, he also said you are either for me or against me, man can not serve two masters, you may know how to read the bible, but without the holy spirit, the truth is hidden from you, they have a form of godlyness, but are without the spirit, they speak wonderful words, but the truth is not in them, many will flock to the anti christ, Obama shows how easy it will be for satan to decieve the world, the bible has a lot to say about the end times, and we are in that area.

When the most significant psychological thinker of our time, Sigmund Freud, points out that words are very often a cover - up and that more truth is to be learned from dreams or even slips of the tongue than from controlled speech, those who preach the Word are going to speak to ever - dwindling audiences.

So while their actions very much speak to the concept of believing in The Christ I have talked about, their words do not.

In fairness to Girard, I must say that he realizes very clearly that the key to the whole problem is found in the Prologue of John, but he writes in the genre of sociological theory rather than the genre of theology, which prevents him from speaking as freely as he might of the Incarnation of the Word of God in human history.

The so - called Second Isaiah, believing that this second exodus signals the realization of the Word of Yahweh to the elected, covenanted Israel, speaks words moving and profound in consolation, but words which, literally taken, were only very briefly and highly approximately validated in the actual history of Israel's second redemption.

Also, the very Word of God speaks that this would happen because of the sins of America.

The Christian believes that He who spoke to Moses and the prophets, and whose very Word became flesh in the man Jesus, is the One who addresses him and calls him to obedience.

Alternatively, if we speak negative words, we are very seriously attracting the demonic to us.

It is very likely that none of the words atributed to jesus were ever actually spoken.

For me it has become the Living Word of God, speaking to me very deeply — though it took some time in my relationship with God for this to happen.

Either they had this psychological illusion, which would be very natural, or, what is more likely, when they tried to tell of their experience the only way they could tell it was in words that led others to think they were speaking of the bodily presence.

Lewis was able to relate complex concepts into very understandable words and phrases and spoke to people as a person who want above them.

At the very same moment, when the flesh of the Word is most utterly flesh, the Word most fully speaks the glory of the Father.

But the very use of the word «impression» reminds us that Jesus comes to us through the life of the church and speaks to us only through that medium.

In the words of an ancient prayer, it is the visible expression of «that wonderful and sacred mystery» which speaks to us and works on us, through the very imperfection, weakness, error, and even the sin of the empirical institution, to manifest in the world of time and space the abiding reality of God's operation in the event of Christ for human wholeness.

This appears clearly enough in the very letter whose opening words have been interpreted as pointing toward «adoptionism»; as, for example, when Paul speaks of God as» sending his own Son.»

First, if God addresses man through the text, the Word of God must, by its very nature, be spoken.

These two are meant to be good for each other, the very crown of the goodness of creation, for they are the animal that has logos, capable of speaking and hearing, and therefore of teaching and learning the word of God.

Suddenly a word came into my mind Cuumara it kept repeating itself to me, I mouthed the strange word, suddenly before I knew it I uttered it out loud, Very Loud, then I said another word like buunara, I carried on for 30 minutes speaking not only the words the Angels use, the heavenly language, but German, Russian, Chinese everything I did not want it to stop, I have never felt so good in my whole life and it has never repeated itself.

In our situation, then, perhaps the very fact that the Bible speaks of history in mythological terms may be a Word to us.

He finds that the old images and truths evoke and clarify what he is today when «some other person» (Jesus, Jeremiah, Augustine, Bonhoeffer or whoever) brings them to the fore by teaching him about them: it is not unknown for someone to find that the words of a service used day after day are the very words he is wanting to speak at present.

Let's not forget we were forwarned about this day, and the very Word of God this man is talking about fortold us: 2 Pteter: 3 14 Therefore, beloved, since you look for these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, spotless and blameless, 15 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.

My understanding is that they are words someone attributed to Jesus — someone who may or may not have heard Jesus actually speak them, but who included them in their gospel for some very specific reason.

You wrote: Alexandria... As I said before... you MUST accept my testimony that you are a false prophet sent to lead us astray because my words are not my own but the very words of God spoken through me.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

Alexandria... As I said before... you MUST accept my testimony that you are a false prophet sent to lead us astray because my words are not my own but the very words of God spoken through me.

But no; this is not to go over to well with the unbelievers, very few believed Jesus and the disciple's spoke forth as the Holy Spirit gave them the words to speak forth, and God is still the same today and they call themselves Christians but they live in unbelief: They truly think that God has changed His ways:

And here, though by «Christianity» he means something very definite (i.e., Roman Catholicism), his words taken at face value speak for the vast majority of believing Christians no matter what their denomination.

When Whitehead speaks of efficacious processes as transitions (PR 150/227; 210/320) he is using the very same word to express the same state of affairs, even if no direct historical connection of the usage can be demonstrated.

Faith must always be able to speak of the Word which is actually present, and to speak to the actuality of the world and experience which it confronts; otherwise, it will relapse into immobility and silence, thereby betraying the very vocation of faith.

He recalled how his fellow priests had in many cases become very casual, and how in Rome «I heard, among other clever and coarse anecdotes at mealtimes, members of the papal curia laugh and boast about how some said Mass and with reference to the bread and wine spoke these words: ««Panis es, panis manebis; vinum es, vinum manebis» — «Bread you are and bread you shall remain; wine you are, and wine you shall remain» — and with these words they elevated the host and the wine in the usual way.

«Glory for me», the old gospel - hymn is supposed to have sung — but the very words show that the hymn is not about the gospel, for the gospel speaks of «Glory to God», in whose «glory» all good is contained.