In recent years, video - based observation has been taken to a high level as teacher education researchers have repurposed
the video annotation methods and tools developed for qualitative research (Rich & Hannafin, 2009), usually with the instructional goal of generating deeper self - reflection (e.g., Calandra, Brantley - Dias, Lee, & Fox, 2009; Rich & Hannafin, 2008; van Es & Sherin, 2002).
The video annotation methods developed by teacher education researchers have shown great promise for guiding sophisticated analysis of self - video by late - stage preservice teachers and in - service teachers.
The second adaptation we made to
the video annotation method was using experts» observations of the same video segments as feedback to learners.
In this exploratory study, we started with the well - researched and sophisticated activity of video annotation and then made three adaptations to
the video annotation method (near - peer video; expert feedback; video study approach) and also implemented it with early - stage rather than late - stage teacher education students.
Not exact matches
Although we created a manual prototype (see
Methods section) for research purposes, this version would ultimately require a software program similar to those used for
video annotation to operate as a self - instructional interactive
video module.
Our primary treatment consisted of the
video annotation with expert feedback
method (coding) that included teacher education students writing their
video - based observations before being shown the experts» observations.
Kucan, Palincsar, Khasnabis, and Chang (2009) used a
video annotation activity to assess teachers» knowledge about innovative reading instruction
methods taught in a workshop.