Sentences with phrase «view as anything»

Granted, it's a shift to view yourself as anything but a lawyer.

This is, after all, a film as much about the photographic point - of - view as anything else.

It is hard to view this as anything other than a one year spell.

We may as well have had a big sign saying «come f @ # k me here» on our left side, but now I highly doubt any team would view it as anything but problematic for them at both ends of the pitch.

Had your mom wanted to become a priest she would have been thrown out of the church just for trying, I'm not sure how that could be viewed as anything other than oppression.

Why should that possibility be viewed as anything other than the makings for a creation, once again, out of nothing in total violation of what God anticipates ideally for the universe?

Though this may vary from lender to lender, a bad credit score is typically viewed as anything under 600.

Something about those rocks made me think about the universe and whether it viewed me as anything more than a flimsy leaf struggling to hang on for another day.

I had played video games growing up - mostly SNES classics such as Donkey Kong Country and Super Mario World, and I absolutely KILLED at Yoshi's Island — but had never viewed them as anything other than pure brain - melting entertainment.

Given that this 2.0 C goal calculation apparently excludes the ~ doubling of warming due to the predictable loss of the «sulphate parasol», and excludes all carbon feedback outputs, it is hard to see how an additional forcing from feedback permafrost methane «comparable to what CO2 can do» can be viewed as anything but calamitous.

Why should anyone take your views as anything other than those of a politically motivated propagandist?

Not exact matches

Anything that has 200 million monthly visitors and about five billion video views is probably worth taking seriously as a media outlet.

For the purposes of advertising, Facebook counts as a view anything that lasts longer than three seconds.

The NFL rejected the ad and said the program was not a place for anything that could be viewed as a political statement.

Hegarty came out swinging against what he views as an over-reliance on data in the industry right now, saying, «I've spent my life dealing with people who've got all the data in the world and yet they can't invent anything.»

«I don't view that as a harbinger of anything, frankly.

valued as real money because they view anything else as a distraction.

The NY Times aptly reflects the consensus view that there has really been no, «rout,» in the market for junk bonds and that they don't signal anything more serious for other markets or the economy, as they don't represent a, «systemic risk.»

The act was passed hastily, viewed as a cheap way for a Congress to be seen as doing something — anything!

As Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh's put it after viewing demos, «I didn't see anything where I thought «Oh wow, I think this will change the world.»»

At this stage, we are still inclined to view this development as a cyclical recovery, rather than anything more significant.

Regardless of your beliefs and views, is it not tasteless for CNN to run this as their lead story on Easter morning??? Americans are appalled by anything done to insult Islam believers, so why is this felt to be appropriate??? There is nothing wrong with the article, but its timing makes it a poor and inflammatory choice of journalism, and would be taken as «persecution» if was directed toward any other belief system.

Nobody has all the answers to ANYTHING, that includes your athiest views as well.

The world is black and white and anything else is seen as soft... I can tell you for a fact that he is viewed positively by a large majority of scheme people who find his views odd but like the fact he sticks up for himself against the posh establishment.»

Should you desire to express your views that is your priviledge why not give me the same opportunity.It seems to me if a person does not believe the Bible as it was written long ago you would not believe anything written back them what is the date that you would start believeing something written.

Jesus» original disciples likely never thought of him as anything more than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed by God, but the idea of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their own views of what a «son of God» means into the faith.

I came to view Christian experience as suspect, holding out little possibility that it could add anything beneficial to my well - defined belief systems.

As a former community organizer, he knows that you need a little empathy all around to get anything done among people with different world views.

If christianity has taught us anything, its that your god views us as sheep and will use us as such.Luckily for your kind you can sheer a sheep many times, however like a dog, you keep going back for your next beating!

In plain English, I view myself as a person who wants to introduce Jesus to a group of people who don't know much (if anything) about Him, and as far as they are concerned, don't really care to know Him.

I don't view Jesus as anything more than an evangelical of his time.

They are NOT perfect theories, they're not even that mainstream any longer (scholars have a wide range of views, cf. Whybray's «The Making of the Pentateuch» and anything by Kitchen as an example), and there are plenty of opposing ideas.

With this view of time as contingent and negative, God's eternity could not be equated with time or have anything to do with time.

The major importance of Hartshorne's work in my view» is the way in which his dipolar panentheism indicates the possibility of a concept of God which allows believers to speak of him as an individual, personal reality and significantly to use active verbs of him — like love, create, know, respond — without denying anything that properly belongs to his ultimacy and worshipfulness and without falling into self - contradiction.

Moreover, both sides, much like the Repubs and Demos in our political system, can not view anything passed the length of our own noses if it is in contrast to the «beliefs» we hold dear to us as humans.

In other words, there is a complete paradox if we attempt to look at the ordinary physicist's view of time as anything more than an abstraction.

As to being a «conscious and honored view,» I'm sure it's conscious, but, as a woman, I find it anything but honorablAs to being a «conscious and honored view,» I'm sure it's conscious, but, as a woman, I find it anything but honorablas a woman, I find it anything but honorable.

a foreigners (Dutch) view; it would be seen as a big laugh but also a disgrace for America if Romney was elected; the Republicans never brought anything good for the USA and the rest of the world; look what Bush did; a huge deficit; a war with the wrong enemy and the Democrats had to clean up the mess again;

And there's no legitimate Bible scholar in the world who views the NIV as anything other than a watered down people's version of the BIble.

Anything other than the «correct» view of homosexuality is attributed to «homophobia,» which is consistently described as the result of bigotry, ignorance, and the fear of one's own sexuality.

None of these views should be taken as anything but a way in which the deeply felt experience of forgiveness and at - one - ment with God is known; they are «sociologically conditioned,» as it would be phrased today.

I am sorry that in the past, I condemned you and your writings as «heresy» without ever actually reading or listening to anything you wrote or said, or trying to understand your views.

Anything that is not in lock step with your limited views of freedom is expressed as a forum of suppression when actually you need to deal with the fact that you lost your white male hetro privilege in 1969.

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

it's not like they viewed atheism as a central doctrinal tenet or anything..

The trick was to view anything good happening as a result of God paying you back for tithing and just ignore or don't think about the times good things don't happen or when bad things happen.

Needless to say, in the weeks leading up to Pope Benedict XVI's recent pilgrimage to Great Britain I had little expectation that my English kin would hold anything other than a dim view of the entire affair as being another example of religion wasting money, cloggingtraffic in central London, and no doubt also harming the environment.

If there is anything that must define a progressive Christianity in the modern age, it is that you simply can't retrench to your own position, appeal on authority to your given text and let it go at that as far as seeking the truth of your own view is concerned.

The defender of asymmetry (who views a present person as internally related to his past but as externally related to his future) finds it comical to see Russell attacking rationalists like Bradley and Hegel because they had little or no use for anything but internal relations.

I don't view occurrences that happen for natural reasons as ANYTHING of God, if they're mentioned in the Bible.