Sentences with phrase «very wrong views»
Especially be careful of blogs like CC who have very fixed, and IMHO, very wrong views of investing.
http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/ Not exact matches
While many nations in Europe are non-religious, their basis for right and wrong is based upon a very Christian world view.
It sometimes came across as a very shallow view of faith and could give off the wrong idea about what it's like to follow Jesus.
Indeed, all that has gone — in my view — so wrong in the last ten years could in the next decade be transformed again and made very right.
He had very strong views regarding right and wrong behavior.
But Christianity seems to be nearly unique in its insistence that not only is everyone else wrong, but it is written into the very structure of reality that all those wrong people will be horribly punished for their incorrect views.
Surely, in principle there is nothing wrong with a modification of Whitehead if it can be viewed as in improvement, but I see no reason to evaluate this as such, because Whitehead's own (implicit) conception seems to me very rich in possibilities when it comes to the interpretation of theological issues like «conscience» and «grace,» for example.46
The only way he can stay is if the senior players stand up to him and make him change his views (not going to happen), or he admits he's got it wrong and change beyond all recognition (very unlikely).
It's a shame really how people are so plastic over here.We seem to change our views so easily.Why can't people just make up their minds?It's like people don't have stance.As I've been saying and will keep saying we have many good players but as good as they are they're overrated.We've just compromised as a club.There are problems in every single role in the team, from defence to attack.Yet these problems will constantly be ignored.Some players are cleary not good enough but say it and the stats lovers will come out.The main problem wrong with the team is the centre.The other problem is Wenger and his misuse of players.I for one don't really rate Ramsey - Xhaka partnership in a sense that it's defensively weak with Xhaka not good enough defensively and Ramsey very inconsistent.The only player excellent defensively in the centre in Arsenal's team is Coquelin and I think he should be playing though many won'tsee why.Look how easily the balls went through the midfield.Coquelin should be partnered with another CM in our current team.People shouldn't deceive themselves Xhaka that Xhaka isn't a DM.He's just not good defensively admit it.We need a DM more than a CM in my opinion or a hybrid like Sanches or Jankto.
But you are wrong about my views and my opinions and it is very clear that you are quite anti home birth and fairly jaded at that.
The post-Powellite far right are a lot more conflicted of course - having to argue that we destroyed our society 70 years ago («national suicide» said Powell: very conflicted, pretty resentful, but I am sure he was wrong, and in 2011 that view and vision offers us nothing except a tragic nihilism) and so can't be proud of the society we have become.
Sen. Ruben Diaz, Sr was very wrong in his statement, as a Senator it appears he was not representing his constituents, but representing his OWN views and the views he feels in church.
I looked online and of course found many different views on how to train for a marathon, and of course plenty of debate between runners as to what was the right or wrong way to train, the similarities with the weight loss websites out there was very evident to me, It was hard to know what to do.
Normally, I don't really drink that much soda, but something had gone very wrong, I was... View Post
It becomes very clear through viewing the film and selected extra features later on that Fincher had a very specific vision with this film, and it seems he's taken the opportunity given by this special re-release to go back and right the wrongs of the past.
From its very conception, BULLETPROOF MONK is all wrong, only to be compounded by some very bad dialogue from screenwriters Ethan Reiff and Cyrus Voris, and it will come as no surprise to anyone who views this that TALES FROM THE CRYPT: DEMON KNIGHT would be their biggest claim to fame in film to date.
The miScroll's screen isn't of very good quality, with poor viewing angles leaving the picture looking very dim and bereft of shadow detail if viewed in the wrong way.
Wexboy, Reference your 30th Sept current summary in KR1, From my point of view I am in awe of your 2 % holding in KR1, The figures are very compelling and staggering in forward potential, I might have this projection all wrong but here goes, As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, s?
[Response: Dyson is wrong on many issues and displays a shocking ignorance of climate modelling despite holding very strong views on the matter.
He (if I'm right about him), and many others with very right wing political views, are not questioning the scientific consensus because they genuinely believe it to be wrong.
In my experience, people with very strong views will often refuse to admit they're wrong, even after being presented with irrefutable proof.
May I make clear that (a) I state no claims and submit no proofs, just my personal view of what the climate effects are (for what this might be worth as an interested but non - scientific commentator to this blog) and (b) I hesitate to cross swords with such a learned gentleman as yourself and will be very happy to stand corrected, as your view that «that the temperature of the Earth is kept within a fairly narrow range through the action of a variety of natural homeostatic mechanisms» is very seductive — but I am afraid I still personally think it is wrong.
Alston, your very first statement, «The overall problem with models is that they are designed from the start to view GHGs as the central assumption,» is wrong.
Because of this very affiliation, they were suddenly viewed as «essential», «unfirable» etc. — it would be wrong even if the IPCC didn't have the alarmist bias.
Or perhaps even «misunderstood» is wrong, but understood from a very different point of view, like a reflection in a fun - house mirror where everything is there but it is distorted in a host of ways that make discussion impossible.
May I give my personal opinion about Judith Curry: from my point of view, the way she expresses her concerns about climate science is very close to the ideal scientific attitude, trying to be balanced and free from ideological a priori (this doesn't mean of course that she is always right, although I did not notice anything wrong in what she said).
In the three P2P cases tried so far, «all three of those juries demonstrated through the very large damages awards they imposed that they view illegal downloading and «sharing» as wrong, and deserving of harsh sanction.»
He also maintains, according to a very formalistic and ultimately wrong view, that the only principles ranked as «fundamental» are those set out in Article 1 to 12 of the Italian Constitution.