Unconditional parenting represents a relational
view of parenting where it is understood that children learn through the relationships with the important people in their lives.
Not exact matches
In that earlier work, Locke offered a detailed refutation
of the
views set forth in Sir Robert Filmer's Patriarchia,
where Filmer argued in favor
of monarchial power exercised by rulers who have inherited their authority from Adam as the primal
parent of the human race.
From a
parent's point
of view — we're either not organic / vegan / dairy free / wheat free, etc. enough, OR,
where are the chocolate milk & chicken nuggets, and who am I to tell kids what to eat?
Parents can have the option
of using an audio baby monitor
where they can hear their baby or a video baby monitor
where they can
view their baby through the screen
of the
parent unit.
Basically, a
parent / guardian registers their student and their food allergy restrictions and based on that unique combination
of food allergies, the system securely logs the
parents on to a «
parent portal,»
where they can
view safe options for their child from the school's existing menu.
Professor Caney added that it is simply a matter
of where one draws the line: even if one believes that
parents should be able to do a great deal for their children, few, least
of all Professor Caney, would believe that he should be able to give to his children his job as a fellow at Magdalen College along with its suite
of rooms, chandelier, and
view of the deer park.
[60] In an interview in The Daily Telegraph in October 2007, Burnham said: «I think it's better when children are in a home
where their
parents are married» and «it's not wrong that the tax system should recognise commitment and marriage», creating controversy because his
views replicated the policies
of the Conservative Party.
Rick Santorum showed up on The
View today
where Raven Symoné faced him down on the issues
of marriage equality and gay
parenting, getting Santorum to admit that gay couples can raise children well.
This apparently happens often enough that the population can be
viewed as «quasi-sexual» in comparison to organisms like humans,
where the process
of sexual reproduction, specifically fertilization, combines genes from two
parents.
Many plover species lay their eggs on in the ground, out in the open,
where the nest receives direct sunlight and affords the
parents a
view of any incoming predators.
Worms is one
of those rare kiddie flicks that successfully adopt a child's - eye
view of the world,
where nothing is more important than saving face on the playground and
where parents are as distant and clueless as storybook giants.
A scientist who is inspired or mad, depending on your point
of view, creates a child
of sorts, and as the child grows into adolescence and adulthood, it starts to take on a life
of its own, unsettling and threatening its creator to the point
where it eventually seems to be telling the «
parent» what to do, and even how to evolve.
And to be sure, the differences between the two men are plainly in
view, as in a scene
where Montgomery runs into a dead soldier's
parents in a shop and impulsively breaches protocol — and incurs Stone's wrath — with his spontaneous sharing
of heartache.
It's also why it's important to have school newspapers or journalism
of some kind — podcasts or YouTube channels —
where dissenting voices are encouraged and
where students,
parents, and community members encounter different
views about controversial issues.
The teachers in predominantly poor, minority schools, who are reportedly mostly black and have adopted the more teacher - centered, authoritarian style
of instruction that they
view as appropriate for their students, are turning off white, upper - middle - class
parents who want school climates similar to their own progressive homes,
where problems are discussed.
Some students have a
view of the polluted coastline
where their
parents, grandparents, and even great grandparents used to make a living, the abandoned mining equipment that once tied their families» livelihoods to the company store, or the vast clear - cut space that was once a forest amid rolling hills.
32 The New Hampshire Supreme Court likewise rejected the standing
of petitioners challenging the state's scholarship tax credit law, ruling that they could not demonstrate any harm.33 The following year, citing the decisions in Arizona and New Hampshire, the Alabama Supreme Court also held that a «tax credit to a
parent or a corporation... can not be construed as an «appropriation»» but rather such funds retain their status as private funds until they enter the public treasury.34 That
view seems to be the prevailing one in courts, so with the possible exception
of Michigan,
where the state constitution explicitly prohibits tax benefits for religious education, tax credits should survive scrutiny under such provisions.
