To ensure a
viable future for the country, the new
order would have to rest on a foundation of truly reasonable norms, about which a stable and healthy
social consensus could cohere.
Hume's assertion that our «religious phase» may have been the «inevitable» precondition or «vessel» of secular morality (it isn't clear whether he means naturally or historically inevitable) can't get the ethical humanist secularist around the more haunting question of whether the secular political project of mass ethical secularism is
viable, much less sustainable — especially if that
social order is not to be grounded in philosophy, and especially if the politics in question must, as apparently it must, be one grounded in rights to freedoms.