In the process of giving readers
a view of the evolution of the practice of law in Canada as seen from the perspective of one particular firm, Kyer also provides in - depth and original accounts of the interrelationships among law firms, family connections, business development, and political influence in Canadian history.
This is a simplistic and outdated
view of evolution — of nature «red in tooth and claw.»
That has a lot of implications for the usual
view of evolution, the one that says that improvements in place are always happening when something proves useful.
Despite the open questions, the Eckert et al. (2013) study is important because it provides a more solid timeline and integrated
view of the evolution of euxinia in the Black Sea, which is highly useful for assessments of climatic and other drivers of temporal change.
Begins with revision of the Catholic
view of evolution (my class struggled with this) and then details the questions, mark scheme and a sample answer for each for students to understand their marks.
An introductory essay on the History of the Supreme Court gives a broad
view of the evolution of the Supreme Court.
Using a large variety of metazoans species and modern techniques, we intend to get a general
view of the evolution of animal regeneration as well as to test the presence of general principles and / or shared genetic programs that underlie this intriguing phenomenon.
Sereno wonders — that's what would be expected in the traditional
view of evolution as progress in adaptation.
In the classic
view of evolution, organisms undergo random genetic mutations, and nature selects for the most beneficial ones.
I was pleased to read that the gene - centred
view of evolution is increasingly being challenged (7 March, p 36), because...
I was pleased to read that the gene - centred
view of evolution is increasingly being challenged (7 March, p 36), because for me it has never made sense.
The team also looked at whether students in the study agreed or disagreed with the scientific
view of evolution.
The aircraft can fly for up to 26 hours, allowing researchers to get a real - time
view of the evolution of the storm.
«This study is exciting because it gives us a clearer
view of their evolution and provides us with new context that highlights the importance of conserving these remarkable and endangered seals.»
Several unprecedented videos of gelatinous sea creatures called comb jellies, or ctenophores, now threaten to upend the standard
view of the evolution of the so - called through - gut.
Simultaneously, the bleakly reductionist
view of evolution as a product of nothing more than the sum of individual self - interest, common currency in the past half - century, is softening as we consider how natural selection may work even at the level of entire ecosystems.
Another idea is that perhaps sponges used to be more complex but lost some features along the way — a marked departure from the traditional
view of evolution as defined by increasingly complex development.
In contrast, the symbiotic
view of evolution has a long lineage in Russia, right?
So some are uneasy that the John Templeton Foundation has awarded $ 8.7 million to U.K., Swedish, and U.S. researchers for experimental and theoretical work intended to put a revisionist
view of evolution, the so - called extended evolutionary synthesis, on a sounder footing.
In Teilhard's
view of evolution, the particular consciousness or mind proper to each organism develops in a purposeful and progressive way until a multiplicity of factors, all included in the creative action of God, causes it to «boil over» into the self - conscious reflection which is humanity.
However, the general
view of evolution gained more and more empirical support.
The Men in White angels lampoon the science class's
view of evolution, calling it the «goo to you» approach because they want to speak of humans as souls made in the image of God.
It is certainly the case that
any view of evolution which recognises the emergence of intelligence as a sort of destiny, written in the script of nature, is welcome.
Microbiologist James Shapiro of the University of Chicago has done fascinating research into what he terms «a twenty - first - century
view of evolution.»
An affirmative answer to the latter, I suppose, would exemplify a purely Darwinian restricted
view of evolution — Peirce's tychism.
But I do want to insist that Peirce's conviction that evolution includes teleological direction is crucial to
a view of evolution that does not stop with a restricted Darwinian view and recognizes that evolution does occur not simply as process as such, but as progress.
My plan is to approach the topic in terms of a very brief account of Peirce's three categories as they bear on
his view of evolution.
What
view of evolution can we have, and how does it fit in with Christian teaching on purpose and destiny?
But the important part is obvious and you might gain something by accepting the challenge presented: get someone here to support
your view of evolution... if you can...
They may hold to a mixed
view of evolution plus religion; they may consider many bible stories to be fiction or a mix of fiction and fact.
The joint Rice / AAAS survey of nearly 10,000 Americans looks instead at the views of rank - and - file scientists — those working in industry and medicine, for example — and seeks to discern how evangelicals perceive scientists and science, and whether or not
their views of evolution are representative of their broader views of science.
That selfish DNA can sweep through populations, distorting
views of evolution.
Mainstream climate scientists are therefore frequently accused of «Lysenkoism,» after the Soviet scientist whose Lamarckian
views of evolution were state dogma in the Soviet Union.
Not exact matches
BestReviews wrote: The BestReviews sequel to «
Evolution of the Desk,» which was
viewed by around 300M people around the world.
With its iconic design, amazing
views and abundant access to outdoor amenity spaces, The Spiral will serve as a major leap forward in the
evolution of the modern workplace.»
This is why atheists that have extrapolated the facts
of biological
evolution into a world
view of purpose for existence (that is unsupported by the facts) clearly have a false god.
Consider that to abort a potential life because
of a world
view founded in biologic
evolution would mean that only beings with certain characteristics desired by the then present alpha figure would be allowed to gestate.
However, this does not imply some
of the more ridiculous tenets
of creationism (such as man walking with dinosaurs or the world being 6000 years old) should be objectively
viewed as truth when all evidence points to
evolution as fact.
(i) a woman's right to choose; (ii) teaching
evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization
of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to
view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» by theists (vii) basic $ ex education for older school children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use
of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.
For me I see
evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my
view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation
of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool
of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious
view not debating the existence
of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that
evolution is true so the burden
of proof falls in your lap as it is the base
of your religion.
Evolution PROVES that Adam and Eve are an ignorant man's
view of the world as it was in the dark ages.
Is not this one Cosmos
of which our universe is held in going thru its» own
evolution of pre-determinations, yet
viewed by most
of us as randomized motions?
Not when it comes to how diseases are spread, however, there is a large segment
of the Christian population in this country that is doing exactly that when it comes to
evolution, and I
view them exactly as a would someone who claimed to not believe in germs.
What amazes me is that you know that thousands
of people much smarter than you believe in
evolution, yet you think it's those
of us who share their
views who are the crazy ones.
At Bryan College — a school named for a man who is best known for opposing
evolution — some members
of the faculty objected to a statement
of faith that outlined a literal
view of creation.
Evolution and the Fall is a collection
of essays from a multi-disciplinary and ecumenical group
of authors, which sets out to address «a set
of problems that arise from the encounter
of traditional biblical
views of human origins with contemporary scientific theories» (p. xv)-- not, one might add, in general, to answer them.
But we can say, for example, that a religious, theological point
of view can illuminate scientific research and can help to extract some coherent meaning... In the Catholic Church, we have a theology
of creation whose point
of view... gives to
evolution an additional meaning which is not directly present in thescientific research, but that scientific research is coherent with this point
of view.
The essence
of Polanyi's critique
of this
view is that life requires something extraneous to physics and chemistry in order to have emerged in
evolution.
Pew reports that «in their social and political
views, young adults are clearly more accepting than older Americans
of homosexuality, more inclined to see
evolution as the best explanation
of human life and less prone to see Hollywood as threatening their moral values.