This view of faith as a deepening of our participation in reality also has christological support, which he circles back to on a number of occasions.
Not exact matches
We are also pleased to see that the CSA, IIROC and MFDA may
view refusals or low ball offers
as an indication
of problems with a registered firm's complaint handling practices including their obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good
faith with clients, act within the applicable standard
of care, or have implemented and maintained effective complaint handling procedures.
Directors may find that they face a tension between the desire to consider additional stakeholder interests beyond traditional shareholders
as per B Corporation requirements and their legal duty to act honestly and in good
faith with a
view to the best interests
of a «corporation» under both the Canada Business Corporations Act (the «CBCA») and Business Corporations Act (Ontario)(the «OBCA»).
What Ted has done is give a Taliban «ish scenario and attempted to portray any one that is
of Faith as carrying such
views.
Not among those who use «religious
faith»
as a political weapon and sanctimoniously refer to themselves
as the moral ones and the rest
of us who do not agree with their ignorant and distorted
view of things
as immoral.
The original credo
of our nation set by our founding fathers
of «E Pluribus unum» (from many, one — or from many walks
of life,
faith, world
views, we unite
as one nation) has turned into «One Nation Under [a Christian] God.»
On the same point, I know many, many people
of faith who do not «force» their
views on others, yet instead use their
faith as their guiding principle to share love, kindness, and goodness to others.
But they try to make it look like it is about «belief» in the sense
of faith (in a deity or non
faith in a deity) and
as often
as not it is about political
views (beliefs) and elections and politicians (and nothing to do with deity).
I am making the «belief in no god» a concept that a Atheist (not a Agnostic Atheist) would
view as true but can not prove so their
view would fall under the definition
of faith.
Best
of all, she suggests that people
of faith do themselves and others a disservice when they use the bible selectively to bolster their arguments for specific political
views and lifestyle prescriptions, using it «
as a blunt weapon»,
as she puts it.
Regardless
of your
views, I still have my personal
faith, you may condemn me
as simple minded or living in a fantasy world, but having witnessed first hand good triumphing over evil, I shall leave you to decide your own journey in life.
In
view of the number
of specific prophetic events that were fortold and have come about exactly
as fortold, your position requires more
faith to believe it is a fairy tale than mine to believe that there is someone (God) who knows the future and told us the future.
As one believer explained, «To turn again to the cares, perplexities, and dangers of life, in full view of jeering and reviling unbelievers who scoffed as never before, was a terrible trial of faith and patienc
As one believer explained, «To turn again to the cares, perplexities, and dangers
of life, in full
view of jeering and reviling unbelievers who scoffed
as never before, was a terrible trial of faith and patienc
as never before, was a terrible trial
of faith and patience.
As I imagine is similar in other
faiths, it is hard for an active member
of the LDS Church to publically maintain political
views that fall more in line with the Democratic Party than the GOP.
The bad part was the sense
of shame some Christians made me feel about my emotional struggles, but
as I discovered how God
views healing, I realized it wasn't my
faith that was flawed; it was their
views toward mental health and
faith.
They
view the questions that rise in their minds
as evidence
of a lack
of faith, which surely disqualifies them from being authentic believers.
Its presence there, however mistakenly justified, serves
as a continuing corrective particularly to ascetic Christian tendencies, and to an otherworldly
view of Scripture and biblical
faith in general.
Apparent «miracles» are
viewed as concrete examples
of proof, which oddly enough contradicts a «perfect»
faith.
Jesus» original disciples likely never thought
of him
as anything more than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed by God, but the idea
of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their own
views of what a «son
of God» means into the
faith.
Faith as addressing issues beyond the scope of rationality: In this view, faith is seen as covering issues that science and rationality are inherently incapable of addressing, but that are nevertheless entirely
Faith as addressing issues beyond the scope
of rationality: In this
view,
faith is seen as covering issues that science and rationality are inherently incapable of addressing, but that are nevertheless entirely
faith is seen
as covering issues that science and rationality are inherently incapable
of addressing, but that are nevertheless entirely real.
Faith as underlying rationality: In this view, all human knowledge and reason is seen as dependent on faith: faith in our senses, faith in our reason, faith in our memories, and faith in the accounts of events we receive from ot
Faith as underlying rationality: In this
view, all human knowledge and reason is seen
as dependent on
faith: faith in our senses, faith in our reason, faith in our memories, and faith in the accounts of events we receive from ot
faith:
faith in our senses, faith in our reason, faith in our memories, and faith in the accounts of events we receive from ot
faith in our senses,
faith in our reason, faith in our memories, and faith in the accounts of events we receive from ot
faith in our reason,
faith in our memories, and faith in the accounts of events we receive from ot
faith in our memories, and
faith in the accounts of events we receive from ot
faith in the accounts
of events we receive from others.
McGrath concludes that «Dawkins»
views on the nature
of faith are best regarded
as an embarrassment to anyone concerned with scholarly accuracy.»
Similarly, people born into any given religious
faith — Christian, Muslim, Hindu, etc, etc, etc — and who are immersed in that
faith, and surrounded by people
of that
faith, all
of their lives — and especially their childhood — can't be expected to suddenly cast off such total indoctrination when an atheist such
as myself presents them with certain facts which conflict with their world
view.
