While writing your informative essays you have to remember that your task is just to inform the readers objectively about some matter, without evaluating it or without inserting your own point of
view at the subject.
Not exact matches
Such statements are based on management's current
views and assumptions that could ultimately prove inaccurate and are
subject to risk factors such as (but not limited to) changes in raw materials prices, currency fluctuations, the pace
at which cost - reduction projects are implemented and changes in general economic and financial conditions.
He went on: «While we may always have a different point of
view about what happened
at the end of our relationship, the founding of the company is a matter of record and not
subject to «personal perspectives.»
The new plans are
subject to several limits, including all streaming video must be
viewed at DVD - quality — not in higher resolutions — and customers that use more than 26 GB per line in a month could see their data rates cut to slow speeds.
Munger, 93, is chairman and a director
at Daily Journal, a Los Angeles - area publishing company, and his appearance
at its annual meeting is a chance to hear his
views on a wide range of
subjects.
It's not clear yet whether others in the cryptocurrency industry — or tech
at large — share Powell's
views, but I'd love to hear your opinions on this
subject: DM me on Twitter @jenwieczner or email me
at [email protected]
-
At the same time, both Iran and Iraq must make sacrifices for Saudi Arabia to accept the deal, Iran takes opposite
view, insisting Saudi should cut more, as it boosted output most in recent years: oil producers that raised output in past years while Iran was
subject to sanctions «will have to shoulder a bigger share of the output drop and accept more responsibility»: oil minister Bijan Zanganeh
One of his
views that always stuck with me on that
subject,
at least as a starting point for thinking about it, was that it was somewhat nonsensical to talk about what «equilibrium exchange rates» should be in a world of fiat currencies and fractional reserve banking.
Any
views are
subject to change
at any time based on market or other conditions, and Miller Value Partners disclaims any responsibility to update such
views.
Such
views are
subject to change
at any point and Sapphire Ventures shall not be obligated to provide notice of any change.
Any such
views are
subject to change
at any time based on market or other conditions.
The discussion of the investment strategy of The Oakmark Funds represents the
views of the portfolio managers and Harris Associates L.P.
at the time of this material and are
subject to change without notice.
Any
views expressed are
subject to change
at any time, and Miller Value Partners disclaims any responsibility to update such
views.
The problem is this
subject is
viewed (to the extent it is
viewed at all) as shifting shades of gray by a public that generally doesn't care how financial professionals are regulated.
The
views expressed in this commentary are those of Erik Weisman and are
subject to change
at any time.
The
views expressed are those of the James Swanson and are
subject to change
at any time.
The
views expressed are those of the author (S) and are
subject to change
at any time.
That, of course, is not the prevailing
view at most business schools, whose finance curriculum tends to be dominated by such
subjects.
The
views expressed are those of David Cole and are
subject to change
at any time.
Opinions will always differ on such a
subject, but
at the moment there are probably more, including some influential offshore institutions, inclining to the opposite
view.
The discussion of the Fund's investments and investment strategy (including current investment themes, the portfolio managers» research and investment process, and portfolio characteristics) represents the Fund's investments and the
views of the portfolio managers and Harris Associates L.P., the Fund's investment adviser,
at the time of this letter, and are
subject to change without notice.
The
views expressed are those of James Swanson and are
subject to change
at any time.
Views and opinions are
subject to change
at any time based on market and other conditions.
If you have
view at all about any
subject you have a belief about that
subject.
The variety of persons and
views engaged, I confidently expect, is far greater than what might be found
at a Jesuit seminary in Berkeley where academics churn out reviews unhindered by acquaintance with their
subject.
Instead, it is the sort of complex secret that reposes in plain
view, an abiding condition that can only be seen, if
at all, by standing still and looking, until the pattern emerges and makes meaningful the life of the
subject.
The point about all these pontifications, I thought
at the time, whether over the airwaves or in the print media, either by secular commentators or by the kind of Catholics the liberal media like to give a platform to because their
views on the Catholic tradition are so similar to their own (it seemed by the beginning of the conclave that it had all been going on for ever) was — or so I reflected then in my simple way — that this wonderful free - for - all was the only chance for many of them to be heard
at all on this
subject.
In the first place it can be taken as axiomatic in the Catholic
view of faith that where the Church's magisterium has once unambiguously required
at any time an absolute, ultimate and unconditional assent of faith to a definite doctrine as revealed by God, the doctrine in question is no longer
subject to revision and is irrevocable.
This
view,
at any rate, is the only one compatible with saying, as Whitehead does say, that an entity which is actual, is actual regardless of whether its present existence is that of a
subject enjoying the universe from which it arises or that of a superject functioning objectively in subsequent processes.
