Sentences with phrase «via court rule»

The vast majority of states either place the membership directly into the constitution (24 states), as Georgia currently has, or the membership is set by the state's supreme court / court of last resort via court rule (10 states).

Not exact matches

In 2014, when Obamacare came before the Supreme Court via the Hobby Lobby case, the court ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the contraceptive mandate on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female emploCourt via the Hobby Lobby case, the court ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the contraceptive mandate on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female emplocourt ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the contraceptive mandate on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female employees.

Even more sad republicans did not win the election putting them in govt such election win gained came via massive voting fraud / coupled with the corrupt ruling of an supreme court decision / awarding them victory.

In Germany, the supreme court just ruled that someone conceived via insemination has the right to know the father, the sperm - donor.

Many of these rules come about via statute while others emerge from the courts in the resolution of common law issues, in particular issues of tort.

A bevy of unfavorable federal court rulings blocked the implementation of Trump's initial attempt at temporarily barring arrivals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Sudan, Syria and Somalia via executive order in January, prompting the administration to announce it would issue a new fiat instead of defending the original.

«Our timely study builds on previous research from UH scientists and recent federal court rulings that show that treated wastewater is illegally discharged to the ocean from injection wells at the Lahaina Wastewater Reclamation facility via SGD to Kahekili Beach Park on West Maui,» said Daniel Amato, lead author and recent graduate of the UHM College of Natural Sciences.

-LSB-...] Third, although Baucus may not acknowledge it, his «too much power into few hands» argument is tacit criticism of the Supreme Court's ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, which both authorized and pushed EPA to regulate greenhouse gases via the Clean Air Act.

And even though this ruling was challenged by state officials and the Virginia Education Association thereafter, Virginia SGP posted via his Facebook page the millions of student records the state released in compliance with the court, with teacher names and other information redacted.

Earlier this year, courts ruled that the use of Kindle devices in the classroom was discriminatory against students with disabilities since navigation of menus via the popular text - to - speech option was unavailable and therefore the device was effectively inaccessible to the visually impaired.

A German court has ruled that Amazon's «share» functionality, which encourages users to promote links to products that they have just purchased via email or social networks, is unlawful.

Today, Art Market Monitor (via Le Monde) reports that a French court has ruled in favor of the estate of the photographer Jean - François Bauret in a plagiarism case against the American artist Jeff Koons.

via: SCOTUS Blog photo: Hispanic PR Wire Supreme Courtâ $ ¨ Supreme Court Lets Big Business Off the Hook in the Mystery of the $ 42 Million Pesticide Dump â $ ¨ Whales 0, Navy 1: Court Rules in Favor of Lifting Restrictions on Harmful Sonar Use Supreme Court Delivers Landmark Ruling on Greenhouse Gases

Why didn't counsel for EPA explain to the Supreme Court that an endangerment finding would lead, via a tailpipe rule, to absurd results?

Earlier this month the Court of Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion about how the verdict form woCourt of Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion about how the verdict form wocourt because of confusion about how the verdict form worked.

On Aug. 30, the Court of Appeals of the State of Mississippi issued a ruling (via the Legal Profession Blog) in which it reversed the 2009 manslaughter conviction of Justin Thomas because the lower court refused to give a requested jury instruction regarding the castle doctCourt of Appeals of the State of Mississippi issued a ruling (via the Legal Profession Blog) in which it reversed the 2009 manslaughter conviction of Justin Thomas because the lower court refused to give a requested jury instruction regarding the castle doctcourt refused to give a requested jury instruction regarding the castle doctrine.

Additional coverage of the trial court's ruling in this case can be accessed via Citizen Media Law Project, «Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.&rcourt's ruling in this case can be accessed via Citizen Media Law Project, «Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.&rCourt Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.»

This decision is also worth reviewing for Mr. Justice Groves discussion of Rule 23 - 5 and the circumstances when the Court should allow a party to attend a Court Proceeding via telephone.

TORONTO — The mandatory minimum sentence of one year in prison for luring a child into sexual activity via the internet is unconstitutional, Ontario's top court has ruled.

Again via Courthouse Libraries BC, I see the CBABC issued a media release on the ruling: Court Ruling a «Win» for Equality and Access to Jruling: Court Ruling a «Win» for Equality and Access to JRuling a «Win» for Equality and Access to Justice

(v) In the absence of specific evidence of undue hardship, the Agency's rejection of VIA's economic arguments was inconsistent with the rule established by the Supreme Court that «impressionistic evidence of increased expense will not generally suffice.»

