While I represent victims hurt by slip and fall hazards, malfunctioning elevators and escalators, animal attacks, window falls, and inadequately maintained residences, I also represent
victims of serious injuries resulting from crimes that occur on commercial property.
Not exact matches
Lawyers won't receive any significant additional fees as a
result of the correction to the discount rate that is all about benefiting the innocent
victims of serious injuries.
Accused went to cottage
of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with
victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC —
Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a
result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining
serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted
victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim's evidence that there was some kind
of pushing — Accused convicted on one count
of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term
of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04
of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that
injuries sustained by
victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by
victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim — Having provided reasons for accepting
victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding
resulted.
Clients, whether
victims of serious injury, road traffic accidents, criminal law, industrial disease or medical negligence, receive a much better, more responsive, more flexible and faster service as a
result.
Accused went to cottage
of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with
victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was r
victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC —
Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was r
Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a
result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was r
victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining
serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted
victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was r
victim's evidence that there was some kind
of pushing — Accused convicted on one count
of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term
of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04
of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that
resulted in
serious injuries, but with no intention
of causing those
injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood
of re-offending was remote.
Accidents that
result in
serious injuries happen every day, leaving thousands
of victims injured and dealing with the
resulting medical debt, inability to work, and pain and suffering.
The accident attorneys at Chanfrau & Chanfrau are experienced in representing
victims of truck accidents
resulting in
serious damage and
injury.
For the past ten years, Wilshire Law Firm has represented thousands
of accident
victims, who have suffered
serious injuries, also as a
result from exposure to toxic chemicals and materials.
As these accidents frequently
result in
serious injuries,
victims and their families are often forced to endure a number
of physical, emotional, and financial setbacks.
Rollover accident
victims often sustain
serious injuries requiring costly medical care and
resulting in a lower quality
of life.
If your poor decisions cause someone
serious injury, or worse
result in death, you could also be responsible to the
victim's family for their loss
of support and companionship.
Trucking accidents
result in some
of the most
serious injuries and damages, and as a
result it is likely that a
victim will want to pursue a negligence claim against the culpable party.
However, Kim Harrison, principal lawyer, PI
serious injury group, Pannone part
of Slater & Gordon, says: «This
result is disappointing for the
victim herself, who needs a high level
of care and can't access criminal
injuries compensation.
In
serious injury cases
resulting in death, disability, or a
serious impairment
of bodily function, the
victims of these accidents can seek additional damages from the at - fault driver based on his or her negligence.
The causes
of personal
injury may
result from many different accidents that can cause
serious medical consequences for the
victim.
Last Update: 01/27/16 As we all know, drunk drivers cause car accidents and those car crashes often
result in
serious injuries or even death for innocent people who are the
victims of the illegally intoxicated driver.
When the careless or reckless conduct
of one party
results in
serious injuries to another, the
injury victim has the right to seek fair compensation for his or her
injuries.
If an accident does not
result in
serious injuries, it frequently
results in the fatality
of an innocent
victim.
When someone suffers catastrophic
injury,
serious and sobering
results in the lives
of these
victims ensues, such as being unable to work, facing horribly excruciating pain while attempting to heal, facing disfigurement, and other
serious ongoing physical consequences to your body.
While a motorcycle wreck is likely to have
resulted in some
serious injuries for the
victim, and they are most likely spending a lot
of time in hospital, it is important that you seek compensation for your
injuries.
The Law Offices
of Kanner & Pintaluga is an aggressive, ethical and
results - driven law firm committed to representing accident and
serious injury victims in various states.
The most
serious spinal cord
injuries result in paralysis, leaving the
victim unable to move or feel parts
of their body.
Attorney Thompson has successfully represented
victims of SUV rollovers by obtaining rollover data on the vehicles and, through the use
of experts in the field, establishing that fairly minor and inexpensive design changes could have prevented the accident and the
serious injuries that
resulted.
The purpose
of this requirement is to ensure that, in the event a motorist causes a Florida car accident
resulting in
serious injuries or death, the motorist has sufficient assets to cover the costs incurred by the accident
victim.
When an airplane crashes, the usual
result is death or
serious injury, and with each occurrence, grief visits the families and extended families
of the
victims, bringing about terrible loss and sorrow.
Unfortunately, this statistic fails to account for the thousands
of accidents involving semi-trucks or 18 - wheelers that
result in minor or
serious injuries, which can cause trauma that can still damage
victims and their families.
Because
of our experience, reputation and history
of results, we are frequently called upon to assist the
victims of serious injuries statewide and across the country.
We have obtained jury verdicts and settlements in the millions
of dollars on behalf
of personal
injury victims who suffer from
serious injuries as a
result of a property owner's failure to do so.
felony assault
resulting in
serious bodily
injury or harm, if the
victim was a child
of the parent or a child with whom the parent lived with at the time; or