Sentences with phrase «view cases on»

Fortunately, most insurance companies today view cases on an individual basis.

We just view cases on their own merit, no matter what side they come from.

This is because the supported notifications for the Dot View case on the original One (M8) are limited to HTC - made applications only.

The double - tap - to - wake feature works the same as it does on the Android model, and there is support for wake up and sleep with HTC's Dot View case on the Windows model (notifications and other Dot View features are not yet supported).

Not exact matches

Prosecutors in capital cases often use these to dismiss jurors because of their views on the death penalty.

From a purely financial point of view, there may have been companies and investors who were willing to buy a stake in Gawker before Peter Thiel's involvement became public on the assumption that it might win the Hogan case on appeal or that damages might be reduced.

It can be easy to view business trips as «cheat days» and allow yourself to slack on your regular fitness regimen and diet, but in most cases, you will be more productive on your business trip if you find a way to be active.

YouTube says it quickly removes videos and channels that are found to be inappropriate, and that the videos in this case averaged just over 100 views on YouTube Kids.

Case in pont: The Honest Company sends out different email types depending on what people viewed on their site.

The source of anger in each case was a conflict (orchestrated by Bushman's research team) with someone who vehemently disagreed with the student's views on abortion.

Such is the case with Gen Z teens and their views on homeownership.

If anything similar is the case at the Samsung factories, this implies that stricter limits on overtime would indeed be a bad thing, at least from the workers» point of view.

Their main economic case relies on these people and their views are not independent or believable.»

To wit: an empty slot in a drink case; two halves of a Pepsi logo that didn't align perfectly; stickers on a cooler door that impede the view of a logo inside; the fact that two brands of pretzels, Stacy's and Rold Gold, are placed next to each other despite being marketed to very different customers.

The case hinges on questions of who owns a piece of data and the circumstances under which the information can be viewed as residing in the public domain, accessible by all and sundry.

Current views on whether an asset is a security tends to follow the «Howey Test,» which comes from a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case.

As is often the case, Trump's views on the matter are somewhat difficult to parse because he speaks in sentence fragments, switching from thought to thought without completing one before moving on.

«Senator, in retrospect I think we clearly view it as a mistake that we didn't inform people, and we did that based on false information that we thought that the case was closed and that the data had been deleted.»

Lefcourt said that the way the judge who handles Shkreli's criminal case views his public conduct could affect the judge's decision on pretrial motions and arguments, which in turn can affect Shkreli's chances of beating the charges.

While this move will likely cause some anxiety, we view the chances of a significant inflation overshoot relative to target as low and think that the Federal Reserve can and will stay on a gradual rate hike path (our base case).

Investors tend to view dovish monetary policy actions favorably — and that certainly was the case last week as the global equity markets rallied on the ECB news.

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

At this point, Calacanis made his own view known, which was that the first company or project based around a new technology — in this case Bitcoin — usually becomes a lesson on how not to evolve.

My view is that even if the Fed does not, by December, have the same case for raising rates as the recent employment report seems to provide, the Fed should in any event immediately discontinue reinvesting principal as assets on the Fed's balance sheet mature.

Rick provides his take on the Fed's most recent rate hike and makes the case against an overly rigid view of price change.

U.S. government policy has a big impact on the sector, and the current administration makes a good upside case, in our view.

@HotAirAce For those that do not want religion forced down their throat (even though I don't even remotely believe that to be the case), certainly have no problem trying to force their views on others and try to deny them them pursuit of their beliefs.

Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY possibility of hell at all.

Assumptions along these lines are what atheists hang their hats on, but assumptions lead to false reasoning, and in any case, they base their view on beliefs, even though they don't recognize it as a belief.

All the nonsense about marrying one's pets is an absurd diversionary tactic that I can only assume you engage in because you can not win an honest discussion on the ethics of the issue and / or the scriptural case for your view.

The High Court is hearing the case of Felix Ngole, a Christian student who was expelled from university for expressing his Christian views on same - sex marriage on Facebook.

