In fact, as we're blogging, our team is engaging with our users to get feedback on current and future offerings
via usability tests, face - to - face conversations, listening and responding to legal blogs, forum convos and tweets — armed with that feedback we can develop the best offering to service our members.
Not exact matches
Development of the ResQu Index involved five distinct phases: 1) generating items and a weighted scoring system; 2) conducting expert content validation
via a quantitative survey and a modified Delphi process; 3)
testing inter-rater consistency; 4) assuring compatibility with established research quality checklists and 5) piloting the ResQu Index in a large systematic review to assess instrument
usability and feasibility.
The instrument development process involved five phases: 1) generation of items and a weighted scoring system; 2) content validation
via a quantitative survey and a modified Delphi process with an international, multi-disciplinary panel of experts; 3) inter-rater consistency; 4) alignment with established research appraisal tools; and 5) pilot -
testing of instrument
usability.