Not exact matches
This human
point of view calls for further elaboration, for one often sees
reference to the cultural and historical conditionedness
of Scripture
as though it were a cause for concern.
All theories which place «a subject,»
as a fixed
point of reference and a well determined entity, ahead
of the process
of experience have, in Whitehead's
view, not clearly understood subjectivity.
Wexboy,
Reference your 30th Sept current summary in KR1, From my
point of view I am in awe
of your 2 % holding in KR1, The figures are very compelling and staggering in forward potential, I might have this projection all wrong but here goes,
As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO,
As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO,
As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp
of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value
of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back
of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and
as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO,
as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO,
as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector
of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC
of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP
AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO,
AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO,
AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, s?
The reviews provide various
points of view on titles and we hope that these scores correctly represent the games we play, we take the scores seriously
as well hoping they provide
reference for gamers looking to play them.
Appearing
as an exponent
of the Neo-Expressionism when the painting was considered to be overdated medium, Kiefer brought the innovative
point of view by using the materials partially borrowed from Robert Rauschenberg's combines and unconventionality
of Art Brut and Arte Povera in a combination with symbolism and mysticism, deeply imbued with historical
references.
MC: I swallow everything I see
as a linguistic experience, my
references are not people but rather all the concepts every experience gives from a formal and conceptual
point of view.
Phillipson's recent exhibition at Zabludowicz Collection, through the flesh - tone scenario, the imported combi - boudoir (2013), saw the artist create a multi-layered installation that investigated the relationship between virtual and tactile spaces through cultural
references as diverse
as point -
of -
view «selfies», experimental architecture, supermarkets, museums and pop videos.
Since it has no
reference to objects that exist, or to ideal objects, such
as circles and squares, his work must be considered from the
point of view of expression through the integration
of rhythm, color and design, which he feels beauty is composed
of.
Dead Lands suggests a
view of the land
as a
point of reference, a beginning or an end.
Using aerial
views of prison complexes
as a
point of reference, she extracts colors (blues in particular), demarcation lines, and other fragments that touch on the experience
of visiting her father in various prisons over the past 19 years.
Once a year Sutton Lane organises an exhibition which serves
as critical
reference for the contemporary programme
of the gallery and which informs the practice
of its artists from a historical
point of view:
Referencing to McIntyre's opinion blog ClimateAudit
as supposedly authorative source for your claims is just ridiculous from my
point of view.
As Justice Ferguson scathingly noted in a judgment where lawyers for both parties had failed to do adequate research for the case: «In my
view, it is not acceptable for any counsel or articling student to come to court intending to argue a contentious
point of law without first researching the
point at least to the extent
of looking up the issue in basic
reference books... If the lack
of preparation and research in this case were unique or unusual I would let it pass, however, unfortunately it is not.
Personally, I don't think there's much to worry about here: I don't
view blogs
as advertising, and
referencing an accident to explain a
point of law would fall within an educational, non-financially motivated exception to the rules.
Under the terms
of reference of the working group, it will examine how technical advancements, particularly wearable and portable devices may be treated from the
point of view of risk improvement, risk assessment and use
of such devices
as part
of policy design.