The Alberta Rules of Court, consolidated to September 1, 2014 are available to all via the Alberta Queen's Printer website.

The Supreme Court could effectively abolish it by ruling that it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment (which also applies to the states via the incorporation doctrine and the Fourteenth Amendment).

Perhaps because Judge Carton's rulings are not technically binding, Salt Lake County District Court Judge Deno G. Himonas felt the need to rule on the case late last month, as well (via Lowering the Bar and OnPointNews).

As my boss Diana Lowe pointed out to me, making the deliberations of a rules committee available via the internet may affect or limit the range of presentations made by counsel in court, whereas rules are formulated to stand on their own, and counsel needs to try them in all ways to see if they are sound.

The AG suggested, in reference to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling, that the Court must declare that it has jurisdiction for the main reason that the HTSs should be regarded as acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union for the purposes of Article 267 of the Treaty on the functioning of the Union («TFEU»), which is the primary law basis of the cooperation between the CJEU and the national courts via the preliminary ruling system.

In June last year, a Belgian court in SABAM v Tiscali (Scarlet) District Court of Brussels, No 04 / 8975 / A, 29 June 2007, ruled that an ISP should install filtering software to prevent its customers illegally downloading music via peer - to - peer syscourt in SABAM v Tiscali (Scarlet) District Court of Brussels, No 04 / 8975 / A, 29 June 2007, ruled that an ISP should install filtering software to prevent its customers illegally downloading music via peer - to - peer sysCourt of Brussels, No 04 / 8975 / A, 29 June 2007, ruled that an ISP should install filtering software to prevent its customers illegally downloading music via peer - to - peer systems.

In many cases, after consultation first with the ABA via the Conference of Chief Justices, and then with their respective state and local bar associations, the state supreme courts adopt the Rules with limited (and oftentimes no) modifications.

While state supreme courts (usually after consultation with the ABA via the Conference of Chief Justices and with state and local bar associations) often adopt the ABA's Model Rules and while they often delegate disciplinary authority to a state bar association, there is no legal requirement that they do either, and they may at any time stop doing so, and

In the NederlandFM case, the Dutch court ruled that the copyright holder had not taken into account the people that listened to internet radio via hyperlinks.

As reported in this post from yesterday, and as explained a bit more via this write - up I provided to the fine folks at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court yesterday in Dean v. United States, No. 15 - 9260 (April 3, 2017)(available here) ruled that the Eighth Circuit had been wrong to hold that, «in calculating the sentence for [a] predicate offense, a judge must ignore the fact that the defendant will serve the mandatory minimums imposed under § 924 (c).»

Rule 18 - A permits claims to proceed to court via «summary trial».

Most of the time, the defendant will challenge the foreign judgment or ruling in the Taiwanese court because the foreign court does not use judicial assistance via a diplomatic channel for the service of legal documents in Taiwan.

The Hague Convention you identify is generally enforced in the domestic courts of the country where the child is physically located that has child custody jurisdiction or via a «Central Authority» as defined by a signatory to the Convention, although it is a bit more complex than that because the Hague Convention has one set of rules for «emergencies» and another for ordinary cases.

The government had to respond to the Federal Court's ruling in Allard v Canada that forcing individuals to get their medical marijuana from licensed producers (via the mail) was a violation of section 7 of the Charter.

Had the Anastasoff case not become moot before the en banc Eighth Circuit could reach the merits, was it your prediction that the en banc court would have agreed with you the local rule declaring unpublished opinions non-precedential should be abolished, and why has the Eighth Circuit not repealed, via the rulemaking process, the rule your panel opinion condemned as unconstitutional?

You can access the rulings via that court's Twitter feed.

According to the Finnish Treasury, seized bitcoins will be converted into euros after a court ruling via public auctions.

via Norwich father urges judges to publish rulings on his decade - long family court battle which has cost him more than # 500,000 — Crime — Eastern Daily Press

*** I think that Mr. Dale has shown me «enough» reason via his legal manouverings and depositions that he should be allowed, by me singularly, to «legally» proceed with his action against TREB and CREA, because I think that a court action is the only way to solve this ongoing dispute, at least prior to leading up to the inevitable appeal procedures that are surely to be employed by either party to the dispute, depending upon how and why the court rules.

Therefore, the court ruled that «present» in the bylaws was understood to mean present either physically present or via proxy.

Since the parties had allocated their risks via contract and A.M. met the terms of the clause, the court ruled that the exculpatory clause protected A.M.