Sentences with phrase «view matters from»

We will help you to think more commercially and view matters from a law firm's and client's perspective.

However, most of them, as Christians, understand that they should view matters from the point of view of the masses of the people.

Viewing matters from inside either of these two communities of discourse, it is hard to see a way beyond this impasse.

Nevertheless, viewing matters from a Christian perspective allows in principle, and to some extent in fact, for a wider context in which the relations of economics and ecology can be rethought.

Or do we say that one perspective views the matter from the point of view of Gods sovereignty (where everything that happens, including Satans activity is ultimately from God, in that he permits it) and the other from the point of view of Gods Love (from which evil is contrary to his will).

We find that this approach allows us to view a matter from both sides of the coin, which helps us and our clients see things a little bit differently than how our competitors may view the issue.

Not exact matches

Gone are the days when executives would shy away from sharing their views on matters that had little to do with their company's day - to - day activities.

«It will be an important occasion for them (Modi and Xi) to exchange views on bilateral and international matters, from an overarching and long - term perspective with the objective of enhancing mutual communication,» Swaraj said.

In Blank's view, this is far from government meddling in matters best left to the private market.

No matter if it is hardware (which many rumors are pointing to), a replacement UI for existing devices (which makes sense from a data capture point of view), an enhanced app (after all they are constantly iterating their mobile code base), or a mixture of all three, the key factor for Facebook here is to capture as much data as possible on Facebook users» mobile habits.

And from a fairly standard view about the purpose of the corporation, the wishes of shareholders matter a great deal.

As is often the case, Trump's views on the matter are somewhat difficult to parse because he speaks in sentence fragments, switching from thought to thought without completing one before moving on.

A few days later, while arguing that his personal feelings on the matter should not affect the ultimate decision to accept or reject the proposal, he stated, «from my [point of view] it seems that the community's feeling on this issue isalready [sic] clear.»

Widely available information from commercial data brokers provided people's names, addresses, shopping habits and more, but failed to distinguish on more fine - grained matters of personality that might affect political views.

We believe that decentralised digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum will fundamentally change how the world views and uses money: cheaper, faster and safer transactions; more privacy and freedom; a significantly better user experience; and ultimately, more equality through giving everyone in the world access to the same financial system, no matter who they are or where they are from.

These are the debates that are likely to matter, that are likely to be settled (or significantly advanced) in the coming year and take a view that differs meaningfully from the current market consensus.

Corporations are legally separate from their shareholders so it doesn't matter when an individual dies, it's not a taxable event from the point of view of the corporation and if there are undistributed profits those profits will remain untaxed.

It also extends to being aware of industry trends, seeking referrals from clients and co-workers, and working every day towards being viewed as a subject matter expert in a given field.

From the point of view of the banks, it does not matter how exactly they leverage their reserves.

from a bystander, but that you don't actually feel comfortable with your own views on the matter.

On that basis, I find it pretty rich when people talk about the traditional view on this matter as stemming from prejudice or ignorance of how people feel.

Catherine Roberts asks me, as a matter of my vocation as a teacher of religion, to view animals from a theocentric, not anthropocentric, perspective.

Or, for that matter, from some medieval village view.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

No matter what you believe, it is hard to walk away from viewing Mel Gibson's highly publicized and somewhat controversial adaptation of the story that makes up the foundation for...

Islam is however like most Abrahamic religions extremely violent in nature and to make matters worse unlike Judaism or Christianity has not been pushed aside from the major public view by science and technology.

It matters not so much HOW the universe was created (although the first version creation in Genesis is interestingly similar in some ways to the modern scientific view, going from light — the big bang — to simple then more increasingly complex life, but I digress) what matter is that it was created by a loving God.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

I myself seek validation from people on so many levels, e.g. personal relations, job performance, personal views on matters at hand, etc..

But in the Gnostic view the extremist reactions from the disorienting complexities of our condition are only the means the Demiurge employs to enlarge his domain in which the entertainments of abundance beguilingly promise a triumph over matter and time.

What I've gathered from past and present exchanges is that no matter what the evidence may indicate, you have made up your mind and will not consider anything that contradicts your world - view.

Steven thanks for your testimony I agree with your view that homosexuality is not an orientation we are not born that way but its a choice.We can choose to live by what our flesh dictates or we can live by what God reveals through his word and by his holy spirit.If we are serious about following God we chose to follow him so it does nt matter whether gay or straight our choice is to follow God with all our heart.I have never been gay but have battled and was overcome by my fleshly desires not until i turned from them and asked the holy spirit to help me have i been changed for that i will always be grateful to the Lord.So in that sense we are no different our testimonys are important and are powerful.Thank you for your witness and may the Lord continue to use you as his vessel to touch lives and hearts for him.brentnz

And as we noted earlier, some «materialist» thinkers are prepared to include spiritual phenomena within their definition of matter in order to maintain their materialist stanceand exclude transcendence from their world view.

