Not exact matches
From about 0.7 solar radii to the Sun's visible
surface, the material in the Sun is not dense enough or hot enough to transfer the heat energy of the interior outward
via radiation.
CO2 reduces the rate at which the atmosphere loses its energy to space
via infrared
radiation, which in turn reduces the flow of energy
from the Earth's
surface to the atmosphere.
Heat radiates
from the Earth's
surface via thermal or (roughly) «blackbody»
radiation.
The best papers I've read (so far) that seek to explain how things like the DALR and wet air lapse rates effect the actual transport of heat
from the solar - heated
surface and atmosphere to where it is ultimately lost
via radiation are really quite good.
But don't take to much notice of me as I also believe that Advection i.e. the kind of horizontal air movements that follow isobaric
surfaces and therefore are predominantly horizontal) have got more of a Green House Effect (GHE) than does a
radiation circuit, of say 324 W / m ² originally removed
from the
surface, and then returned
via Green House Gases (GHGs)-- which, by the way, show no sign of having warmed at all (no hot spot) But even so, when somehow the same 324 W / m ² are delivered back to the
surface for absorption it is supposed to be getting warmer.
Energy is received by the Earth's
surface directly
from the sun and also
via long - wave
radiation from the atmosphere.
I strongly believe that the
surface temperature of the passive sphere will be less than the
surface temperature of the active sphere; and energy will flow
via radiation from the active to the passive sphere.