This «whole»
view of human existence — I use the adjective whole to indicate an inclusive understanding of human nature — has become increasingly attractive to those working in the many different branches of science that have a bearing on human existence.
And now we meet Paul's question: If we are all involved in the sin of humankind and even saints are sinners too, if godly perfection does indeed totally escape us, and if our only hope lies in the sheer unmerited grace of God, then isn't the whole Christian
view of human existence reducible to some pathetic farce?
Aristotle had a tragic
view of human existence.
The connection was somewhat tenuous, it veered away from strictly «religious» issues, and only in the last chapter of the book did I venture a few comments suggesting a more «intrinsic» connection between the Christian
view of human existence and the nature of human life manifest in Western literature.
The view that history is the encompassing horizon can be combined with
a view of human existence which does not center in the city or even civilization.
And in this simple and harmonious
view of human existence worldly success is clear evidence of moral virtue and religious salvation.
Not exact matches
It is a fundamental fact
of human existence: communicating with others while respecting differing
views is a necessary life skill.
Unfortunately, some defenders
of theism in the eighteenth century wedded themselves to this
view of the complex machine and its maker and associated it with the
view that such special forms
of the machine as the
human body came into
existence fully formed in an aboriginal creation.
suffering, true sociality, as qualities
of the divine, along with radical differences (as we shall see) in the meanings ascribed to creation, the universe,
human freedom, and in the arguments for the
existence of God, those inclined to think that any
view that is intimately connected with theological traditions must have been disposed
of by this time should also beware lest they commit a non sequitur.
He offers a
view of transcendence which is not identical with a particular metaphysic, but which leaves the
human being in free play within the reality
of his historical
existence.
In this
view, God has placed all
human beings in particular structures
of life such as nationality, race, sexual identity, family, work, or government that in some form or other are simply givens
of creaturely
existence.
That is so, so short
of saying that essentially all
human intellectual endeavour for the past 3000 years directly supports not only the
existence of a God, but your particular
views on the nature
of that God and the truth
of the bible.
Furthermore, despite the emphasis by such theologians as Augustine, Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, and Reinhold Niebuhr (with whom Schlesinger enjoyed a personal association) on the need to distinguish between divine and
human authority, it is a gross distortion
of all
of their
views for Schlesinger to impute to them the kind
of relativism which makes the
existence of God and the reality
of revelation (the basis
of all western religious traditions) so utterly irrelevant for public life.
«Every single
human being who walks on the face
of the earth has a lense that they
view the world through... Since Evolution / Atheism denies the
existence of God and the biblical account
of creation, they have to make sense
of the fossil record and geologic formations somehow.»
When all
of existence is discovered to be sacred and one's life is
viewed as a trust to be invested in enhancing
human values, motive - power for significant involvement is created.
And what he seems concerned to emphasize in this recent article is that (assuming the truth
of the Christian understanding
of existence) the Christian revelation embodies a
view of life that objectively represents the meaning
of human existence, so that if a person is indeed to grasp in a reflective way what the meaning
of life in fact is he or she must understand it precisely in the way represented by the Christian witness.
While both men sought to implement a dynamic
view of experience, Whitehead chose to focus on the microcosmic level which resulted in his philosophy
of organism, whereas Sullivan devoted his efforts to the particular realm
of human existence which yielded his interpersonal theory
of psychiatry.
According to the
view of God and
human existence in history sketched above, it is clear that
human beings are responsible for the condition
of the world.
The first effect
of the modern
view of history and
human existence upon New Testament study was, as we have seen, to focus attention upon the kerygma as the New Testament statement
of Jesus» history and selfhood.
As a result it has become a completely open question, as to whether a kind
of history or biography
of Jesus, consistent with the contemporary
view of history and
human existence, is possible.
It appears in a different form partly because the problem
of social continuity has become as great for us as the problem
of change and reform, but even more because the historical, cultural character
of human existence has come into fuller
view.
If it is the interaction between man and man which makes possible authentic
human existence, it follows that the precondition
of such authentic
existence is that each overcomes the tendency toward appearance, that each means the other in his personal
existence and makes him present as such, and that neither attempts to impose his own truth or
view on the other.
On the other hand the Church developed another
view of God and
human life in which original sin was the all enveloping condition
of human existence, and the ministrations
of the Church were essential for salvation and sanctification.
This point
of view is not compatible with the Jewish way
of understanding
human existence, and it is in flat contradiction to what we now know about ourselves as
human.
