Sentences with phrase «very wrong point»

The guy I replied to was clearly using a fallacious argument to somehow prove his very wrong point.

Not exact matches

But it was very clear from the very beginning on the part of the actual Congressmen that they weren't going to support it because they had already come out on the floor with such vehement opposition to the bill and pointing out exactly what was wrong with the bill, that it didn't have to be done in a hurry.

Lloyd Blankfein has tried to ease concerns among shareholders that Goldman Sachs may be ploughing into consumer credit at the wrong point in the cycle, stressing that the bank was «being very careful» in its pivot from Wall Street to Main Street.

The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?

Indeed, the history of the faith, and the teachings of Scripture itself, show that Tim Challies is dead wrong on one very important point:

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

This new confidence was first prompted, unless memory at this point is all wrong, by two very hard facts: the invincibility of a clear - headed medical student dying of cancer, and the impassive bulk of the Rockies above timber line, which I saw for the first time four months later.

Less persuasive, to me at least, is the claim that this probably continued until 1931, the year in which Lewis converted to Christianity (and would now think a relation with a married woman to be wrong) Wilson's way of making this point is, however, an instance of a very undesirable trait in his writing: the tendency to assert indirectly and to be glib while seeming to eschew it: «It would be far too glib to suggest that he consciously made the second change, to adopt Christianity, merely to give himself an excuse to abandon sexual relations with Mrs. Moore, whatever the nature of those relations had been.»

I would just figure that you might at one point did believe in god, correct me if i am wrong, but if it is true i pray that you find your way back to the thing that you might very well know to be the truth and that is Jesus.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt early on, even though every single person I have encountered, who is of the Reformed persuasion, has proven to be extremely capable of pointing out to everyone else where everyone else is wrong, and can do it in such a way as to give you the impression that, not only do they want to correct your erroneous beliefs, but also want to make sure you feel very, very bad about being completely wrong.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

«I immediately pointed out that not only is a prayer at a public ceremony unconsti - tutional, but to force someone to give the illusion of religion when the individual does not believe in any religion is blatantly wrong and very illegal,» the soldier said in an e-mail to the foundation.»

Even before we started examining our candidates we pointed out that any authority that makes for sight instead of faith is wrong by the very nature of the Christian kind of authority.

N.F. 26, 1951] when he contends that it is wrong to raise the question of hermeneutics at this point, and in particular I think he is evading the issue when he says that the controversy as to whether there is a special theological hermeneutics as well as hermeneutics in general is not very fruitful.

I'm gonna let you all continue this conversation, but first I want to point out that you are all wrong, very very wrong... unless you agree with me.

Though concern for natural law is not wrong per se, Westberg points out that Aquinas himself gave very little space to it in his lengthy Summa.

People (most often times very politely, so thank you) point out that my nutritional information is wrong, and that the actual stats are higher.

My parents» recent and surprising divorce had left me, at 21 years old, with the sense that everything I knew about the world up to that point had been wrong, or at the very least, lacking.

I'm getting annoyed that people fail to notice the positive he did recently (he started spending money, keep the team in tact, getting a new physio in, try to win game ugly when result is getting bad) while it is very fair points that he made very wrong judgement in not getting enough defensive cover, and his players are naive at time in term of tactics.

It seems like a very harsh punishment for putting on the wrong tightie whities, but it was a clear breach of safety regulations, hence the fine and the points.

Chambers is the new per and Ospina very lucky Also gone right off mustafi he's very good at pointing figures at the rest of team when things wrong.

We're obviously still waiting for real confirmation that Granit Xhaka is officially an Arsenal player, but if at this point the deal doesn't go through then something is very, very wrong.

This isn't just one of those cases where a news report got something wrong, it's an instance of getting something so very wrong that it's beyond the point of being amusing.

COYG great win good performance important 3 points can't believe the critisim were getting from fans on here on the other post after we won wtf is wrong with you great result we should all be very happy COYG

Tell me what he has done wrong in this game, he had not a great game but he had a good game.Did he had to score to be good in your eyes, from my point he had a very good contribution defensively and offensively.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We actually have a net spend of about 120 - 130m since hes been back whereas Chelsea only have a net spend of about 30m so he isn't wrong and has a very big point but the differnece is we're spending our own money, rather than just some rich sugar daddy.

For someone who «barely care about the 49ers at this point», you seem very busy administering your opinion on what they should do and everything wrong about this situation as it stands so far....