The most startling thing I noticed
as I grew more acquainted with the Gospels was that Jesus had a very different
view of faith than the one to which I was accustomed.
If you think that this is just a clergyman's
view, listen to Dr. Prichett when he was president
of Massachusetts Institute
of Technology: «Science is grounded in
faith, just
as is religion.»
I speak throughout Canada and internationally to churches, conferences, women's groups, universities, and workshops on topics ranging from spiritual formation, a sacramental
view of living, being a Christian feminist, the ways that we can navigate change throughout our
faith journey, the embrace
of ancient church practices
as a charismatic Christian, writing, social justice, and many other topics.
I
view us all
as ambassadors
of the
faith.
By «the more fully biblical
view of grace,» Piper is referring,
of course, to Covenant Theology / Calvinism
as described in the Westminster Confession
of Faith.)
For example, if one understood by the church simply the historically given communities with their multiplicity
of beliefs and practices, the
view of theology
as the articulation
of the church's
faith would lead to a plurality
of theologies that could hardly escape the recognition
of their relativity with respect to historical factors.
But with the Greek
view of time
as contingent and destructive, the early theologians who had to preach the
faith to the Greeks could not very well speak
of God
as the Fullness
of Time.
The method used in the writing
of this book is the same
as that used in the preparation
of the two previous volumes — The Religion
of the Hindus and The Path
of the Buddha — which I have edited in an attempt to present to Western readers the major religions
of the world from the point
of view of the followers
of those
faiths.
Whenever women challenge the spiritual authority
of men, whether by claiming a new
faith or interpreting the orthodoxies
of establish
faith, their
views have been seen
as a political challenge to male dominance.
While this change may be
viewed as moral progress, it is probably due, in part, to the evaporation
of the sense
of sin, guilt, and retributive justice, all
of which are essential to biblical religion and Catholic
faith.
In the first place it can be taken
as axiomatic in the Catholic
view of faith that where the Church's magisterium has once unambiguously required at any time an absolute, ultimate and unconditional assent
of faith to a definite doctrine
as revealed by God, the doctrine in question is no longer subject to revision and is irrevocable.
As long as German Protestants viewed the Kirchenkampf as an internal church battle about the proper direction and options for the church in a Nazi society, they ignored the deeper ideological challenge to the validity of religious fait
As long
as German Protestants viewed the Kirchenkampf as an internal church battle about the proper direction and options for the church in a Nazi society, they ignored the deeper ideological challenge to the validity of religious fait
as German Protestants
viewed the Kirchenkampf
as an internal church battle about the proper direction and options for the church in a Nazi society, they ignored the deeper ideological challenge to the validity of religious fait
as an internal church battle about the proper direction and options for the church in a Nazi society, they ignored the deeper ideological challenge to the validity
of religious
faith.
For Neville, therefore, to dismiss apparently out -
of - hand the
view that God is significantly to be described
as individual, actual, and knowledgeable is for him to show that when he is talking about «God» he is not talking about the object
of theistic
faith and worship.
My own
view of all
of this,
as a practicing social scientist interested in the relationship between religious
faith and empirical science, is that the general perspective taken by Evans - Pritchard, Douglas, and the Turners is not only entirely reasonable but close to the best account we might give.
I feel
as if the «obedience
of faith» that is being discussed directly links belief in the Gospel account (Or I will say the heart
of the Gospel account, since you
view the gospel
as the full life and works
of Jesus.
The James O'Kelly Christian Church, which represents an important southern heritage
of the United Church
of Christ, underscores other nonhierarchical biblical Reformation concerns by
viewing the Scriptures
as «the only creed, a sufficient rule
of faith and practice.»
The letter, written and signed by leaders
of several
faiths, asks President Obama, President Pro Tempore Orrin Hatch and Speaker
of the House Paul Ryan to reject the report that says religious institutions could be
viewed as bigoted.
If I am
viewed as one
of God's children then if I lose my
faith and get sent to hell he is going to have some serious explaining to do when I ask him where he has been for the last 2000 years.
Faith is not strictly a private affair in the sense that anybody's
views are just
as authoritative
as those
of anyone else.
As previously noted, such difficulties constitute a problem for
faith only if one assumes a literalistic, mechanical
view of inspiration.
On the part
of the minister there is an empathetic or phenomenological concern for the attitudes
of all the other people (and their conditions such
as broken arms) to all serious things, including Christian
faith but not confined to it, regardless
of the existing content
of those
views and conditions.
First
of all, speaking
as a conservative Christian, we do not
view Christianity
as a «
faith of the religious right».
I consider myself a christian, with religious knowledge and general knowlege, however I do not hold to a set
of views dictated by an organized religion, I believe the organized religions are where we have gone wrong,
as someone pointed out earlier to most «religious people» to question ones
faith or organization is wrong but that is exactly what the bible tells us to do... test ALL things to see what is true.
Just
as my Christian
faith will look similar and different to other Christians, atheists are not a homogeneous group, but encompass a range
of views.
Consequently, the Roman
faith has often been
viewed as one
of the backward beliefs these dispossessed groups brought over from the Old Country.
It sometimes came across
as a very shallow
view of faith and could give off the wrong idea about what it's like to follow Jesus.
The reason Calvinists have this idea is because they
view faith as a meritorious act
of the will.