The move to develop the technology finds Purse pitching its implementation - one that is today an alternative to versions by Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Unlimited - as a third option in the scaling debate that would bring about a block size increase and malleability fix
via soft fork, or a change that doesn't risk splitting the bitcoin blockchain.
«The Bitcoin Core team believes doing a hard fork at the present time is needlessly risky, and is instead pursuing SegWit
via a soft fork for a similar sized potential gain in throughput.»
In the past, some have criticized Bitcoin Core contributors» preference for implementing Segregated Witness
via a soft fork due to the perceived complexity involved with the code involved in making these improvements.
Having said that, Bitcoin Core contributor and spokesperson Eric Lombrozo told Bitcoin Magazine that an increase
via a soft fork is a possibility.
Increases
via a soft fork, such as extension blocks, have been discussed in the past.
[12] This multi-layer architecture allows for easier updates
via soft forks than Ethereum does; in Ethereum these two layers are intertwined.
Not exact matches
Also beneficial, developers argued, was that it could be introduced
via a mechanism called a
soft fork (meaning that miners who adopted it could co-exist on the network with those that did not).
Segregated Witness can be implemented more simply and cleaner
via a hard
fork, but Bitcoin Core has opted for a more complex
soft fork.
Soft forks as implemented
via BIP 9 can motivate users to react with their own hard
fork, but the split chain is not the default (as it is with hard
forks).
To date, new versions of the bitcoin software have been rolled out
via voluntary
soft forks.
In order to activate Lightning in the bitcoin ecosystem, SegWit had to be activated
via a User Activated
Soft Fork (UASF) which required more than 90 % of the network to agree on the protocol upgrade.