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Who cares I do nt tonight three points but feel like we lost something very wrong begind closed doors.

Sanchez has lost his MOJO no question, same happened to OZIL at some point, the similar patter has a logical explanation, both came from Clubs with a philosophy of WIN IT ALL they both realized they came to the wrong team with a very wrong Manager

Guys why are we comparing arsenal to barca i love arsenal it my club but i must be realistic barca is lite years infront of us look at the champions league last year no match they have won the champions league twice in the last five years and the last one with kids just like arsenal so its not about how young players are because if your good enough your old enough and am afraid the arsenal youngsters walcott, deneilson, nasri, diaby, bendtner, even the great vanpercy who all arsenal fans rate who as i mentioned before (Has not scored a free kick in god knows how long) world class right these players so far have not been good enoughso do nt blame injuries too much do nt blame refs look at the way arsenal do things something is wrong here is a prime example eboue joined arsenal in the 2004/2005 season to date now tell me that a long time right would you say he is a much better player than when he arrived i think no he has improved but only very little and thats the point football is a short business at a big club you spend three seasons for the most and then you must perform.

I hate to commends of people who are not technicalily sound upstears, Every line ups DM has given man united sinch he took over 4rm SAF are very wrong starters only but two that he won will, WIGAN, AND SWANSEA.First two games.after then he start changing center half like bank not and usings wingers who cant run buying mata and using him as a winger and leaving Kagawa and Chicharito on the bench 4 God seck the team won the league with 14 point ahead.wrong subs and changing winning teams / center halfs are his wick point.4 me Sack should be Sweet.I CAN DO THIS JOB, HIRE ME.

This particular point was very important for me, because the hospital called and got the wrong information from someone at my insurance, and after being told it was covered, we got the fancy breast pump, only to find out four months later that it was not covered at all and we owed like $ 300.

But the experiment does make the point, I think, that for all the school food improvements we've seen in our district (and I'm grateful for all of them, don't get me wrong), there are still offerings that permit kids to make very poor selections on the lunch line, selections that may well have an adverse impact on their health down the line.

As Michela Wrong pointed out in an article written at the time of the first DRC elections in 2006 — and which still proves potentially timely for today's situation — «If all hell breaks loose in the DRC [after the elections]... it will be tragic evidence of the damage a very human inclination to hope for the best can do» (Wrong, 2006).

He sees the momentum of this «town on the move» as resting largely in the hands of the incoming Town Board members, who make most of the crucial decisions: «It's very easy to point to what you think is wrong; the real challenge is to point to what is right and how you can make it better,» says Zatz.

A very senior Commons source has pointed out that I was wrong on this.

What is wrong at this point in time for Dr. Bawumia to say this is the amount that I spent on it, that is very important.»

It is very important to point out that the majority of first time users get the motions they are supposed to be making with their vertical climber completely wrong.

The film seems to funnel to the point that there is a very fine line between right and wrong for those in law enforcement.

Unlike many other character actors, he had been wrong on that point for quite a few yearsâ $» at the very least, since late 1967, when filmgoers first heard the line «What we have here is failure to communicate» out of the mouth of the pusselgutted chain - gang overseer in Stuart Rosenberg's Cool Hand Luke.

Sometimes they will get what they need in two; in very rare instances, they will need as many as 13 takes, but «at that point, everyone's freaking out — something's really wrong.»

Instead it feels very much like the «quality» Hollywood system — complete with Judd Apatow's cameo as a truth - telling producer — pointing at a rank outsider and noticing everything he did wrong.

It's very fair to point a finger at Chef for being an overdone attempt at sending a personal message and there are very few surprises in the narrative, but what's wrong with that when the film works so well?

Things went very wrong, though, as these things tend to do, and the survivors, including Orange, White, Mr. Pink (Steve Buscemi), and Mr. Blonde (Michael Madsen) pull themselves to the rendezvous point to puzzle out what exactly happened.

Mike Antonucci pointed out that we've heard the same «teacher shortage» cry before (by the same people), and it turned out to be very, very wrong.

And agency fees require, as I understand it — correct me if I'm wrong — agency fees require that employees and teachers who disagree with those positions must nevertheless subsidize the union on those very points.

That's not CR fans picking and choosing talking points to support their perspective - that's just the cold, hard ugly truth that something is very wrong with the Rules / Regs utilized in» 11.

At this point I decided that I'd spent enough time trying to hassle with this and, since I must doing something very simple wrong, my best alternative was to simply call customer service.