He offered a forceful «Christian»
view of man, comparing this
view with others that fail to take into account all the facts
of human existence — Greek classical
views in the ancient world, and naturalism in the modern world.
In my
view, only individuals are actual, and for our purposes that means that the final real entities with which we are dealing are momentary embodiments
of human existence.
In contrast to the
views of the Barthian and biblical theologians, Hartshorne holds that the
existence of God can be known and proved by means
of human reason.
In speaking about his
views of eternity on Wednesday, answering a question from a caller based in Atlanta, Romney was echoing Mormon beliefs about the eternal nature
of human existence.
The Bible is
viewed not only as an historical or canonical document, but as a description
of the individual soul's journey
of spiritual development and commentary on what happens when different states
of consciousness interact with one another in the collective drama
of human existence.
In another sense, it is also true to say that
existence precedes essence, and the metaphysical
view is consequently wrong in denying it, for essence in this case is defined within the world
of interpersonal relationships, within the world
of history and
human society, within the world
of reason itself which Teilhard would call the noosphere.
All other gods and
human religions regardless
of the nature attempt to express what it is to live in
view of that knowledge that points to purpose for our
existence.
Finally, the mainstream Christian
view of existence is one
of rigid hierarchy, in which a male creator - god occupies the top link in the chain
of being,
human beings next, and nature — animals, plants, rocks — the bottom.
Focussing on the notion
of prehension as the basis
of a concept
of «shared
existence,» Cobb stresses the possibility»
of an «ecological theology» to counter the Kantian overemphasis on the
human point
of view.8 A fuller discussion
of Whitehead's ecological dimension is to be found in an article by John B. Bennet.9 Bennet suggests three possible sources
of Whitehead's value to ecological thinking.
Atomistic
views of man will no longer serve, not because we dislike them but because they are not accurate statements
of a truth which is known to us in our deepest
human existence.
Amusingly, Gregory focuses on the nose, metaphorically
viewed: if it is too small, the counselor may not discern the stenches
of human existence, but if too large, even as big as a «tower
of Lebanon overlooking Damascus» (Cant.
Whichever
of these traditional positions we take, we see that our
view of the place
of love in
human existence is at stake.
This doctrine exactly reverses Jean - Paul Sartre's
view that what marks
human existence is the impossibility
of breaking through to the other or being reached by the other.
Existentialist theology has resigned itself to an inexorable dualism
of nature and freedom, thus implicitly endorsing the
view that the core
of human existence subsists in a domain completely different from the world
of nature.
As necessary as its analysis
of the self as
existence still seems to me to be to any anthropological reflection, the value
of this analysis as well as its limitations are more likely to be justly appreciated when it is
viewed together with the other post-Hegelian philosophies
of human activity that Richard J. Bernstein has so ably discussed in his book, Praxis and Action.
Our subconscious understanding
of the laws
of physics and the natural laws He has set forth to allow our
existence to come about can not be observed, and to say that He is flawed because we see disease is
viewing things from a very limited point
of view, that being a living
human being with an aversion to disease and loss
of health.
On the contrary, he finds it useful to ponder an array
of reductionist attempts to explain the
existence of religion, from that which seeks to pinpoint the area
of the
human brain or the specific genes connected to religiosity to that which sees religion as a malfunction
of the
human mind or a vestigial remnant from a primitive stage
of human development suitable only for whimpering, immature dullards (a point
of view championed by the new atheists).
One's
view of the later - term fetus, however, is more a matter
of what might be called sympathetic identification — seeing the image
of a recognizable
human infant and, now, hearing from the experts exactly what it takes to «terminate» its
existence.
For almost the whole
of Indian thought, the pain
of the
human situation was accentuated by the
view that present
existence is only a small part
of the whole.
If they acknowledge the
existence of subjective states
of human experience, they can only
view them epiphenomenal.
We may prefer to
view images
of life after death as metaphors for the transcendent dimension
of human existence.
In March 2004, Redfield was honored by the Wisdom Media Group with the World
View Award for engaging the discussion on the nature
of human existence and for his ongoing efforts and contributions to the bettering
of humanity.
By foregrounding rocks, clouds and trees, Epstein inverts people's usual
view of the city, so that
human existence becomes secondary to nature.
We forthrightly deny the
existence of human limits and Earth's limitations and dare anyone to question these
views.
Inasmuch as it is the IPCC brief and raison d'être to ascertain the impact and negative consequences
of human - induced climate change and identify actions to mitigate against these, it is not at all surprising that IPCC would present a
view that leans toward exaggerated negative impacts and consequences, in order to assure the continued need for its very
existence.