The first and most evident outcome of this
view of the matter is the singular extent to which it co-ordinates and unifies such ideas as we have been able to arrive
at on the
subject of life in general.
In that
view the human
subject was
at the heart of all intellection.
From Chris, and the community
at rethinkinghell.com: Proponents of the eternal conscious torment
view typically hold to the biblical teaching that the unsaved are likewise resurrected and that both body and soul are
subject to hell.
All holy book scriptures have been
subjected to the
views of given authors — which is no different than a modern - day biography — and,
at best, should be used to guide one's decisions — much like a fable written for children.
He dedicated his writings to the
subject of man although he was a number of years arriving
at his full
view.
Consequently as regards the fundamental contention we are examining, it is not appropriate, in
view of the historical associations that burden the word «material» to subsume under the term «matter» the subjectivity which is also met with within the primordial unity we have described, because to do so would
at least obscure the equally fundamental difference encountered in that unity between the knowing
subject and the object which is merely met with.
However much it consumes our attention
at the moment, The Da Vinci Code is a sand castle on the beach, one that will soon erode and melt from
view,
subjected to the waves of information and stimulation that ceaselessly beat the shores of our hypermediated culture.
I have been the
subject of gossip
at churches I don't even attend, and
at times my
views have been so grossly misrepresented I'm not entirely sure how the rumors even started.
This grand vision in turn required not only that Whitehead's original line of thought, unredacted by Hartshorne, Christian, Leclerc and Cobb, be recovered (a task Lewis shared with Jorge Nobo), but also that the problems that Whitehead faced, as Whitehead envisioned them, and his various attempts
at solution (ending presumably in the
views published and taken by most of us as the last word on the
subject) be likewise exposed and rethought.
Actually, I don't
view success
at the Box Office as «the» measure for «Truth,» rather, as an indicator of people's high interest in the
subject matter, hence spirituality.
Since his
views are
subject to clarification and modification in future volumes, one can only speak tentatively
at this point.
This claim is frequently presented, whether implicitly or explicitly, as a correlative to the idea that Christianity often as personified by Jesus or less frequently by Paul - was «goad» for women, paid them particular attention, or
at least offered them opportunities not otherwise available, to caricature, the ideal of «the Feminist Jesus».60 In an admirable and scholarly article Leonard Swidler has marshaled historical evidences to show convincingly that Jesus was a Feminist.61 The politics of such a
view is self - evident, for much study of the
subject has developed within a context where women were struggling to establish a proper role for themselves within the contemporary church; to this end they have sought an egalitarian past to act as model for present polity.62
This perspective had been sharpened by a year's study
at Berlin, but it is striking that his interests
at that time were such that he did not attend any lectures in theology, even those of Harnack.5 Although he developed great appreciation for Harnack in later years, he worked out his own approach to Biblical scholarship by applying to the scriptures methods developed with other
subject matters in
view.
In this essay, I have referred only to the book of Genesis and thus have chosen not to mention the prohibitions against homosexuality included in Leviticus, for it seems to me that what is
at stake now is not homosexuality, which is a fact, a reality, whatever my
view of it as a rabbi might be, but the risk of irreversibly scrambling genealogies, questions of legal and social status (the child - as -
subject becoming child - as - object), and identities — a confusion that would be harmful to society as a whole and that would lose sight of the general interest in seeking the advantage of a tiny minority.
Post-modernism, for all its powerful puncturing of the messianic rationalist conceit, has the same deracinated
view of the human
subject at its heart.
I would be very interested to hear your
views on the
subject of sweeteners, in particular whether you recommend using them
at all (as they all definitely have an impact on blood glucose levels) and if they are being used, which are «best» from your perspective.
I assume that Douglas's tongue was firmly planted in his cheek when he wrote this assessment, but his comment hints
at a wide range of opinion about the
subject, from those people who believe, like cookbook author Manju Shivraj Singh, that «the tongue becomes a slave to the flavor of curry — it is an addiction,» to critics who
view curry as an insipid yellow powder that is turned into a floury, yellow cream sauce.
All
views are welcome in forums like these, but
at least have some grasp of the
subject matter.
It could be useful, to get a clearer idea on fan's
views, Regarding different
subjects and
at the end of each voting, it gives you an extra article to write about.
She helps out
at school by tutoring other students in various
subjects, and is
viewed by her peers as a leader and a supportive person who is willing to help people out
at the expense of her own studying.
Only a select few
at Aston Villa Football Club know and, like many journalists, I can only offer my own
views and opinions on the
subject.