Sentences with phrase «view of an author -lsb-»

The central bank says positions presented in its staff papers solely represent the views of the author and may differ from those of the bank.

These articles will represent a broad investment spectrum, and are the views of the author.

These articles will represent a broad investment spectrum, and are the views of the author; therefore they should not be construed as archerETF investment recommendations.

Note: The opinions expressed in this article are the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of Caphyon, its staff, or its partners.

The content and articles on this are from the views of the author (s) and should not be considered financial advice.

Tocqueville Gold Monitor [PDF] John Hathaway Senior Portfolio Manager © Tocqueville Asset Management L.P. October 12, 2015 This article reflects the views of the author as of the date or dates cited and may change at any time.

In the view of the author of Matthew, Jesus certainly would have passed such a test: «The Son of man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.»

As we approach next week, here's a quote that is worth noting and following - see if you agree, and if you don't it'll maybe shake your view of the author...

In view of the author's standing in the intellectual culture that she criticizes, the book should precipitate a lively and better «informed discussion of the culture war in which, like it or not, we are all embroiled.

I find that my own students are more than merely surprised to learn about the views of the author of the Declaration of Independence as well as the Great Emancipator.

They are called «parables» or «point of view of the author» or «poetic and literary license» or «cultural accommodation» or «figures of speech» or «prophetic imagery» or whatever the preferred terminology might be.

A review that does not honestly deal with the substance of a book but only with the perceived political and / or psychological point of view of the author is a poor review.

You acknowledge that any of the user - generated content posted or transmitted through GrapeConnect represents the views of the author, and not of GrapeConnect.

This line was added in the editing process and does not reflect the views of the author.

Everyone should post how they disagree with this article, so that we can show the righteous gentiles that we are pro-morality, and that the views of this author DO NOT REPRESENT US IN ANY WAY!!!!!!!!!

Note: this post represents the views of the authors and not those of Democratic Audit or the LSE.

Note: This article was originally published on the PSA's Insight blog and gives the views of the author Oxford's Department of Politics and International Relations.

It represents the views of the authors and not those of Democratic Audit UK or the LSE.

«This post represents the views of the author — not those of Democratic Audit UK.»

It represents the views of the author only, and not those of Democratic Audit UK, the LSE Public Policy Group, or the LSE.

Note: this article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the Crick Centre, or the Understanding Politics blog series.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of Democratic Audit.

It represents the views of the author and not those of Democratic Audit or the LSE.

Notes: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the Democratic Audit UK blog, nor of the London School of Economics.

Note: This post represents the views of the author and does not necessarily give the position of Democratic Audit or the LSE.

It represents the views of the author and does not give the position of Democratic Audit or the LSE.

This post represents the views of the authors and not those of Democratic Audit.

Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the British Politics and Policy blog, on which it originally appeared, nor of the London School of Economics.

Note: This article was gives the views of the author, and not the position of Democratic Audit UK, nor of the London School of Economics.

This article originally appeared on the Electoral Reform Society blog and gives the views of the authors, and not the position of Democratic Audit, nor of the London School of Economics.

Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the Democratic Audit UK blog, nor of the London School of Economics.

It represents the views of the author and not those of Democratic Dashboard or the London School of Economics.

It gives the views of the author, and not the position of Democratic Audit, nor of the London School of Economics.

Note: this post represents the views of the authors and not those of Democratic Audit UK or the LSE.

However, Salk President Elizabeth Blackburn and other administrators argue vehemently that the 2016 report, which shows senior women pulling in more than twice as much National Institutes of Health funding as their tenured male colleagues, is inaccurate and represents only the views of its authors, who were led by plaintiff Beverly Emerson.

The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Postdoctoral Association or the Postdoc Network.

The Article and content related to the profiled company represent the personal and subjective views of the Author (SS), and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Many of these factors apply to all habitable planets making, in the view of the authors, complex life extremely rare.

All messages expressed on The Bulletproof Forum or the Blog, including comments posted to Blog entries, represent the views of the author exclusively and we are not responsible for the content of any message.

It represents the views of the author, and as such does not represent the views of the XBLA Fans staff as a whole.

Note: This opinion piece reflects the views of the author and not PlayStation LifeStyle as a whole.

This piece reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily represent the position of the local school board on which he serves.

Statements on Eduwonk are the views of the authors alone and should not be considered those of Bellwether Education Partners or of any others within the organization.

The statements on this blog are the views of the authors alone and should not be considered those of Bellwether Education Partners or of any others within the organization.

Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California.

The position expressed herein represents the point of view of the authors and not necessarily the view of personnel affiliated with the Minnesota of Higher Education.

Somewhere between these partial views of the author and publishing business lies the reality: but it is not any longer a model fixed in aspic, which is perhaps why so many look to the recent past to explain it, or choose to invent a future that has not yet arrived.

Even if you were living under a rock, a massive rock, like a boulder, you wouldn't have been able to avoid the suddenly very loudly proclaimed views of authors both traditionally published and self - published over the whole Amazon - Hachette blood war that's... read more»

I hope I haven't misrepresented the views of any authors I've cited here.

Even if you were living under a rock, a massive rock, like a boulder, you wouldn't have been able to avoid the suddenly very loudly proclaimed views of authors both traditionally published and self - published over the whole Amazon - Hachette blood war that's been happening for over a month now.