Since the air molecules are at the same temperature, no net exchange of molecular
vibrational energy transfer.
Teasing out how plants use light could lead to improvements in renewable energy, like designing solar materials that optimize both electronic and
vibrational energy transfer.
Not exact matches
Low temperature plasmas are one of the best media for CO2 decomposition — the split - up of the molecule into oxygen and carbon monoxide — both by direct electron impact, and by
transferring electron
energy into
vibrational excitation.»
So
energy gets lost from the
vibrational mode and
transferred into the general temperature of the surrounding gas.
If your question is how the
energy trapped by the atmosphere gets
transferred to O2, N2..., the answer is that the excited
vibrational state of CO2 is long - lived.
This
energy can then be
transferred to any other gas molecule in the atmosphere causing it to heat up (that's what heat is — the measure of molecular
vibrational energy).
Almost immediately (nanoseconds) they relax from their excited state by either 1) emitting that
energy as a new photon, some of which will continue up towards space, some of which will go back downward to be reabsorbed, thus keeping the
energy in the atmosphere longer, or 2) by colliding with another gas molecule, most likely an O2 (oxygen) or N2 (nitrogen) molecule since they make up over 98 % of the atmosphere, thereby converting the extra
vibrational energy into kinetic
energy by
transferring it to the other gas molecule, which will then collide with other molecules, and so on, making the air warmer.
At face value it requires that no
energy can be
transfered via collisions, i.e. no thermal conductivity, no viscosity, no diffusion... Even for CO2, there is no mechanism for the
transfer of
energy from rotational /
vibrational degrees of freedom to translational motion which has no coupling with a radiation field.
These observations demonstrate as expected that CO2 emits the same power as it absorbs and that there is no net
energy transfer between the
vibrational modes of CO2 and the translational modes of N2 and O2.
My main point is that my substantial physics training leads me to believe that the main impact of GHGs is
vibrational excitation followed by return to the ground state, emitting a photon of the same wavelength but in a random direction, rather than by any significant
transfer of internal
vibrational energy to thermal
energy of surrounding molecules.