So I don't think that being convinced that there is no god is as irrational or arrogant a point of
view as belief that there is.
Not exact matches
The title's not - so subtle biblical reference is a hint at Stursberg's
view of the Ceeb
as the place that business common sense forgot, and the book serves largely
as a catalogued defence of his
belief that audience numbers, not an ambiguous cultural mandate, would define the network's success.
While most sellers
view proposals
as a step that gets them closer to orders, my
belief is that proposals do not sell.
As this reaction suggests, Canadians have come to view home ownership as a right, a belief that has intensified over the past decade as we've piled into the marke
As this reaction suggests, Canadians have come to
view home ownership
as a right, a belief that has intensified over the past decade as we've piled into the marke
as a right, a
belief that has intensified over the past decade
as we've piled into the marke
as we've piled into the market.
I find it interesting that people who adhere to orthodox / fundamentalist streams of Christianity feel the need to make everyone live
as they do (regardless of their
beliefs)-- it's
as though the only way these people can come close to living in accordance with their
views is to make sure everyone else pretends to be like them in order to remove the temptation for them.
To say your purpose is to be a loving father is in error
as that is the result of a
belief or world
view (I do not know you so that is an example)
Now, please note what I'm not saying: I'm not calling for anyone to abandon their religious convictions or political affiliations, and I'm not calling for religious believers of any stripe to extricate their religious
beliefs from their political
views (
as though that were possible).
It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness
as well
as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative
views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their
beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.
Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «
beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known
as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to
view «the teachings of G - d» (the law)
as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple question..
But they try to make it look like it is about «
belief» in the sense of faith (in a deity or non faith in a deity) and
as often
as not it is about political
views (
beliefs) and elections and politicians (and nothing to do with deity).
Assumptions along these lines are what atheists hang their hats on, but assumptions lead to false reasoning, and in any case, they base their
view on
beliefs, even though they don't recognize it
as a
belief.
I am making the «
belief in no god» a concept that a Atheist (not a Agnostic Atheist) would
view as true but can not prove so their
view would fall under the definition of faith.
Let us remember that and be more respectful — let us reach out to each other with AT THE LEAST tolerance that each person will have different
views and INSTEAD of trying to degrade someone just because they refuse to adhere to your
beliefs — LISTEN to them and allow that you may feel differently but they have a RIGHT to believe or not believe
as they will.
Regardless of your
beliefs and
views, is it not tasteless for CNN to run this
as their lead story on Easter morning??? Americans are appalled by anything done to insult Islam believers, so why is this felt to be appropriate??? There is nothing wrong with the article, but its timing makes it a poor and inflammatory choice of journalism, and would be taken
as «persecution» if was directed toward any other
belief system.
so glad YOU know what god means... why don't you enlighten the rest of us becuase the bible is full of contradictions... I am going to come here everyday now to see if you can fill me in... but unless you can clear it up for me post haste, I am going to continue to
view belief in god
as silly and childish which it is and that is how I teach it... I don't say «all of you listen: god doesn't exist.»
Also, I couldn't quite get this into words
as I was writing before, so: I am believe that I am correct in my
view of Scripture
as it has been handed down to me from teachers, preachers, writers and others; I believe that I am correct in my
beliefs about who God is, and about His self - revelation, in the same way that all people believe that the opinions they hold are true.
I could care less if someone worshiped a shoe in a jar
as long
as they have the sense to keep their
beliefs out of the law and when
viewing how the law will apply to the US Citizens that they do not only look at it from their perspective
as there are many out there that have dissimilar
beliefs and do not always
view the world from the same perspective.
To me, the most effective way of doing so is pointing out the sheer absurdity of their
beliefs in public forums such
as this, so
as to weaken the underlying social support and impetus for such draconian
views.
so how can you expect to look at them
as human if your only
view of them is through their
belief?
Atheists (not all just
as not all christians preach) that try to spread their
beliefs to others do so with similar ideas of helping people free themselves from they
view as mentally oppressive.
Your
belief is flawed and contradictory
as I have noted you agree with William Provine @ Cornel University: «He says, «Let me summarize my
views on what modern evolutionary biology tells us loud and clear.»
This is not surprising in itself, of course; what Roof and McKinney regard
as significant is the fact that religious communities are increasingly distinguished not by theological
beliefs but by «contrasting ethical styles and moral
views.»
In
view of the cogency and desirability of the goals expressed in ECE, and
as a demonstration of our
belief that all Catholics, in Cardinal George's words, are «both invisibly (spiritually) and visibly (socially and juridically) related to our brothers and sisters in Christ around the world,» it is appropriate to rely on bishops for apostolic governance.
Trust me, I can understand logically how Atheist
view God or Gods
as being the same
as Santa Claus but in the end the statement of non-
belief is just
as wide of a gorge
as belief.
