Scariest of all, under Pinter v. Dahl, 486 U.S. 622, 647 (1988), the litigation finance company might even be
viewed as a «seller» for purposes of the rescission
remedy if it «solicit [ed] the purchase, motivated at least in part by a desire to serve his own
financial interests or those of the securities owner,» and thus the company, along with the claimant, could be on the hook to fellow investors.