Sentences with phrase «very wrong predictions»

Not exact matches

The role of the fans at this juncture it our club's history appears lost of most individuals who frequent this site following a victory... I'll explain further, but first I must state that I have cared for this club dearly for the better part of 35 years, so my critique is both measured and carefully considered... there is certainly nothing wrong with celebrating a victory, regardless of the circumstances, but making wild predictions or fawning over players after a lacklustre win solves very little, if anything it enables those in charge to continue down the road too frequently traveled

Still, his prediction back in January that the opinion polls were getting it badly wrong — overestimating the Labour vote and underestimating the Conservatives» — has very much come to pass.

What appears utterly extraordinary at first — sending someone correct predictions of the winners of six races — seems very ordinary as soon as you understand that thousands of people got wrong predictions.

Harry Dent, Charles Kadlec, and the crew that put together Dow 36,000 created their own sensational predictions which proved to be controversial and very wrong.

The consensus model of climate has a long track record of successful predictions — that makes it very unlikely that it is fundamentally wrong.

So it appears to be very likely that there must be something wrong with the alarmists» ideas, not just random prediction errors.

The largest year - to - year average global temperature change on record is less than 0.3 °C, so this was a rather remarkable prediction, and not surprisingly turned out to be very wrong.

Within a very short time (22 yrs), the recorded minimum (1964) and maximum (1986) GL levels suggested to me that models and predictions of water levels made by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE)(Detroit District) have been consistently wrong.

This is not black or white, because the prediction may be approximately correct for some variables and wrong for some other variables, and because one can distinguish different degrees of beliefs about the likelihood that a prediction will (or might) come true [very uncertain, possible, very unlikely,..

One scientist who recently published a study that found that the IPCC predictions were very accurate argues that it is likely wrong.

As we have discussed often at «C3», most of the IPCC climate predictions have proven to be wrong - certainly, one can fairly conclude that actual climate science is very unsettled at this point in time.

I'm afraid all my efforts to match recorded observations to them only seem close to matching the very coldest 1990 predictions and I'd love to see a graph that can more clearly show me where I'm going wrong.

All of their predictions were wrong from the very first Report.

The predictions were not wrong — very good in parts but necessarily lacking precision in others.

I suggest that our track record to date is infinitely superior to that of the global warming alarmists including the IPCC, who have been wrong in all their very - scary predictions.

I think Mr Hansen has a very poor record of predicting things — he has been shown to be wrong many times — I wont list his poor predictions now — but can if you really want me to, including references.

But the point was: It is wrong to suggest that real - world development - related policy decisions are routinely based on very precise predictions of future problems, and that we can not act on climate change because the models do not meet these alleged standards.

Leif Svalgaard (07:19:39): -LRB-...) The reason they cherry picked the «wrong peak» was to conform to the Dikpati et al prediction of a very large cycle which was at the time politically favored by NASA.

And actually, my final conclusion is that there is nothing actually «wrong» with the basic science — it already includes these lower factors and a low prediction for doubling in 2050, but there is an assumption that this low prediction is very unlikely.

See page 31 - 33 of http://www.leif.org/research/Predicting%20the%20Solar%20Cycle.pdf The reason they cherry picked the «wrong peak» was to conform to the Dikpati et al prediction of a very large cycle which was at the time politically favored by NASA.

And one final prediction: I probably got most of this wrong because, by its very nature, the confluence of politics, the law and the courts makes for a very unpredictable beast.

So, it is getting very clear that it is volatile and every prediction goes wrong.