He moves from a
belief central in Western monotheism, that God acts in history, to claim that American foreign policy can — and should — be
viewed as an instrument God uses to realize God's ultimate plan.
I know Christ followers who
view the «say the sinner's prayer and get saved» version / understanding of the Gospel (and the mindset the usually goes with that set of
beliefs)
as a strange perversion of the Gospel.
(For the record, Bell describes his current theological
views as agnostic - somewhere between
belief and atheism.
Salvation by God's grace alone through faith in Christ alone
as revealed in Scripture alone is unlike any other
belief or world
view.
• Traditional liberals, writes our friend Robert P. George, have promoted their
views as a way that people holding conflicting comprehensive doctrines» «an integrated set of
beliefs about the human good, human dignity, and human destiny»» can live together.
The media hounded Tim Farron for his Christian
views; they did not regard it
as acceptable for him to hold
views other than those of the political elite, or the majority, Similarly, our
belief in the personhood of the unborn child and the sanctity of their lives enables us to see abortion
as a sin crying to heaven for justice, not merely some privately held opinion; for us it is most definitely not «a woman's choice».
I came to
view Christian experience
as suspect, holding out little possibility that it could add anything beneficial to my well - defined
belief systems.
If we
view schools
as antithetical to our
beliefs, it's likely harder to get motivated to improve those same schools.
In the first draft of Catholicism, now published thanks to Fr Nesbitt
as Matter and Mind, we find a fuller discussion than Catholicism offers of Fr Holloway's
view of this philosophical movement and its challenge to Christian
belief.
Theology in the Reformation tradition has explored other alternatives,
as in the «Andover theory» which
views biblical texts such
as 2 Peter 3:19 «20 and 4:6 and Christ's descent to the dead referenced in the Apostles» Creed
as warranting
belief in the Hound of Heaven pursuing the last and the least.
Since the
belief system of a parish includes not only its formal creeds but also the meanings it assigns to itself and its members
as finite bodies, to learn about a church's world
view — what it believes is really going on in life — one must listen to the church's stories about its own body and those of the members who constitute it.
I am guessing that people like you usually
view any reaction that is contrary to your
beliefs,
as «knee jerk».
Christians in Rome were
viewed as a threat to the Emperor (Roman Emperors, by the way, were not atheists, they tended to have Pagan
beliefs — recall the Roman gods).
But what resulted from this state of affairs was a false
view of reason
as being totally opposed to
belief, and of the natural world
as being outside the realm of
belief.
The willingness to classify political
views which should be respected, such
as leaving or staying in the EU,
as «extreme», shows the danger of focusing the extremism debate on
beliefs we may find uncomfortable or disagree with, rather than on actions that threaten lives.»
Unfortunately, to echo in advance another regular of this forum, there's a real gravity in taking on some
beliefs like, say,
viewing Jesus
as the Messiah.
It is possible now, if we
view reality
as evolutionary, to situate
belief in the world.
If religious
belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended
as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world -
view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist,
as normative for their entire lives and
as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken
as a means but
as an end, belong to the religious dimension.
[10] «ln our
view there is an important difference between this factual information being imparted in a descriptive way
as part of a wide - ranging syllabus about different religions, and a curriculum which teaches a particular religion's doctrinal
beliefs as if they were objectively true.»
The 1938 report Doctrine in the Church of England says that «every individual ought to test his or her
belief in practice and, so far
as his or her ability and training allow, to think out his or her own
belief and to distinguish between what has been accepted on authority only and what has been appropriated in thought or experience».23 Such an emphasis has to allow for variety of
belief and
view within the community.
The Bible can't be used to verify claims any more than the Quran or the Book of Mormon,
as all religious texts first require a basic
belief on the part of the reader that they (the texts) are right in order to be
viewed as such.
For example, if one understood by the church simply the historically given communities with their multiplicity of
beliefs and practices, the
view of theology
as the articulation of the church's faith would lead to a plurality of theologies that could hardly escape the recognition of their relativity with respect to historical factors.
Hindutva's defenders insist that, although reflective of Hindu
belief and practice, theirs is in fact a broader «cultural» or «civilizational» ideology and should be
viewed alongside other ideologies such
as socialism and communism.
Similarly, a
belief in subsitutionary atonement, or other
views of Jesus
as the divine sacrifice for our salvation would be unusual, and technically not in keeping with our Universalist heritage.
What I do want for them is a place / church to experience other Christians
as the world is filled with other
views and
beliefs... it is nice to be around others who share a love for Jesus and want to serve him and are willing to walk the walk and take on battle scars to serve him in whatever way that shapes up for that individual.
He takes particular issue with doctrines ratified by popes down the centuries, such
as the immaculate conception (the
belief that Mary was born free from original sin) which, in his
view, have no basis in scripture.