The
Parent Portal shows a detailed
view of their students» daily activity no matter
where they are — at home, at work, at the gym, or anywhere their lives may take them.
This Malibu also has Chevy's new Teen Driver Report
where parents can set maximum speeds before their teens even get on the road, and once the teen returns home, the
parents can
view the report
of how their teens did on the road.
I can't think
of any «normal» cases
where it'd be advantageous to have the account in the
parent's name, from a strictly total tax minimization point
of view, unless the child is earning more income than the
parent (or at least earning enough that it's worth comparing the marginal rates to check).
The Bari - based artist will present a series
of sculptures installed, arranged and then «modified by several actions» to create a surreal scene
where «stories between
parents and children are analyzed by the artist's personal
view».
In cases
where alienation is a factor, a child may express strongly negative
views about one
parent that are reflective
of the alienation; this is not a reason for a judge to not meet the child, but it may be a reason to discount the child's stated
views in coming to a decision.
For example,
where a
parent company is expected to abide by one set
of laws in the United States, but adherence to those laws may be
viewed as discriminatory in Canada, what is the appropriate course
of action for a Canadian subsidiary or branch?
Social workers ought not to have been surprised by the seven - judge decision in Re J (Children)(Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria)[2013] UKSC 9,
where the court repeated its established
view that a child should not be taken away from the care
of a
parent if there is merely a possibility that the
parent has harmed another child in the past.
While the judge had not shown any bias against the
parents, it would be sensible to allow the expert to be instructed, particularly
where, if that expert shared the
view of the other experts, there was a measurable chance that the anticipated final hearing would be unnecessary or could be abbreviated.
This is
where as the house
of the alienating
parent disappears from the rear
view mirror, then so does some
of the symptomatology
of the Parental Alienation.
This was evident at St. Francis,
where parents were not
viewed as recipients
of the services provided.
FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests —
Where both
parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them —
Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father —
Where the court has a statutory mandate to make
parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern —
Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both
parents —
Where the child's clear
views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances —
Where the child is
of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based
views —
Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption
of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted —
Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him —
Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events
of the child —
Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances —
Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution
of further proceedings in relation to the child —
Where the child is to have the outcome
of these proceedings, the effect
of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.
This month the International Platform on Shared
Parenting met in Bonn, Germany where they were promoting the view of shared p
Parenting met in Bonn, Germany
where they were promoting the
view of shared
parentingparenting.
I truly believe this fearful
view of children's motives is
where the argument against permissive
parenting stems from.
Mother - child relationships are also considered, in order to
view the totality
of parental support for the child, and see
where the child's relationship with one or both
parents may need strengthening.
The main purpose
of the Act is to amend the Adoption Act 2010 to provide: • that married
parents may place a child for adoption, on a voluntary basis, in circumstances
where both
parents place the child for adoption and
where both
parents consent to the making
of the adoption order; • for revised criteria so that
where an application to adopt a child is made in respect
of a child who is in the custody
of and who has had a home with the applicants for a period
of at least 18 months, and
where that child's
parents have failed in their parental duty towards that child for a continuous period
of not less than 36 months, the High Court may dispense with parental consent and authorise the Adoption Authority to make an adoption order in respect
of that child; • that the best interests
of the child is the paramount consideration in relation to any matter, application or proceedings under the Adoption Act 2010 and that the
views of the child shall be ascertained by the Adoption Authority or by the court, as the case may be, and shall be given due weight, having regard to the age and maturity
of the child.
No matter
where you decide to hang your
parenting schedule, providing your child with a detailed
view of the upcoming days will help to reduce their anxiety about separate households.
1.2 Consideration will be given to the
views of the child, and
where applicable the
views of parent (s) and other relevant parties.
I would not advise putting your son in special ed
where he is likely to be
viewed as a child with emotional problems and / or the victim
of poor
parenting.
In families
where parents abuse drugs: multicomponent programmes targeting affect regulation, parental mood and
views of self as a
parent, drug use and
parenting skills delivered on a one to one basis.