Sentences with phrase «very wrong side of»

We see the Riggins brothers (warriors with big hearts but no prudence or book learning from the very wrong side of town) saying «Texas forever» and staying around in Dillon as a family.

Not exact matches

Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do not want you to come against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side witnesses as His testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God does not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?

I was wondering what I might have done wrong that would cause my loaf to get very soft and fall over the sides of the pan when it was rising?

Team Reisner battled with a very good Team Harlander squad on Sunday Night and came out on the wrong side of it.

I might be wrong but I think we are going to see a very strong Arsenal side in the FA cup today and I am also expecting them to put on a strong show to give Burnley a proper taste of what the Gunners can do.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

He was very highly rated but was also known to get on the wrong side of referees for his rash challenges.

This of course was masked by us reaching Wembley for the 2016 FA Cup Final against our friends from the red side of Manchester, however, it was clearly going very wrong on the pitch in the league, woeful performances, no gusto on display.

It was a very scrappy affair that saw PSG squeeze past the lower league side thanks to a Zlatan Ibrahimovic header, and although the French champions were in control for most of the game, it could've gone very wrong if they managed to concede a goal.

It was the usual guff he'd used very effectively against Ed Miliband for years: find a tiny hinge upon which to flip the party onto the wrong side of public opinion, and then make everything about that.

You and I could both find ourselves on the wrong side of the law very quickly for helping as many people as we have.

I mean, obviously when you are born on the wrong side of the world... it might be very hard to see or impossible.

A film that hold the audience's attention from start to finish and will play very well on both sides of the pond.The authenticity of the sets and period detail compliment the superb acting performances especially by Colin Firth.I previously thought Colin Firth lacked depth - how wrong I was!

As Ryse takes us back to the old times of Rome, Playing as one of the heroes of Rome the game gives us an exciting battle system that lets the players attack an enemy from one side while quickly turning around to block other attacks from the different directions, Blocks & counters are essential in the game if you don't get used to blocking you won't be surviving very long, from what they've shown us so far I dare say that the gameplay might actually get boring & repetitive quite quickly actually but gameplay is not always everything, and don't get me wrong the gameplay is not actually bad but it could have been alot better!

It's not always successful, the film can topple onto the wrong side of silly at times, but after a very shaky opening 15 minutes I warmed to it and tapped into the unusual tone and bafflingly peculiar goings on.

Even if the filmmaker and the titular exiled former spy very well end up on the right side of history someday, Stone's film is one - sided, unbalanced, and downright sensationalizing in painting a hero that can conceivably do no wrong.

If you said squares, Spanish moss and sweet tea, you wouldn't be wrong — but reading the latest novel from the acclaimed writer Jonathan Rabb shines a spotlight on a very different side of one of the South's most famous cities.

Stubbornness is very expensive in the markets when you are on the wrong side of a trend.

I have a 4 yr old English springer and she is the most loveable dog you could have but the last couple of weeks she has started biting objects and turning very aggressive when you try and get them off her this is so out of character for her I'm worried something maybe wrong she has also started to scavenge for food when she has loads in her bowl she has even pinched food off the side which she has never done please help me help her.

All of these valves move similar to trapdoors and have a very important function to keep blood flowing forward within their corresponding side of the circulation and prevent backflow in the wrong direction.

I loved the free ferries that cross the Amstel River and take you to the central station — very handy when your ship is dry docked on the wrong side of the river to all the action!

Skip through most walls, die to win most boss battles, skip half the story by entering the wrong side of Gloomy Woods... it's very likely that by this point, the possible world record for the title is approaching the hour and a half mark, for a game which is supposed to take nearer thirty hours.

I am sorry but I think that Foukal el al's paper is very biased in the references they decided to use and dismiss all debates and, paradoxically, they arrive at the conclusion that the side of the debate they represent is likely wrong!!!

I went out one day to find a (very slow - moving bus) which had crossed to the wrong side of the road, mounted the payment, and was about to drive into my basement area.

What's scary is that the side of this debate that is wrong, and that is wrong in a way that will very probably lead to worldwide disaster in a few generations, is taken seriously because it is the side taken by one of America's two dominant political parties.

This does not necessarily mean the climate alarmists are wrong; it means that they should have humility and be open to the very cogent middle - ground of «lukewarming» — and the positive side of man - made warming, CO2 fertilization, and fossil - fuel appreciation.

James Delingpole makes the point very clearly at the end of the entry on «Global Warming» in his book How to be Right: «if the climate change doom mongers are really so sure all the evidence is on their side, why are they so keen to stifle any arguments which threaten to prove them wrong?»

The Climate Change «side,» is based upon the presumption that such a radical atmospheric alteration would lead to increasing change for reasons that have been articulated for years, and that has even risen to the level of a theory now for many years, and has been further corroborated and strengthened by the very process of science that skeptics seek to constantly castigate and denigrate, rather than simply «show to be wrong.»

The AMO is a toothless tiger, and any CS estimate based upon the notion that it raised global temperatures in the last half of the 20th century is likely very wrong on the low side.

Martha: The Sydney Institute provides a forum for all sides on this issue and on many others, both conservative and Leftist — it's one of the very few in the country that do — so you're wrong to discount the work by its association with this venue.

And if this process of water changing state, which is pretty much just a process of physics and a bit of chemistry, is so very easy to get wrong — specifically, is so easy to model too conservatively so the models predict wrongly that it will be a very slow process when in fact it seems to be a much faster process — how confident can we be that other models and estimates of processes that involve multiple feedbacks that include chemical and biological interactions as well as physical ones aren't even more wildly inaccurate on the «conservative» side?

It seemed to me very accident - prone to drive on the wrong side of the road, but there were a lot of buses and also smaller vehicles.

I think everyone must try their very hardest to be on the side of right vs wrong, & yeah I guess I wouldn't mind seeing less high paid defence attorneys walking around with huge bank accounts, and happy faces, while we pay minumum fees to prosecution lawyers.