But if the general subject matter of the novels is demonstrably congruent with Mantel's past, why does she tell the stories from Cromwell's point of view?

In view of the central importance of this doctrine it matters less whether it is readily accepted by our contemporaries, provided that its message is not interpreted in a narrow, selfishly individualistic sense, but that the gracious divine act which opens man to God is from the beginning understood also as creating authentic community among men.

When I talk to my good friend who is a very conservative Catholic who views taking communion as sacred and every crumb is representative of Christ's body and not one crumb will drop... then compare it to how we do it at church... everyone ripping bread from the same loaf, crumbs everywhere, kids spilling the «wine»... does it really matter... is one more right than the other... one upholds church law on how communion will be performed versus our laid back version.

When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, it was not just to see if Abraham was faithful enough to follow his commandment, it was also symbolic of the sacrifice God himself would make in sacrifice his beloved and begotten son, but unlike Abraham who was spared at the last moment from carrying through with the sacrifice of his son, God the father actually carried through with the sacrifice and although it wasn't permanent it still did not mean that there was no anguish, it doesn't matter how brief it was, if it was enough for divine and eternal beings to have to go through such heartache, all of which for our lowly sakes, in my view that is quite significant and I believe that such suffering is actually beyond mine or anyone else's comprehension.

I can not settle the question here beyond all dispute, but my view of the matter is that Hartshorne's approach is actually an enlargement and corrective which personalism needed55 — that it saves personalism from tendencies which would lead it towards the reification of personality at one extreme, or a sort of solipsism which implies impersonalism at the other.

Viewed from the perspective of the taught (rather than from the authority of the teacher), teaching is much more a matter of having one's eyes opened to dimensions of reality previously opaque.

When we contemplate the natural world from the point of view of its creation, it appears to be the deployment of a divine plan in which matter is endowed with a natural dyna mism whose successive deployment and integrations produce an immense variety of systems and processes that make possible the appearance of the human being.

Whitehead's philosophy, of course, differs in many important respects from the Aristotelian view, as is to be expected in a philosophy that takes activity rather than matter as fundamental.

If I have found anything from posting this question, its that it doesn't matter if your religious or anti-religious, people are always defensive about their views (not enough open - mindedness or politeness for that matter).

«I have no doubt that some Christian leaders have felt restrained from expressing their views on this matter for fear of being labelled homophobic or bigoted,» says Rev Ian Coffey, vice principal (strategy) and director of leadership training at Moorlands College and a regular speaker at Keswick and Spring Harvest.

Here we have the interesting notion fairly and squarely presented to us, of there being elements of the universe which may make no rational whole in conjunction with the other elements, and which, from the point of view of any system which those other elements make up, can only be considered so much irrelevance and accident — so much «dirt,» as it were, and matter out of place.

Now we may be looking at different problems here, or have different considerations in mind; but from where I view the matter, Bultmann's own statements seem to evade the crucial aspect of change in scientific thinking affecting the vision of our world; and his position, as amplified by Ogden's comments, seems to me simply not to square with the facts, as one may glean them from hearing scientists talk among themselves.

And prayer in schools is a matter of secularism which is something we all should embrace as it keeps us safe from someone else's religious view being foisted on us.

In Descartes» day, nature was held to be composed of inert stuff with force viewed as something external to that stuff, something mechanically applied to dead bits of matter from the outside.

For Revelation in the ultimate resort and in principle claims the whole of reality as the possible subject - matter of its affirmations, even if only sub respectu salutis (in relation to salvation), and from this point of view even events and realities which are accessible to secular experience fall within its material scope.

From the ontological point of view, therefore, it is simply and recognizably false to conceive the passing into act of the agent as at bottom the positing of a duplicate and then to assert that no metaphysical problem arises because the agent is only doing what itself is, so that the effect is as obviously a matter of course as the agent.

From a Christian point of view, therefore, spirit, at least finite spirit, can never be thought of in such a way that in order to attain perfection it must move away from material reality, or that its perfection increases in proportion to its distance from matFrom a Christian point of view, therefore, spirit, at least finite spirit, can never be thought of in such a way that in order to attain perfection it must move away from material reality, or that its perfection increases in proportion to its distance from matfrom material reality, or that its perfection increases in proportion to its distance from matfrom matter.