You said, «I have ALWAYS promoted having a church that operated on God's principles...» And you ask oldadam for» the scriptural case for your view.»

Gorsuch would not talk about his personal views on abortion or the case, but would only say that the case is now a precedent.

In the case of metaphysics, at least, Hartshorne's reliance and insistence on falsification appears to be a consequence of his view that the truth of metaphysical statements is a function of their meaning: «Metaphysical statements are not opposed to anything except wrong ways of talking.

Reverend Peter Ould who lost a still - born baby, gives his view on the tragic case of Alfie Evans - the 23 - month - old at the heart of a legal battle... More

In any case, when Shaull resumes a theological point of view he rediscovers in a theology the theses mentioned above: Christianity is revolutionary, it deconsecrates, it orients us toward a future that is always to be created, messianism must not be forgotten on earth, and the kingdom of God is a dynamic reality which judges the social order.

And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).

«I observe with particular pleasure the view you have taken of the immunity of Religion from civil jurisdiction, in every case where it does not trespass on private rights or the public peace.

The court expressed «no view on the merits of the cases» and pointed out that it did not decide whether «religious exercises has been substantially burdened, whether the government has a compelling interest, or whether the current regulations are the least restrictive means of serving that interest.»

It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving in the military had absolutely no bearing on the case and should not have even been brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.

We rightly view these as the crimes of individuals, even though they were clearly, in most cases, acting on behalf of the state of Israel.

From Origen's hope that salvation will eventually be received by all, to Karl Rahner's assertion that other religions can serve as pointers to Christ, to Clark Pinnock's biblical case for a more optimistic view of salvation, I've found that tucked away in the dusty corners of Christian libraries is a wealth of scholarship on the subject.

I thought straight away this is a joke as scriptures tell us only the father knows the time of his sons return and hes keeping it to himself he hasnt even told his son yet.Mark 13:32 This a mystery isnt God all knowing and isnt Jesus God it is a mystery.Yet I like that that is the case because it proves that the father is not the son and the son is not the father they are separate yet they are one just like the holy spirit.I have come across denominations that believe the father son and holy spirit are the one person i asked them how they can say that when Jesus was baptized we see 3 separate persons.We have enough information to know that we are in the last days the signs are present and increasing.Ever since Israel became a nation the countdown has begun.The verse the enemy will come like a thief in the night i have heard preached many times and i believe the preachers have got it wrong because they preach it from the view for the church to get there act together or you will miss out.This view is incorrect because if you are a born again believer following him in obedience and relying on the holy spirit you are not walking in darkness but are walking in the light so you will not be caught unaware as those who are sleeping this is a warning for those who are sleeping or walking according to the flesh they are in darkness.Remember the 10 wise virgins the ones who were alert and keep refilling there lamps went in with the bride those who slept were left behind and so it will be when the Lord returns.Now is the time to prepare our hearts and lives to be ready for his return.It is an exciting time to be living and we are to live in the expectation that the Lord could return at any time brentnz

On the other hand, they have not made the case for viewing suffering, rather than death, as the last enemy.

Augustine's views on these matters are not clear, but in De Libero Arbitrio he offers one of the first versions of the Free Will Defense and in some passages seems to suggest that it is not within the power of God to cause it to be the case that someone freely performs an action.

Finally, in Chapter VII the Charter gave the Security Council the power to authorize force in cases of threats to international peace and security, without clearly defining what such threats might look like and without taking account of the fact that the states who are members of the Security Council at any given time might have different views on this matter because of their own perception of their national interests.

Parkman, like Foote, wrote history from a point of view: in Parkman's case, the Whiggish conviction that, when Wolfe defeated Montcalm on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, North America was won for liberty against popish authoritarianism.

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they they base their beliefs on.

In either case we would have to deal with the religious aspects of Heidegger's Nazism on their own terms: what are those religious views?

He needs our view on salvation, wrath, and eternal rewards, and our case might be strengthened with his view of justification, while avoiding the mistakes he makes about works following faith... though really, his point about works is that they follow faith in the Holy Spirit... which is different, and which I could probably agree with.