A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment (in an age discrimination and
victimisation case) has shown how wide recommendations can be.
Barker v National Grid plc and Hudson Global Resources Ltd Harini successfully defended National Grid in a sensitive
victimisation case brought by a former employee who complained that the failure to shortlist her for job vacancies was because of victimisation.
Not exact matches
«Throughout the development of this report we have listened to the stories of young people who are navigating the complexities of relationships in a digital age and in some
cases are facing the worst forms of peer - to - peer
victimisation and online sexual harassment.»
After conducting advanced analysis on the data obtained, being a victim of a sexual crime was shown to be a significant predictor of juror behaviour in rape
cases, with the research revealing that jurors with personal experience of
victimisation were four times more likely to convict in court, prior to deliberations taking place.
Helen Hogben has particular experience in
cases of
victimisation and discrimination involving police forces and the NHS.
It appears that there is some judicial sympathy for litigants unable to prove their
cases owing to the operation of the «without prejudice» rule, although this appears confined to the discrimination /
victimisation field.
Anger - Kraavi v University of Cambridge Harini represented in the Employment Tribunal a senior woman academic who brought claims of
victimisation alleging that the University had not abided by the promises made in the settlement agreement for her first
case, in which she had brought claims of equal pay, sexual harassment, unfair dismissal and sex discrimination.
Recent
cases include Camurat v Thurrock Borough Council [2015] E.L.R. 1, on the inter-relationship between confidentiality in compromise agreements, duties of employers in giving references, and statutory duties to make safeguarding disclosures, Shalom v Newham College (race, religion and age discrimination, harassment,
victimisation, failure to investigate), Bilqes v Burnley College (religious discrimination).
The council must have been as pleased as punch when it succeeded in the Court of Appeal — especially when Lord Justice Mummery suggested that it was not sensible in «most
cases» of
victimisation to limit the grounds of appeal when the points raised tend to overlap.
Adult onset of major depressive disorder in relation to early life violent
victimisation: a
case - control study